Literature DB >> 27380187

Distributed Cognition and Distributed Morality: Agency, Artifacts and Systems.

Richard Heersmink1.   

Abstract

There are various philosophical approaches and theories describing the intimate relation people have to artifacts. In this paper, I explore the relation between two such theories, namely distributed cognition and distributed morality theory. I point out a number of similarities and differences in these views regarding the ontological status they attribute to artifacts and the larger systems they are part of. Having evaluated and compared these views, I continue by focussing on the way cognitive artifacts are used in moral practice. I specifically conceptualise how such artifacts (a) scaffold and extend moral reasoning and decision-making processes, (b) have a certain moral status which is contingent on their cognitive status, and (c) whether responsibility can be attributed to distributed systems. This paper is primarily written for those interested in the intersection of cognitive and moral theory as it relates to artifacts, but also for those independently interested in philosophical debates in extended and distributed cognition and ethics of (cognitive) technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distributed moral cognition; Material agency; Moral agency; Moral status of artifacts; Neuroethics; Responsibility; Systems agency

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27380187     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9802-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  6 in total

1.  Is external memory memory? Biological memory and extended mind.

Authors:  Kourken Michaelian
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-05-17

2.  Imagination, distributed responsibility and vulnerable technological systems: the case of Snorre A.

Authors:  Mark Coeckelbergh; Ger Wackers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Rethinking neuroethics in the light of the extended mind thesis.

Authors:  Neil Levy
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Distributed morality in an information society.

Authors:  Luciano Floridi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The capacity for ethical decisions: the relationship between working memory and ethical decision making.

Authors:  April Martin; Zhanna Bagdasarov; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Can technological artefacts be moral agents?

Authors:  Martin Peterson; Andreas Spahn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Commentary: Distributed Cognition and Distributed Morality: Agency, Artifacts and Systems.

Authors:  Witold M Wachowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-09

2.  The Over-Extended Mind? Pink Noise and the Ethics of Interaction-Dominant Systems.

Authors:  Darian Meacham; Miguel Prado Casanova
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 0.917

3.  Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.

Authors:  Sara Goering; Eran Klein; Laura Specker Sullivan; Anna Wexler; Blaise Agüera Y Arcas; Guoqiang Bi; Jose M Carmena; Joseph J Fins; Phoebe Friesen; Jack Gallant; Jane E Huggins; Philipp Kellmeyer; Adam Marblestone; Christine Mitchell; Erik Parens; Michelle Pham; Alan Rubel; Norihiro Sadato; Mina Teicher; David Wasserman; Meredith Whittaker; Jonathan Wolpaw; Rafael Yuste
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 1.427

4.  Knowledge-building in an environment mediated by digital technology: A case study in higher education.

Authors:  Judith Martín-Lucas; Ángel García Del Dujo
Journal:  Educ Inf Technol (Dordr)       Date:  2022-09-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.