| Literature DB >> 27380711 |
André Sulen1, Stein H L Lygre2, Sigrun M Hjelle1, Bjørg E Hollund1,2, Bjørn T Gjertsen1,3.
Abstract
Personalised health surveillance is infrequent or absent in occupational and environmental medicine. The shortage of functional tests in relevant cells and tissues greatly limits our understanding of environmental exposures and associated disease risk. We evaluated single cell signalling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 301 individuals in a cross sectional health survey 18 months after a chemical explosion of sulphorous coker gasoline. The accident created a malodourous environment leading to long-term health complaints. Multiple regression analysis revealed T-cell specific elevated phosphorylation of the stress kinase p-p38 (T180/Y182) among tobacco smokers and monocyte-specific elevated phosphorylation in employees at the explosion site. Other studies of the accident reported reduced tear film stability, and more airway obstruction and subjective health complaints among the employees at the accident site. Elevated monocyte p-p38 in the employee group was independent of such health effects, and could therefore be dependent on the sulphuric malodorous environment. The present study proposes signalling status in leukocytes as a scalable biomarker providing information about environmental exposures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27380711 PMCID: PMC4933906 DOI: 10.1038/srep29060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Health survey participants included in the current study group.
(a) Geographic distribution of individuals participating in the health survey in 2008–2009 and in the current study group; (i) gender and age matched inhabitants living >20 km from the site, (ii) nearby inhabitants living <6 km from the site and (iii) individuals employed at the site. (b) Flow chart describing number of participants from the health survey included in the current study group. Children (age <17) or participants above the retirement age (age >67) were excluded from the study group. (c) Overview of phospho flow workflow (details provided in materials and methods). The detailed map in (a) was downloaded from www.norgeskart.no and is licensed by The Norwegian Mapping Authority (©Kartverket, www.kartverket.no) under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The image of Norway is under Public domain (CC0, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en) and is downloaded from http://publicdomainvectors.org. Both maps have been modified by adding names of cities or indicating locations of groups of individuals taking part in the study.
Figure 2Descriptive data of p-p38 single cell analysis in the study group.
(a,b) Box plots displaying MFIs of study group p-p38, quality control (QC) p-p38 and study group isotype control for monocytes (a) and T-cells (b). Boxes extend from 25th to 75th percentiles; whiskers display minimum to maximum values and middle line represents the median. (c) Histogram displaying distribution of monocyte p-p38 MFI (binning width 2,000). (d) Histogram displaying distribution of T-cell p-p38 MFI (binning width 100). (e) Histogram comparing p-p38 and isotype control MFIs for monocytes (binning width is 2,000 and 10 for p-p38 and isotype, respectively). (f) Histogram comparing p-p38 and isotype control MFIs for T-cells (binning width is 100 and 10 for p-p38 and isotype, respectively). (g) Cropped western blots of PBMC lysates, from eight individuals with high or low monocyte p-p38, probed with antibodies detecting p-p38, total p38 and COX IV. Uncropped images are available in Supplementary Fig. S2. (h,i) Dot plots comparing monocyte p-p38 MFI to p-p38/COX IV ratios (h) and p38/COX IV ratios (i) determined by quantitation of western blots. Solid lines represent slopes of linear regressions (curves represent 95% CI).
Figure 3Selective elevated monocyte p-p38 in individuals employed at the explosion site.
Box plots displaying p-p38 MFIs in each geographical subgroup for monocytes (a) and T-cells (b). Boxes extend from 25th to 75th percentiles; whiskers display minimum to maximum values and middle line represents the median. ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc tests was used to assess statistical differences between groups (*p < 0.05).
Multiple regression analysis of monocyte p-p38 by gender, age, smoking status, geographic group and BMI (n = 301).
| n (%) | Crude MFI | Adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 95% CI | Coef. | p | 95% CI | ||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | 128 (43) | 15,297 | (14,093, 16,502) | ref | ||
| Male | 173 (57) | 15,207 | (14,241, 16,175) | −665 | 0.42 | (−2,283, 952) |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| [18, 39] | 112 (37) | 16,213 | (14,973, 17,453) | ref | ||
| [40, 49] | 79 (26) | 14,668 | (13,182, 16,156) | −1,456 | 0.14 | (−3,371, 458) |
| [50, 67] | 110 (37) | 14,676 | (13,436, 15,917) | −1,262 | 0.16 | (−3,021, 496) |
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Non-smokers | 208 (69) | 15,020 | (14,091, 15,948) | ref | ||
| Smokers | 93 (31) | 15,752 | (14,468, 17,036) | 667 | 0.43 | (−982, 2,317) |
| Geographic | ||||||
| Inhabitant >20 km | 104 (35) | 13,878 | (12,563, 15,192) | ref | ||
| Inhabitant <6 km | 105 (35) | 15,505 | (14,239, 16,772) | 1,605 | 0.08 | (−207, 3,418) |
| Employees | 92 (30) | 16,497 | (15,183, 17,810) | 2,711 | 0.006 | (783, 4,640) |
| BMI | ||||||
| Low [<−, 24.9] | 106 (35) | 14,659 | (13,372, 15,945) | ref | ||
| Medium [25, 29.9] | 133 (44) | 15,261 | (14,194, 16,327) | 897 | 0.31 | (−828, 2,622) |
| High [30, −>] | 62 (21) | 16,218 | (14,356, 18,081) | 1,863 | 0.08 | (−225, 3,952) |
Means of crude values and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are listed in the left part of the table, while coefficients (coef.), significance (p) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from the regression analysis are listed in the right part of the table.
ADescribed in Fig. 1. Distribution of predictors in the different geographic groups is presented in Supplementary Table S1.
BCrude values for each subgroup of predictors are presented in boxplots in Supplementary Fig. S3.
Multiple regression analysis of T-cell p-p38 by gender, age, smoking status, geographic group and BMI (n = 301).
| n (%) | Crude MFI | Adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 95% CI | Coef. | p | 95% CI | ||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | 128 (43) | 756 | (715, 796) | ref | ||
| Male | 173 (57) | 784 | (752, 817) | 7 | 0.81 | (−47, 61) |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| [18, 39] | 112 (37) | 776 | (736, 816) | ref | ||
| [40, 49] | 79 (26) | 796 | (741, 851) | 14 | 0.67 | (−50, 78) |
| [50, 67] | 110 (37) | 751 | (711, 791) | −19 | 0.52 | (−78, 40) |
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Non-smokers | 208 (69) | 749 | (720, 779) | ref | ||
| Smokers | 93 (31) | 824 | (777, 871) | 74 | 0.009 | (19, 130) |
| Geographic | ||||||
| Inhabitant >20 km | 104 (35) | 779 | (741, 817) | ref | ||
| Inhabitant <6 km | 105 (35) | 739 | (692, 786) | −34 | 0.27 | (−95, 27) |
| Workers | 92 (30) | 803 | (757, 849) | 13 | 0.70 | (−52, 77) |
| BMI | ||||||
| Low [<−, 24.9] | 106 (35) | 744 | (701, 789) | ref | ||
| Medium [25, 29.9] | 133 (44) | 780 | (742, 818) | 33 | 0.27 | (−25, 91) |
| High [30, −>] | 62 (21) | 803 | (750, 856) | 63 | 0.08 | (−7, 133) |
Means of crude values and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are listed in the left part of the table, while coefficients (coef.), significance (p) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) from the regression analysis are listed in the right part of the table.
ADescribed in Fig. 1. Distribution of predictors in the different geographic groups is presented in Supplementary Table S1.
BCrude values for each subgroup of predictors are presented in boxplots in Supplementary Fig. S3.
Gender stratified multiple regression analysis of T-cell p-p38 by age, smoking status (shown), geographic groups and BMI.
| Men | Women | Interaction | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | β | 95% CI | p | n | β | 95% CI | p | p | |
| Non-smoker | 111 | ref | 97 | ref | |||||
| Smoker | 62 | 97 | (30, 163) | 0.005 | 31 | 23 | (−79, 124) | 0.66 | 0.22 |
Coefficients (β), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and significance (p) from the regression analyses are listed. Test for interactions between smoking and gender in unstratified model in far right column.
Gender stratified multiple regression analysis of monocyte p-p38 by age, smoking status, geographic groups (shown) and BMI.
| Men | Women | Interaction | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | β | 95% CI | p | n | β | 95% CI | p | p | |
| >20 km | 52 | ref | 52 | ref | |||||
| <6 km | 45 | 506 | (−2,072, 3,084) | 0.70 | 60 | 2,679 | (36, 5,323) | 0.047 | 0.14 |
| Employee | 76 | 2,683 | (406, 4,960) | 0.02 | 16 | 1,379 | (−2,562, 5,319) | 0.49 | 0.26 |
Coefficients (β), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and significance (p) from the regression analyses are listed. Test for interactions between geographic groups and gender in unstratified model in far right column.