Literature DB >> 27378637

Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.

Wael A Rahman1, Tomás Amenábar2, Bandar M Hetaimish3, Oleg A Safir4, Paul R Kuzyk4, Allan E Gross4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This is a retrospective review of the functional outcomes and complications of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) of failed metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: A total of 20 revision THAs were performed in 19 patients. Of them, 2 cases were failed hip resurfacing, and 18 cases were failed (MoM) THA. The mean age at revision (THA) was 59.35 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.83).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 45 months (SD 13.98). The indications of revision were aseptic loosening of acetabular component without adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR; 10 hips), aseptic loosening of the acetabular and femoral components without ALTR (1 hip), painful hip associated with ALTR (6 hips), iliopsoas impingement associated with a large-diameter femoral head or malpositioned acetabular component (3 hips). The acetabular components were revised in 18 hips using Trabecular Metal Modular cups. The femoral components were revised in 3 hips. A constrained acetabular liner was used in 5 hips. The Harris hip score significantly improved from 48.4 (SD 12.98) to 83.25 (SD 10.08). There were 2 complications (1 foot drop and 1 superficial infection) and 1 failure (recurrent dislocation) that required revision to a constrained liner.
CONCLUSION: Early results of revision THA of failed MoM hip arthroplasty showed improvement in pain and functional outcome. No case of failed bone ingrowth was noted with the use of Trabecular Metal Modular cups. Extensive soft tissue and abductor muscles dysfunctions were common. A constrained acetabular component with repair of the hip abductors might be beneficial.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; constrained liner; failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty; revision hip arthroplasty; trabecular metal cup

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27378637     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Perioperative factors associated with increased length of stay after revision of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan H Garfinkel; Brian P Gladnick; Cole S Pachter; Niall H Cochrane; David W Romness
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-01-17

2.  Mid-term outcomes of uncemented or cemented arthroplasty revision following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty failure: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Wenli Chen; Weiguang Yu; Mingdong Zhao; Jinluan Lin; Chaoming Zhou; Hui Chen; Junxing Ye; Xianshang Zeng; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using cemented arthroplasty: a mean 10-year follow-up of 157 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jinluan Lin; Chunlong Huang; Weiguang Yu; Guowei Han; Xiangzhen Liu; Xianshang Zeng
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wenlu Liu; Huanyi Lin; Xianshang Zeng; Meiji Chen; Weiwei Tang; Ting Zhou; Weiguang Yu; Qilong Liu; Guixing Xu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.