Literature DB >> 27380833

Hepatitis E Virus: A Cross-Sectional Serological and Virological Study in Pigs and Humans at Zoonotic Risk within a High-Density Pig Farming Area.

C Caruso1, S Peletto1, A Rosamilia2, P Modesto1, L Chiavacci1, B Sona3, F Balsamelli1, V Ghisetti4, P L Acutis1, G Pezzoni5, E Brocchi5, N Vitale1, L Masoero1.   

Abstract

An increase in autochthonous hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections has been recorded in Italy suspected to be zoonotically transmitted from pigs; this study was carried out to determinate the seroprevalence and risk factors associated with hepatitis HEV exposition, both in swine and humans working in pig farms, located within a high-density pig farming area in Piedmont region, north-western Italy. The presence of viral RNA in human and swine samples was also evaluated, and phylogenetic analysis was performed on HEV-positive samples. Forty-two swine farms were sampled; 142 workers were enrolled in the study and classified into two groups: (i) 69 workers with occupational contact with swine (including veterinarians and farmers) recruited in the 42 sampled farms; (ii) 73 without occupational contact with swine. Forty-one of 42 (97%) swine farms resulted positive to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for HEV antibodies (Abs). Overall seroprevalence in swine was 50% (441/879), with seropositivity rate higher in sows (333/469, 71%). HEV RNA in stool samples was detected in animals from 13 of 42 tested farms (31%), and a higher positivity resulted in weaners (40/246, 16.3%). Phylogenetic analysis classified all HEV isolates within genotype 3 (subtypes 3f, 3e, 3c). All humans were negative for HEV viral genome in blood. Five of 142 sera were positive for IgG anti-HEV with an overall prevalence of 3.52% with no statistically significant differences in prevalence rates between workers at zoonotic risk and the control group (5.7% versus 1.3%). In contrast, a significant difference (OR 10.1) was observed within the subgroup including subjects exposed for short periods (veterinarians) compared with those who worked for long periods (farmers) suggesting a correlation between the time of exposure and the likelihood of HEV infection. Reporting HEV infection is not mandatory in Italy, but a constant epidemiological surveillance should be ensured to clarify the epidemiology of this disease.
© 2016 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cross-sectional study; hepatitis E virus; humans; phylogenetic analysis; pigs; risk factor; zoonosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27380833     DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis        ISSN: 1865-1674            Impact factor:   5.005


  19 in total

Review 1.  Hiding in Plain Sight? It's Time to Investigate Other Possible Transmission Routes for Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) in Developed Countries.

Authors:  Nicola J King; Joanne Hewitt; Anne-Marie Perchec-Merien
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Screening and Molecular Characterization of Hepatitis E Virus in Slaughter Pigs in Serbia.

Authors:  Lazar Milojević; Branko Velebit; Vlado Teodorović; Andrej Kirbiš; Tamaš Petrović; Neđeljko Karabasil; Mirjana Dimitrijević
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Cross-sectional Seroprevalence and Genotype of Hepatitis E Virus in Humans and Swine in a High-density Pig-farming Area in Central China.

Authors:  Yilin Shu; Yameng Chen; Sheng Zhou; Shoude Zhang; Qin Wan; Changcai Zhu; Zhijiang Zhang; Hailong Wu; Jianbo Zhan; Ling Zhang
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.327

4.  Performance of Hepatitis E Virus (HEV)-antibody tests: a comparative analysis based on samples from individuals with direct contact to domestic pigs or wild boar in Germany.

Authors:  Frauke Mara Sommerkorn; Birgit Schauer; Thomas Schreiner; Helmut Fickenscher; Andi Krumbholz
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Repeated cross-sectional sampling of pigs at slaughter indicates varying age of hepatitis E virus infection within and between pig farms.

Authors:  Marina Meester; Martijn Bouwknegt; Renate Hakze-van der Honing; Hans Vernooij; Manon Houben; Sophie van Oort; Wim H M van der Poel; Arjan Stegeman; Tijs Tobias
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 6.  Swine hepatitis E virus: Cross-species infection, pork safety and chronic infection.

Authors:  Harini Sooryanarain; Xiang-Jin Meng
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.303

7.  Incidence and Molecular Characterization of Hepatitis E Virus from Swine in Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Authors:  Olusesan Adeyemi Adelabu; Benson Chuks Iweriebor; U U Nwodo; Larry Chikwelu Obi; Anthony Ifeanyi Okoh
Journal:  Adv Virol       Date:  2017-01-16

8.  Detection of hepatitis E virus genotypes 3 and 4 in pig farms in Korea.

Authors:  Yong-Hyun Kim; Byung-Joo Park; Hee-Seop Ahn; Sang-Hoon Han; Hyeon-Jeong Go; Dong-Hwi Kim; Joong-Bok Lee; Seung-Yong Park; Chang-Seon Song; Sang-Won Lee; In-Soo Choi
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 1.672

9.  Meat consumption is a major risk factor for hepatitis E virus infection.

Authors:  Ed Slot; Hans L Zaaijer; Michel Molier; Katja Van den Hurk; Femmeke Prinsze; Boris M Hogema
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Markers for Ongoing or Previous Hepatitis E Virus Infection Are as Common in Wild Ungulates as in Humans in Sweden.

Authors:  Anette Roth; Jay Lin; Lars Magnius; Marie Karlsson; Sándór Belák; Frederik Widén; Heléne Norder
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.