| Literature DB >> 27378537 |
Peng Li1, Travis E Baker2, Chris Warren3, Hong Li4.
Abstract
The electrophysiological response to positive and negative feedback during reinforcement learning has been well documented over the past two decades, yet, little is known about the neural response to uninformative events that often follow our actions. To address this issue, we recorded the electroencephalograph (EEG) during a time-estimation task using both informative (positive and negative) and uninformative (neutral) feedback. In the time-frequency domain, uninformative feedback elicited significantly less induced beta-gamma activity than informative feedback. This result suggests that beta-gamma activity is particularly sensitive to feedback that can guide behavioral adjustments, consistent with other work. In contrast, neither theta nor delta activity were sensitive to the difference between negative and neutral feedback, though both frequencies discriminated between positive, and non-positive (neutral or negative) feedback. Interestingly, in the time domain, we observed a linear relationship in the amplitude of the feedback-related negativity (neutral>negative>positive), a component of the event-related brain potential thought to index a specific kind of reinforcement learning signal called a reward prediction error. Taken together, these results suggest that the reinforcement learning system treats neutral feedback as a special case, providing valuable information about the electrophysiological measures used to index the cognitive function of frontal midline cortex.Entities:
Keywords: Beta-gamma; Feedback-related negativity; Neutral feedback; Reinforcement learning; Theta
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27378537 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.06.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Psychophysiol ISSN: 0167-8760 Impact factor: 2.997