Literature DB >> 27381631

On the relationship between response selection and response inhibition: An individual differences approach.

Angela D Bender1, Hannah L Filmer2, K G Garner2, Claire K Naughtin2, Paul E Dux2.   

Abstract

The abilities to select appropriate responses and suppress unwanted actions are key executive functions that enable flexible and goal-directed behavior. However, to date it has been unclear whether these two cognitive operations tap a common action control resource or reflect two distinct processes. In the present study, we used an individual differences approach to examine the underlying relationships across seven paradigms that varied in their response selection and response inhibition requirements: stop-signal, go-no-go, Stroop, flanker, single-response selection, psychological refractory period, and attentional blink tasks. A confirmatory factor analysis suggested that response inhibition and response selection are separable, with stop-signal and go-no-go task performance being related to response inhibition, and performance in the psychological refractory period, Stroop, single-response selection, and attentional blink tasks being related to response selection. These findings provide evidence in support of the hypothesis that response selection and response inhibition reflect two distinct cognitive operations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Executive control; Individual differences; Response inhibition; Response selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27381631     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1158-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  11 in total

1.  Evidence against benefits from cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Kristina S Horne; Hannah L Filmer; Zoie E Nott; Ziarih Hawi; Kealan Pugsley; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-10-26

2.  "To Name or Not to Name: That is the Question": The Role of Response Inhibition in Reading.

Authors:  Jacqueline Cummine; Daniel Aalto; Amberley Ostevik; Kulpreet Cheema; William Hodgetts
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-10

3.  Beneficial Effects of Behavioral Parent Training on Inhibitory Control in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Small-Scale Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Akiko Yao; Koji Shimada; Ryoko Kasaba; Akemi Tomoda
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.435

4.  Characterising the unity and diversity of executive functions in a within-subject fMRI study.

Authors:  Rahmi Saylik; Adrian L Williams; Robin A Murphy; Andre J Szameitat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Acute alcohol does not impair attentional inhibition as measured with Stroop interference scores but impairs Stroop performance.

Authors:  P Riedel; M Wolff; M Spreer; J Petzold; M H Plawecki; T Goschke; U S Zimmermann; M N Smolka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Large inter-individual and intra-individual variability in the effect of perceptual load.

Authors:  Hadas Marciano; Yaffa Yeshurun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Anodal tDCS applied during multitasking training leads to transferable performance gains.

Authors:  Hannah L Filmer; Maxwell Lyons; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Distraction from pain: The role of selective attention and pain catastrophizing.

Authors:  Katharina M Rischer; Ana M González-Roldán; Pedro Montoya; Sandra Gigl; Fernand Anton; Marian van der Meulen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.931

9.  Neurometabolic Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Motor Inhibition in Young and Older Adults: Evidence from Multiple Regional 1H-MR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Akila Weerasekera; Oron Levin; Amanda Clauwaert; Kirstin-Friederike Heise; Lize Hermans; Ronald Peeters; Dante Mantini; Koen Cuypers; Inge Leunissen; Uwe Himmelreich; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-06-27

10.  Anodal tDCS augments and preserves working memory beyond time-on-task deficits.

Authors:  Rohith Karthikeyan; Meredith R Smoot; Ranjana K Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.