Literature DB >> 27379951

Validity of Treadmill-Derived Critical Speed on Predicting 5000-Meter Track-Running Performance.

Alfred Nimmerichter1, Nina Novak, Christoph Triska, Bernhard Prinz, Brynmor C Breese.   

Abstract

Nimmerichter, A, Novak, N, Triska, C, Prinz, B, and Breese, BC. Validity of treadmill-derived critical speed on predicting 5,000-meter track-running performance. J Strength Cond Res 31(3): 706-714, 2017-To evaluate 3 models of critical speed (CS) for the prediction of 5,000-m running performance, 16 trained athletes completed an incremental test on a treadmill to determine maximal aerobic speed (MAS) and 3 randomly ordered runs to exhaustion at the [INCREMENT]70% intensity, at 110% and 98% of MAS. Critical speed and the distance covered above CS (D') were calculated using the hyperbolic speed-time (HYP), the linear distance-time (LIN), and the linear speed inverse-time model (INV). Five thousand meter performance was determined on a 400-m running track. Individual predictions of 5,000-m running time (t = [5,000-D']/CS) and speed (s = D'/t + CS) were calculated across the 3 models in addition to multiple regression analyses. Prediction accuracy was assessed with the standard error of estimate (SEE) from linear regression analysis and the mean difference expressed in units of measurement and coefficient of variation (%). Five thousand meter running performance (speed: 4.29 ± 0.39 m·s; time: 1,176 ± 117 seconds) was significantly better than the predictions from all 3 models (p < 0.0001). The mean difference was 65-105 seconds (5.7-9.4%) for time and -0.22 to -0.34 m·s (-5.0 to -7.5%) for speed. Predictions from multiple regression analyses with CS and D' as predictor variables were not significantly different from actual running performance (-1.0 to 1.1%). The SEE across all models and predictions was approximately 65 seconds or 0.20 m·s and is therefore considered as moderate. The results of this study have shown the importance of aerobic and anaerobic energy system contribution to predict 5,000-m running performance. Using estimates of CS and D' is valuable for predicting performance over race distances of 5,000 m.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27379951     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Modelling 5-km Running Performance on Level and Hilly Terrains in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Onécimo Ubiratã Medina Melo; Marcus Peikriszwili Tartaruga; Edilson Fernando de Borba; Daniel Boullosa; Edson Soares da Silva; Rodrigo Torma Bernardo; Renan Coimbra; Henrique Bianchi Oliveira; Rodrigo Gomes da Rosa; Leonardo Alexandre Peyré-Tartaruga
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-22

2.  Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling.

Authors:  Bettina Karsten; Luca Petrigna; Andreas Klose; Antonino Bianco; Nathan Townsend; Christoph Triska
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Peak Running Velocity or Critical Speed Under Field Conditions: Which Best Predicts 5-km Running Performance in Recreational Runners?

Authors:  Diogo Hilgemberg Figueiredo; Diego Hilgemberg Figueiredo; Francisco de Assis Manoel; Fabiana Andrade Machado
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Calculation of Critical Speed from Raw Training Data in Recreational Marathon Runners.

Authors:  Barry Smyth; Daniel Muniz-Pumares
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.