Claire E Badenhorst1, Brian Dawson2, Gregory R Cox3, Marc Sim4,5, Coby M Laarakkers6,7, Dorine W Swinkels6,7, Peter Peeling2,4. 1. School of Sport Science, The University of Western Australia Crawley, Exercise and Health M408, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia. claire.badenhorst@research.uwa.edu.au. 2. School of Sport Science, The University of Western Australia Crawley, Exercise and Health M408, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia. 3. Sports Nutrition, Australian Institute of Sport, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. 4. Western Australian Institute of Sport, Mt Claremont, Western Australia. 5. School of Human Movement and Sport Science, Federation University, Mt Helen, VIC, Australia. 6. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 7. Hepcidinanalysis.com, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This investigation examined if a high carbohydrate (CHO) diet, maintained across a seven-day training period, could attenuate post-exercise interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum hepcidin levels. METHODS:Twelve endurance-trained male athletes completed twoseven-day running training blocks whilst consuming either a high (8 g kg(-1)) versus a low (3 g kg(-1)) CHO isoenergetic diet. Each training block consisted of five running sessions performed on days 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7, with the intensity and duration of each session matched between training weeks. Serum levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and hepcidin were measured pre- and either immediately (IL-6) or 3-h (hepcidin) post-exercise on days 1 and 7 of each training week. RESULTS: During each training week, the immediate post-exercise IL-6 and 3-h post-exercise serum hepcidin levels were significantly elevated (both p = 0.001) from pre-exercise on days 1 and 7. These increases were not different between trials. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the ingestion of a high (compared to low) CHO diet over a seven-day training period is ineffective in attenuating post-exercise IL-6 and hepcidin responses. Such results may be due to the modest training load, the increased protein intake in the low-CHO trial, and a 48 h recovery period prior to sample collection on day 7, allowing a full recovery of muscle glycogen status between exercise sessions.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This investigation examined if a high carbohydrate (CHO) diet, maintained across a seven-day training period, could attenuate post-exercise interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum hepcidin levels. METHODS: Twelve endurance-trained male athletes completed two seven-day running training blocks whilst consuming either a high (8 g kg(-1)) versus a low (3 g kg(-1)) CHO isoenergetic diet. Each training block consisted of five running sessions performed on days 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7, with the intensity and duration of each session matched between training weeks. Serum levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and hepcidin were measured pre- and either immediately (IL-6) or 3-h (hepcidin) post-exercise on days 1 and 7 of each training week. RESULTS: During each training week, the immediate post-exercise IL-6 and 3-h post-exercise serum hepcidin levels were significantly elevated (both p = 0.001) from pre-exercise on days 1 and 7. These increases were not different between trials. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the ingestion of a high (compared to low) CHO diet over a seven-day training period is ineffective in attenuating post-exercise IL-6 and hepcidin responses. Such results may be due to the modest training load, the increased protein intake in the low-CHO trial, and a 48 h recovery period prior to sample collection on day 7, allowing a full recovery of muscle glycogen status between exercise sessions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Endurance training; Inflammation; Iron metabolism; Nutrition
Authors: Peter Peeling; Brian Dawson; Carmel Goodman; Grant Landers; Erwin T Wiegerinck; Dorine W Swinkels; Debbie Trinder Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: D C Nieman; S L Nehlsen-Cannarella; O R Fagoaga; D A Henson; A Utter; J M Davis; F Williams; D E Butterworth Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Andrew J Cochran; Frank Myslik; Martin J MacInnis; Michael E Percival; David Bishop; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Martin J Gibala Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: A Steensberg; M A Febbraio; T Osada; P Schjerling; G van Hall; B Saltin; B K Pedersen Journal: J Physiol Date: 2001-12-01 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Jason S Troutt; Mats Rudling; Lena Persson; Lars Ståhle; Bo Angelin; Anthony M Butterfield; Andrew E Schade; Guoqing Cao; Robert J Konrad Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Tessel E Galesloot; Sita H Vermeulen; Anneke J Geurts-Moespot; Siem M Klaver; Joyce J Kroot; Dorlene van Tienoven; Jack F M Wetzels; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Fred C Sweep; Martin den Heijer; Dorine W Swinkels Journal: Blood Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Marc Sim; Laura A Garvican-Lewis; Gregory R Cox; Andrew Govus; Alannah K A McKay; Trent Stellingwerff; Peter Peeling Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Martina Zügel; Gunnar Treff; Jürgen M Steinacker; Benjamin Mayer; Kay Winkert; Uwe Schumann Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Bharbara N Passos; Mirthes C Lima; Ana P R Sierra; Rodrigo A Oliveira; Jaqueline F S Maciel; Richelieau Manoel; Julliane I Rogante; João B Pesquero; Maria F Cury-Boaventura Journal: Mediators Inflamm Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 4.711