| Literature DB >> 27379295 |
Abstract
Novel oligomer metal complexes (2a-f) of the ligandEntities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 27379295 PMCID: PMC4897237 DOI: 10.1155/2014/516274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Sch Res Notices ISSN: 2356-7872
Scheme 1Synthetic route for the oligomer metal complexes.
Physicochemical parameters of the ligand and its oligomer metal complexes.
| Empirical formula of compound | Empirical weight (gm) | Color | Yield % | M.P.a (°C) | Elemental analysis calc. (found %) |
|
| DP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | N | M | |||||||||
|
| L | 562.16 | Light yellow | 65 | 160b | 47.00 | 2.51 | 4.98 (4.92) | — | — | — | — |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Mn–L–(H2O)2] | 651.12 | White | 45 | >250 | 40.58 | 2.48 | 4.30 | 8.44 | 5.54 | 3250 | 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Fe–L–(H2O)2] | 652.02 | Light brown | 58 | >250 | 40.53 | 2.47 | 4.30 | 8.56 | 4.98 | 3901 | 6 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Co–L–(H2O)2] | 655.11 | Light pink | 55 | >250 | 40.33 | 2.46 | 4.28 | 9.00 | 4.25 | 3257 | 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Ni–L–(H2O)2] | 654.87 | Light green | 63 | >250 | 40.35 | 2.46 | 4.28 | 8.96 | 2.87 | 3250 | 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Cu–L–(H2O)2] | 659.73 | Green | 70 | >250 | 40.05 | 2.44 | 4.25 | 9.63 | 1.99 | 3941 | 6 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Zn–L–(H2O)2] | 661.56 | White | 45 | >250 | 39.94 | 2.44 | 4.23 | 9.88 | D | 3312 | 5 |
aMelting points were checked by standard open capillary method and were found uncorrected; buncorrected.
μ eff B.M.: magnetic moment, : number of average molecular weights, DP: degree of polymerization, and D: diamagnetic.
FT-IR frequencies and electronic spectral data of the ligand and its oligomer metal complexes.
| Compound | −COOH | −CONH | −OH | −C=O | −CONH | COO− | C–O | M–O | M–N | Electronic spectral data | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cm−1 | Transitions | |||||||||||
|
| L | 3555 | 3237 | — | 1712 | 1688 | 1465 | 1047 | — | — | — | — |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Mn–L–(H2O)2] | — | 3212 | 2982 | 1692 | 1665 | 1453 | 1029 | 623 | 528 | 16,486, | 6A1g → 4T1g(4G), |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Fe–L–(H2O)2] | — | 3220 | 2979 | 1694 | 1673 | 1455 | 1026 | 628 | 531 | 19011 | 5T2g(F) → 3Eg
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Co–L–(H2O)2] | — | 3211 | 2983 | 1690 | 1672 | 1447 | 1028 | 630 | 529 | 9,845 | 4T1g(F) → 4T2g(F) |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Ni–L–(H2O)2] | — | 3214 | 2977 | 1695 | 1669 | 1449 | 1025 | 634 | 526 | 9,851 | 3A2g → 3T2g
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Cu–L–(H2O)2] | — | 3225 | 2969 | 1689 | 1671 | 1450 | 1027 | 629 | 532 | 15,949 | 2T2g → 2Eg
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| [Zn–L–(H2O)2] | — | 3213 | 2973 | 1687 | 1668 | 1446 | 1026 | 632 | 527 | — | — |
Figure 1FT-IR of ligand and Cu-metal complex.
Figure 2Thermogram of oligomer metal complexes.
Figure 3Antibacterial activity of ligand and its oligomer metal complexes.
Figure 4Antifungal activity of ligand and its oligomer metal complexes.