| Literature DB >> 27381356 |
Barbara Gworek1, Katarzyna Klimczak2, Marta Kijeńska3, Dariusz Gozdowski4.
Abstract
The study was focused on two goals: (i) the confirmation of the existence of a general relation between the content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sewage sludge and in plants growing in it, regardless of the type and content of sewage sludge, and (ii) if so, the answer to the question whether the uptake of PAHs by plants depends on their type. To realize the set aims, the contents of PAHs in four differentiated plant species were measured, two belonging to the Monocotyledones and two belonging to Dicotyledones group, growing in municipal and industrial sewage sludge in two locations. All the investigations were carried out during the period of 3 years. The results clearly demonstrated that the uptake of PAHs by a plant depended on polyaromatic hydrocarbon concentration in the sewage sludge. The relation between accumulation coefficient of PAHs in plant material vs. the content of PAH in sewage sludge was of exponential character. The results indicate that in case of four- and five-ring PAHs, the root uptake mechanism from soil solution occurs, regardless of the type and origin of sewage sludge and the type of plant. For three-ring PAHs, we can assume for Monocotyledones that the root uptake mechanism occurs because we observe a significant correlation between the content of fluorene, phenanthrene, and anthracene in plant material and in the sewage sludge. For Dicotyledones, the correlation is insignificant, and in this case probably two mechanisms occur-the uptake by roots and by leaves.Entities:
Keywords: Dicotyledones; Monocotyledones; PAHs; Root uptake; Sewage sludge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27381356 PMCID: PMC5031754 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7130-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Means (μmol/kg) and range (min–max) for examined plant species and sewage sludge for both locations
| PAH | Dicotyledones | Monocotyledones | Sewage sludge | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Location 1 (μmol/kg) | Location 2 (μmol/kg) | |
| Frn | 0.101 | 0.106 | 0.119 | 0.134 | 0.24 | 0.34 |
| (0.04–0.202) | (0.085–0.157) | (0.087–0.188) | (0.07–0.178) | (0.18–0.34) | (0.81–2.05) | |
| Ph | 0.201 | 0.233 | 0.328 | 0.276 | 0.79 | 1.43 |
| (0.103–0.318) | (0.194–0.32) | (0.241–0.393) | (0.163–0.328) | (0.53–1.17) | (0.81–2.05) | |
| A | 0.015 | 0.018 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.17 | 0.30 |
| (0.009–0.023) | (0.009–0.036) | (0.014–0.042) | (0.007–0.036) | (0.01–0.43) | (0.11–0.60) | |
| Ftn | 0.127 | 0.125 | 0.177 | 0.142 | 0.71 | 3.14 |
| (0.067–0.174) | (0.094–0.171) | (0.118–0.23) | (0.097–0.176) | (0.30–1.51) | (0.71–4.71) | |
| P | 0.075 | 0.116 | 0.088 | 0.073 | 0.59 | 2.1 |
| (0.048–0.112) | (0.051–0.232) | (0.065–0.142) | (0.043–0.095) | (0.12–1.26) | (0.63–3.65) | |
| BaA | 0.008 | 0.011 | 0.017 | 0.007 | 0.15 | 1.2 |
| (0.007–0.012) | (0.005–0.027) | (0.008–0.038) | (0.003–0.01) | (0.04–0.36) | (0.27–3.01) | |
| Ch | 0.020 | 0.015 | 0.025 | 0.017 | 0.15 | 1.59 |
| (0.014–0.028) | (0.009–0.024) | (0.01–0.053) | (0.009–0.024) | (0.06–0.33) | (0.41–3.80) | |
| BbF | 0.013 | 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.64 | 2.1 |
| (0.009–0.019) | (0.007–0.013) | (0.008–0.018) | (0.005–0.017) | (0.50–0.74) | (0.36–3.80) | |
| BkF | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.22 | 0.91 |
| (0.004–0.007) | (0.002–0.005) | (0.004–0.009) | (0.002–0.008) | (0.18–0.28) | (0.15–1.94) | |
| BaP | 0.010 | 0.007 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.54 | 1.83 |
| (0.008–0.014) | (0.004–0.009) | (0.006–0.027) | (0.002–0.014) | (0.41–0.66) | (0.32–3.26) | |
| DahA | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| (0.001–0.003) | (0.001–0.005) | (0.001–0.007) | (0.001–0.004) | (0.06–0.45) | (0.03–0.93) | |
| BghiP | 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.006 | 1.45 | 1.49 |
| (0.003–0.01) | (0.003–0.005) | (0.004–0.014) | (0.003–0.009) | (0.34–2.01) | (0.27–2.84) | |
| IP | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.73 | 1.43 |
| (0.003–0.007) | (0.003–0.007) | (0.005–0.008) | (0–0.008) | (0.31–1.04) | (0.23–2.58) | |
Fig. 1The correlations between accumulation coefficient of PAH in plant material vs. the content of PAH in sewage sludge for three-ring hydrocarbons (μmol/kg)
Fig. 2The correlations between accumulation coefficient of PAH in plant material vs. the content of PAH in sewage sludge for four-ring hydrocarbons (μmol/kg)
Fig. 3The correlations between accumulation coefficient of PAH in plant material vs. the content of PAH in sewage sludge for five-ring hydrocarbons (μmol/kg)
Fig. 4The correlations between accumulation coefficient of PAH in plant material vs. the content of PAH in sewage sludge for six-ring hydrocarbons (μmol/kg)
Results of regression analysis between accumulation coefficient of PAH in plant material (Y) vs. the content of PAH in sewage sludge (X)
| Dicotyledones ( | Monocotyledones ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | b |
|
| a | b |
|
| |
| Three-ring hydrocarbons | ||||||||
| Fluorene | 0.231 | −0.319 | 5.7 | 0.569 | 0.157 | −0.778 | 69.4 | 0.003 |
| Phenanthrene | 0.149 | −0.240 | 1.2 | 0.781 | 0.285 | −0.786 | 76.5 | <0.001 |
| Anthracene | 0.019 | −0.838 | 57.0 | 0.030 | 0.030 | −0.718 | 73.3 | 0.002 |
| Four-ring hydrocarbons | ||||||||
| Fluoranthene | 0.123 | −1.053 | 92.4 | <0.001 | 0.147 | −0.848 | 95.8 | <0.001 |
| Pyrene | 0.081 | −1.019 | 78.7 | 0.001 | 0.076 | −0.932 | 89.1 | <0.001 |
| Benzo[a]anthracene | 0.009 | −0.829 | 80.8 | 0.002 | 0.008 | −1.137 | 86.7 | <0.001 |
| Chrysene | 0.017 | −0.837 | 90.9 | <0.001 | 0.018 | −1.002 | 86.2 | <0.001 |
| Five-ring hydrocarbons | ||||||||
| Benzo[b]fluoranthene | 0.011 | −0.934 | 87.9 | <0.001 | 0.011 | −0.905 | 77.3 | <0.001 |
| Benzo[k]fluoranthene | 0.006 | −0.841 | 84.7 | <0.001 | 0.006 | −0.830 | 83.7 | <0.001 |
| Benzo[a]pyrene | 0.009 | −0.930 | 83.6 | <0.001 | 0.008 | −1.069 | 59.9 | 0.009 |
| Dibenz/ah/anthracene | 0.002 | −0.933 | 80.5 | 0.001 | 0.004 | −0.591 | 54.2 | 0.015 |
| Six-ring hydrocarbons | ||||||||
| Benzo[ghi]perylene | 0.005 | −0.906 | 71.7 | 0.004 | 0.007 | −0.959 | 69.0 | 0.003 |
| Indeno[123-cd]pyrene | 0.005 | −0.956 | 88.8 | <0.001 | 0.004 | −0.408 | 16.5 | 0.245 |
Applied regression model: Y = aXb
R coefficient of determination (%), P observed significance level for F test, of which a value below 0.05 indicates significant correlation
aIn some cases, sample size was equal to 8 because of missing data