Péter Koncsos1, Péter Fülöp1, Imre Juhász1, Klára Bíró2, László Márk3, Gábor Simonyi4, György Paragh5. 1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary. 2. Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. 3. 2nd Department of Medicine, Cardiology, Pándy Kálmán County Hospital, Gyula, Hungary. 4. 3rd Department of Medicine, Cardiology, Flór Ferenc County Hospital, Kistarcsa, Hungary. 5. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary. paragh@belklinika.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels have been linked to residual cardiovascular risk, whereas non-HDL-C levels have been shown to be more predictive of cardiovascular risk than are low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. We aimed to investigate the impact of HDL-C, TG, and non-HDL-C levels on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk with on-target LDL-C levels. METHODS: In all, 424 Caucasian patients aged over 50 years who had LDL-C levels below 3.4 mmol/l with a first or subsequent ACS event were enrolled in a multicenter, retrospective study. Lipid samples were collected within 4 days after the cardiovascular event. The subjects of the age-matched, gender-balanced control group (n = 443) had LDL-C levels below 3.4 mmol/l and were free of cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS: Patients with ACS had significantly higher TG and lower HDL-C levels compared with the control patients; however, we did not find any significant difference regarding non-HDL-C levels between the two groups. In regression analysis, the risk of coronary heart disease increased significantly with 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in TG and 1 SD decrease in HDL-C levels. CONCLUSION: High TG and low HDL-C levels may contribute to residual cardiovascular risk in patients with well-controlled LDL-C levels; however, non-HDL-C levels at admission did not seem to be predictive for patients with ACS. Detection and treatment of secondary lipid targets such as high TG and low HDL-C levels may be important for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.
BACKGROUND: Changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels have been linked to residual cardiovascular risk, whereas non-HDL-C levels have been shown to be more predictive of cardiovascular risk than are low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. We aimed to investigate the impact of HDL-C, TG, and non-HDL-C levels on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk with on-target LDL-C levels. METHODS: In all, 424 Caucasian patients aged over 50 years who had LDL-C levels below 3.4 mmol/l with a first or subsequent ACS event were enrolled in a multicenter, retrospective study. Lipid samples were collected within 4 days after the cardiovascular event. The subjects of the age-matched, gender-balanced control group (n = 443) had LDL-C levels below 3.4 mmol/l and were free of cardiovascular diseases. RESULTS:Patients with ACS had significantly higher TG and lower HDL-C levels compared with the control patients; however, we did not find any significant difference regarding non-HDL-C levels between the two groups. In regression analysis, the risk of coronary heart disease increased significantly with 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in TG and 1 SD decrease in HDL-C levels. CONCLUSION: High TG and low HDL-C levels may contribute to residual cardiovascular risk in patients with well-controlled LDL-C levels; however, non-HDL-C levels at admission did not seem to be predictive for patients with ACS. Detection and treatment of secondary lipid targets such as high TG and low HDL-C levels may be important for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.
Authors: Anders G Olsson; Gregory G Schwartz; Michael Szarek; William J Sasiela; Michael D Ezekowitz; Peter Ganz; Michael F Oliver; David Waters; Andreas Zeiher Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-03-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Zeljko Reiner; Alberico L Catapano; Guy De Backer; Ian Graham; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Olov Wiklund; Stefan Agewall; Eduardo Alegria; M John Chapman; Paul Durrington; Serap Erdine; Julian Halcox; Richard Hobbs; John Kjekshus; Pasquale Perrone Filardi; Gabriele Riccardi; Robert F Storey; David Wood Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: S Matthijs Boekholdt; Benoit J Arsenault; Samia Mora; Terje R Pedersen; John C LaRosa; Paul J Nestel; R John Simes; Paul Durrington; Graham A Hitman; K M A Welch; David A DeMicco; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Michael B Clearfield; John R Downs; Andrew M Tonkin; Helen M Colhoun; Antonio M Gotto; Paul M Ridker; John J P Kastelein Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 56.272