OBJECTIVE: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) could be used to stratify patients in different risk groups. No studies have reported the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in a subgroup of patients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. This study was designed to evaluate the benefit of TIPS in cirrhotic patients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) for rebleeding and survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 46 cirrhotic patients with a history of variceal bleeding and a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and June 2014 (TIPS group). Patients were matched by Child-Pugh scores to patients in our historical cohort hospitalized for prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding between April 2011 and December 2012 (propranolol + EVL group). The end points included time to significant rebleeding from portal hypertensive sources, 1-year survival, and time to the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). RESULTS: The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of variceal rebleeding was significantly higher in the TIPS group than in the propranolol + EVL group (85% vs. 54%, p = 0.01). The 1-year survival rates were not different between the two groups (85% vs. 89%, p = 0.591). The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of HE was significantly lower in the TIPS group than in the propranolol + EVL group (67% vs. 91%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: TIPS was more effective than propranolol + EVL in preventing variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg). During the limited follow-up, survival was similar in the two groups.
OBJECTIVE: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) could be used to stratify patients in different risk groups. No studies have reported the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in a subgroup of patients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. This study was designed to evaluate the benefit of TIPS in cirrhoticpatients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) for rebleeding and survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 46 cirrhoticpatients with a history of variceal bleeding and a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and June 2014 (TIPS group). Patients were matched by Child-Pugh scores to patients in our historical cohort hospitalized for prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding between April 2011 and December 2012 (propranolol + EVL group). The end points included time to significant rebleeding from portal hypertensive sources, 1-year survival, and time to the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). RESULTS: The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of variceal rebleeding was significantly higher in the TIPS group than in the propranolol + EVL group (85% vs. 54%, p = 0.01). The 1-year survival rates were not different between the two groups (85% vs. 89%, p = 0.591). The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of HE was significantly lower in the TIPS group than in the propranolol + EVL group (67% vs. 91%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: TIPS was more effective than propranolol + EVL in preventing variceal rebleeding in cirrhoticpatients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg). During the limited follow-up, survival was similar in the two groups.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hepatic encephalopathy; individualized treatment; second prophylaxis; survival; variceal bleeding
Authors: Shivaram P Singh; Manav Wadhawan; Subrat K Acharya; Sawan Bopanna; Kaushal Madan; Manoj K Sahoo; Naresh Bhat; Sri P Misra; Ajay Duseja; Amar Mukund; Anil C Anand; Ashish Goel; Bonthala S Satyaprakash; Joy Varghese; Manas K Panigrahi; Manu Tandan; Mihir K Mohapatra; Pankaj Puri; Pravin M Rathi; Rajkumar P Wadhwa; Sunil Taneja; Varghese Thomas; Vikram Bhatia Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2021-12-10