| Literature DB >> 27381069 |
Patrícia Lopes Leal1, Maryeimy Varón-López2, Isabelle Gonçalves de Oliveira Prado3, Jessé Valentim Dos Santos2, Cláudio Roberto Fonsêca Sousa Soares4, José Oswaldo Siqueira5, Fatima Maria de Souza Moreira6.
Abstract
Spore counts, species composition and richness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and soil glomalin contents were evaluated in a soil contaminated with Zn, Cu, Cd and Pb after rehabilitation by partial replacement of the contaminated soil with non-contaminated soil, and by Eucalyptus camaldulensis planting with and without Brachiaria decumbens sowing. These rehabilitation procedures were compared with soils from contaminated non-rehabilitated area and non-contaminated adjacent soils. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities attributes were assessed by direct field sampling, trap culture technique, and by glomalin contents estimate. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was markedly favored by rehabilitation, and a total of 15 arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi morphotypes were detected in the studied area. Species from the Glomus and Acaulospora genera were the most common mycorrhizal fungi. Number of spores was increased by as much as 300-fold, and species richness almost doubled in areas rehabilitated by planting Eucalyptus in rows and sowing B. decumbens in inter-rows. Contents of heavy metals in the soil were negatively correlated with both species richness and glomalin contents. Introduction of B. decumbens together with Eucalyptus causes enrichment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species and a more balanced community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores in contaminated soil.Entities:
Keywords: Glomeromycota; Heavy metals; Mycorrhiza; Revegetation; Soil contamination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27381069 PMCID: PMC5052336 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Fig. 1Partial view and representation of the soil sampling sites (R – plantation rows; IR – inter-rows) in areas contaminated with heavy metals after the use of rehabilitation systems, non-rehabilitated contaminated sites, and non-contaminated sites (Cerrado and Pasture).
Characterization of soil sampling sites in areas contaminated with heavy metals after the use of the rehabilitation systems [S1 (Ec-R and Ec-IR) and S2 (EcB-R and EcB-IR)], in non-rehabilitated contaminated area (NR,) and in non-contaminated areas [Cerrado (C) and Pasture (P)].
| Areas – soil vegetation cover at the sampling time | Sampling sites | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 – S1 | Ec-R | Row |
| Ec-IR | Inter-row | |
| 2 – S2 Area with | EcB-R | Row |
| EcB-IR | Inter-row | |
| 3 – Non-rehabilitated contaminated area- Area of waste disposal with high soil contamination and without vegetation cover. Anthropized soil. | NR | |
| 4 – Original | C | |
| 5 – Pasture- | P | |
Chemical characteristics of the soil in areas contaminated with heavy metals after the use of rehabilitation systems [S1 (Ec-R and Ec-IR) and S2 (EcB-R and EcB-IR)], in non-rehabilitated contaminated area (NR), and in non-contaminated areas [Cerrado (C) and Pasture (P)].
| Characteristics | Ec-R | Ec-IR | EcB-R | EcB-IR | NR | C | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH (H2O) | 6.5 | 6.9 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 5.7 |
| P (mg dm−3) | 5.8 | 11.2 | 8.8 | 2.7 | 6.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| K (mg dm−3) | 52.6 | 56.8 | 80.8 | 72.7 | 40.8 | 123.4 | 80.4 |
| Ca+2 (cmolc dm−3) | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 81.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| Mg+2 (cmolc dm−3) | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 22.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| Al+3 (cmolc dm−3) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| H+Al (cmolc dm−3) | 1.5 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 14.4 | 4.9 | 2.7 |
| C | 3.8 | 3.4 | 5.3 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 5.6 |
| Mn (mg dm−3) | 46.8 | 56.6 | 55.8 | 83.5 | 1446 | 24.4 | 30.9 |
| Zn total (mg kg−1) | 3805 | 8673 | 574 | 581 | 47,910 | 23 | 17 |
| Zn soluble (mg kg−1) | 2866 | 6680 | 258 | 332 | 13,695 | 1.8 | 3.6 |
| Cu total (mg kg−1) | 189 | 511 | 10 | 23 | 738 | 18 | 14 |
| Cu soluble (mg kg−1) | 139 | 456 | 7.2 | 8 | 343 | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| Pb total (mg kg−1) | 77 | 139 | 32 | 50 | 6488 | 15 | 7 |
| Pb soluble (mg kg−1) | 35 | 77.3 | 15.6 | 16.6 | 32 | <2.0 | <2.0 |
| Cd total (mg kg−1) | 19 | 37 | 6 | 10 | 1207 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| Cd soluble (mg kg−1) | 18.9 | 37 | 4.8 | 5.8 | 565 | <0.02 | <0.02 |
USEPA 3051.
KCl 1 mol L−1.
SMP.
Mehlich-1.
Total number of spores (TS) and species richness (S) of AMF detected in the direct field soil samples (50 ml soil) and in trap culture pots (50 ml soil) corresponding to contaminated and rehabilitated areas (Ec-R, Ec-IR, EcB-R, and EcB-IR), to non-rehabilitated areas (NR), and to non-contaminated areas [Cerrado (C) and Pasture (P)].
| Area of study | Field | Trap culture | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS | S | TS | S | |
| Ec-R | 120 Bb | 7 | 885 Ab | 8 |
| EC-IR | 26 Bb | 7 | 470 Ab | 6 |
| EcB-R | 2718 Aa | 6 | 1222 Aa | 6 |
| EcB-IR | 452 Bb | 9 | 1660 Aa | 5 |
| NR | 5 Bb | 3 | 484 Ab | 4 |
| C | 5 Bb | 1 | 355 Ab | 3 |
| P | 29 Bb | 3 | 375 Ab | 4 |
Uppercase letters = comparisons of TS within rows; lowercase letters = comparisons within columns. Values followed by the same letter do not differ by the Scott–Knott test (P < 0.05)
Species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) detected in the direct field soil samples and in trap culture pots corresponding to contaminated and rehabilitated areas (Ec-R, Ec-IR, EcB-R, and EcB-IR), to non-rehabilitated area (NR), and to non-contaminated areas [Cerrado (C) and Pasture (P)].
| Sampling sites | Field | Trap culture |
|---|---|---|
| Ec-R | ||
| Ec-IR | ||
| EcB-R | ||
| EcB-IR | ||
| NR | ||
| C | ||
| P |
Fig. 2Species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) detected in samples of soil contaminated with heavy metals and their frequency of occurrence in all of the sampling sites.
Fig. 3Number and proportion (%) of each AMF species recovered by trap culture for the following areas: Non-rehabilitated contaminated area (NR); System with eucalyptus planted in rows and without brachiaria planted in inter-rows (S1), and System with eucalyptus planted in rows and with brachiaria planted in inter-rows (S2). Spores total amount was 484 for NR, 1355 do S1, and 2882 for S2. * AMF with low proportion in the soil in NR: Dentiscutata heterogama and Gigaspora sp.; ** AMF with low proportion in the soil in System 1: Acaulospora longula, Gigaspora sp. and Scutellospora sp.
Fig. 4Total BRSP and easily extractable glomalin (EE-BRSP) contents in samples from the direct field soil samples corresponding to the contaminated and rehabilitated areas (Ec-R, Ec-IR, EcB-R, and EcB-IR), to the non-rehabilitated area (NR), and to the non-contaminated areas [Cerrado (C) and Pasture (P)]. Uppercase letters – comparison of BRSP values; lowercase letters – comparison of EE-BRSP values. Bars with the same letter do not differ by the Scott–Knott test (p < 0.05).