Literature DB >> 27378537

Oscillatory profiles of positive, negative and neutral feedback stimuli during adaptive decision making.

Peng Li1, Travis E Baker2, Chris Warren3, Hong Li4.   

Abstract

The electrophysiological response to positive and negative feedback during reinforcement learning has been well documented over the past two decades, yet, little is known about the neural response to uninformative events that often follow our actions. To address this issue, we recorded the electroencephalograph (EEG) during a time-estimation task using both informative (positive and negative) and uninformative (neutral) feedback. In the time-frequency domain, uninformative feedback elicited significantly less induced beta-gamma activity than informative feedback. This result suggests that beta-gamma activity is particularly sensitive to feedback that can guide behavioral adjustments, consistent with other work. In contrast, neither theta nor delta activity were sensitive to the difference between negative and neutral feedback, though both frequencies discriminated between positive, and non-positive (neutral or negative) feedback. Interestingly, in the time domain, we observed a linear relationship in the amplitude of the feedback-related negativity (neutral>negative>positive), a component of the event-related brain potential thought to index a specific kind of reinforcement learning signal called a reward prediction error. Taken together, these results suggest that the reinforcement learning system treats neutral feedback as a special case, providing valuable information about the electrophysiological measures used to index the cognitive function of frontal midline cortex.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beta-gamma; Feedback-related negativity; Neutral feedback; Reinforcement learning; Theta

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27378537     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  9 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measures reveal the role of anterior cingulate cortex in learning from unreliable feedback.

Authors:  Peng Li; Weiwei Peng; Hong Li; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Behavioral preference in sequential decision-making and its association with anxiety.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Ruolei Gu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Social Feedback Valence Differentially Modulates the Reward Positivity, P300, and Late Positive Potential.

Authors:  Carter J Funkhouser; Randy P Auerbach; Autumn Kujawa; Sylvia A Morelli; K Luan Phan; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  J Psychophysiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.333

4.  To Know or Not to Know? Theta and Delta Reflect Complementary Information about an Advanced Cue before Feedback in Decision-Making.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Zhaofeng Chen; Xiaozhe Peng; Tiantian Yang; Peng Li; Fengyu Cong; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-06

5.  Valence and magnitude ambiguity in feedback processing.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Xue Feng; Lucas S Broster; Lu Yuan; Pengfei Xu; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Electrical Brain Responses Reveal Sequential Constraints on Planning during Music Performance.

Authors:  Brian Mathias; William J Gehring; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-01-28

7.  The effect of mental countermeasures on a novel brain-based feedback concealed information test.

Authors:  Jinbin Zheng; Jiayu Cheng; Chongxiang Wang; Xiaohong Lin; Genyue Fu; Liyang Sai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.399

8.  Belief or disbelief in feedback influences the detection efficiency of the feedback concealed information test.

Authors:  Jiayu Cheng; Yanyan Sai; Jinbin Zheng; Joseph M Olson; Liyang Sai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-25

9.  Slow Is Also Fast: Feedback Delay Affects Anxiety and Outcome Evaluation.

Authors:  Xukai Zhang; Yi Lei; Hang Yin; Peng Li; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.