Literature DB >> 27380809

Safety and discomfort during bronchoscopy performed under sedation with fentanyl and midazolam: a prospective study.

Daisuke Minami1, Nagio Takigawa2, Hiromi Watanabe3, Takashi Ninomiya3, Toshio Kubo3, Kadoaki Ohashi3, Akiko Sato3, Katsuyuki Hotta3, Masahiro Tabata3, Mitsune Tanimoto3, Katsuyuki Kiura3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although sedation with fentanyl and midazolam during bronchoscopic examination is widely accepted in the USA and Europe, it is not routine practice in Japan. The objective of the present study was to evaluate sedation with fentanyl and midazolam during bronchoscopy.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled prospectively between November 2014 and July 2015 at Okayama University Hospital. Fentanyl (20 μg) was administered to the patients just before the examination, and fentanyl (10 μg) and midazolam (1 mg) were added as needed during the procedure. A questionnaire was administered 2 hours after the examination. In the questionnaire, patient satisfaction was scored using a visual analog scale as follows: great (1 point), good (2 points), normal (3 points), uncomfortable (4 points) and very uncomfortable (5 points). An additional question ('Do you remember the bronchoscopic examination?') was also used. Predefined matters for investigation (e.g. blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and complications) were recorded.
RESULTS: The enrolled patients included 13 males and 24 females; the median age was 67 (range: 31-87) years. The patients received a median dose of fentanyl of 45.4 μg (range: 30-100 μg) and midazolam of 2.56 mg (range: 1-10 mg). Twenty-six patients (70.2%) agreed to undergo a second bronchoscopic examination, and the average levels of discomfort and re-examination were 2.02 points for each. Only 37.8% of the patients remembered the bronchoscopic examination. No severe complications were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Sedation with fentanyl and midazolam during bronchoscopic examination should be recommended for use in Japan.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; endoscopy-respiratory tract; interventional pulmonology; sedation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27380809     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyw083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  3 in total

1.  Estimation of the median effective dose and the 95% effective dose of alfentanil required to inhibit the bronchoscopy reaction during painless bronchoscopy with i-gel supraglottic airway device: an Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial.

Authors:  Nanjin Chen; Xiaodan Wang; Lingyang Chen; Mingcang Wang; Yongpo Jiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  Pulmonologist-Administered Balanced Propofol Analgosedation during Interventional Procedures: An Italian Real-Life Study on Comfort and Safety.

Authors:  Rosalba Maffucci; Uberto Maccari; Luca Guidelli; Lucia Benedetti; Roberto Fabbroni; Bruno Piccoli; Andrea Bianco; Raffaele Scala
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.149

Review 3.  The comparison of propofol and midazolam for bronchoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Zhizhen Wang; Zhi Hu; Tianyang Dai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.