| Literature DB >> 27380417 |
Xiaowei Yang1,2, Jianmin Gao2, Zhongliang Zhou2, Jue Yan1,2, Sha Lai2, Yongjian Xu1, Gang Chen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disease has become one of the key causes of falling into poverty in rural China. The poor households are even more likely to suffer. The New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) has been implemented to provide rural residents financial protection against health risks. This study aims to assess the effect of the NCMS on alleviating health payment-induced poverty in the Shaanxi Province of China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27380417 PMCID: PMC4933374 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Benefit package of NCMS in Shaanxi Province in 2013.
| Hospital level | Outpatient | Chronic or fatal disease | Inpatient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation rates (%) | Compensation rates (%) | Deductible (Yuan) | Compensation rates (%) | |
| Village | 75 | 60 | - | - |
| Township | 65 | 60 | 150 | 90 |
| County | - | 60 | 400 | 80 |
| City secondary | - | 60 | 500 | 75 |
| City tertiary | - | 60 | 1000 | 60 |
| Provincial secondary | - | 60 | 2000 | 65 |
| Provincial tertiary | - | 60 | 3000 | 55 |
| Celling(Yuan) | Number of people insured within a household times 100 | 20,000 for one insured person, including 20,000 for fatal disease or 5,000 for chronic disease. | 130,000 | |
Note: the NCMS classified chronic diseases into two groups: the first group including uremia, renal dialysis, cancer chemotherapy, leukemia, and the second group including diabetes, hypertension, et al. Celling lines were 20,000 Yuan for the first group and 5,000 Yuan for the second group.
Socio-demographic characteristics (percent/mean).
| General insured | Hospital admission insured | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 48.77 | 41.56 |
| Female | 51.23 | 58.44 |
| Age groups | ||
| 0–14 | 13.4 | 9.61 |
| 15–44 | 36.66 | 25.1 |
| 45–59 | 28.78 | 28.03 |
| ≥60 | 21.16 | 37.26 |
| Marital status | ||
| Unmarried | 12.01 | 3.95 |
| Married | 79.16 | 83.55 |
| Widowed | 7.88 | 11.92 |
| Divorced | 0.84 | 0.49 |
| Others | 0.12 | 0.08 |
| Education status | ||
| Illiterate | 18.43 | 26.17 |
| Primary school | 27.68 | 32.11 |
| Secondary school and above | 53.88 | 41.73 |
| Employment status | ||
| Employed | 78.77 | 70.61 |
| Retirement | 0.77 | 1.48 |
| Student | 3.76 | 0.93 |
| Unemployed | 16.96 | 26.98 |
| Economic status | ||
| per capita annual consumption expenditure (Yuan) | 11,602 (8,182) | 14,570 (9,982) |
| per capita annual out-of-pocket health payment (Yuan) | 2,152 (3,794) | 5,681 (6,932) |
| N | 41,037 | 4,028 |
Standard deviations are in the parentheses.
Measures of poverty gross and net of health payments and after compensation for all NCMS insured.
| Gross of health payments(1) | Net of health payments(2) | Difference | After compensation(5) | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute(3) = (2)-(1) | Relative(4) = [(3)/(1)]*100 | Absolute(6) = (5)-(2) | Relative(7) = [(6)/(2)]*100 | ||||
| Poverty headcount | 2.55% (0.0008) | 5.81% (0.0012) | 3.26% | 127.84% | 4.84% (0.0011) | -0.97 | -16.70% |
| Poverty gap | 16.07 (0.6084) | 42.90 (1.0377) | 26.83 | 166.96% | 34.49 (0.9288) | -8.41 | -19.60% |
| Normalized poverty gap | 0.70% (0.0003) | 1.87% (0.0005) | 1.17% | 167.14% | 1.50% (0.0004) | -0.37% | -19.79% |
| Mean positive poverty gap | 630.00 (14.1218) | 738.16 (10.1805) | 108.16 | 17.17% | 711.86 (11.1848) | -26.30 | -3.56% |
| Normalized mean positive poverty gap | 27.39% (0.0061) | 32.09% (0.0044) | 4.70% | 17.16% | 30.95% (0.0049) | -1.14% | -3.55% |
Standard errors presented in the parentheses.
Test the difference between the payments with and without compensation:
χ2 = 38.07 p<0.001
t = 19.45 P<0.001
t = 4.63 P<0.001.
Fig 1Effect of health payments and NCMS compensation on Pen’s parade of the household consumption distribution for whole NCMS insured.
The black vertical not covered by the grey vertical represents the consumption reducing from NCMS compensation. When the black bar crosses the poverty line and the grey bar goes back above the poverty line, it represents the poverty alleviation by the NCMS.
Measures of poverty gross and net of health payments and after compensation for hospital admission insured.
| Gross of health payments(1) | Net of health payments(2) | Difference | After compensation(5) | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute(3) = (2)-(1) | Relative(4) = [(3)/(1)]*100 | Absolute(6) = (4)-(2) | Relative(7) = [(5)/(2)]*100 | ||||
| Poverty headcount | 0.45% (0.0011) | 7.50% (0.0042) | 7.05% | 1566.67% | 2.09% (0.0023) | -5.41% | -72.21% |
| Poverty gap | 1.73 (0.5928) | 57.48 (3.8075) | 55.75 | 3222.54% | 10.01 (1.3500) | -47.47 | -82.59% |
| Normalized poverty gap | 0.08% (0.0003) | 2.50% (0.0017) | 2.42% | 3025.00% | 0.44% (0.0006) | -2.06% | -82.47% |
| Mean positive poverty gap | 386.51 (99.3997) | 766.60 (27.9439) | 380.09 | 98.34% | 479.92 (38.7010) | 286.68 | -37.40% |
| Normalized mean positive poverty gap | 16.80% (0.0432) | 33.33% (0.0121) | 16.53% | 98.39% | 20.87% (0.0168) | 12.46% | -37.38% |
Standard errors presented in the parentheses.
Test the difference between the payments with and without compensation:
χ2 = 129.32 p<0.001
t = 14.46 P<0.001
t = 5.27 P<0.001.
Fig 2Effect of health payments and NCMS compensation on Pen’s parade of the household consumption distribution for hospital admission insured.
Respondents’ economic status declined sharply and even crossed the poverty line when health payments are netted out. This illustrates that the health payments play a significant effect on household economic status for those who has been hospitalized. And insurance compensation helps alleviate the poverty status to some extent.