| Literature DB >> 27378420 |
Yu Jiang1,2, Xiaomin Huang1, Xin Zhang3, Xingyue Zhang4, Yi Zhang1, Chengyan Zheng3, Aixing Deng3, Jun Zhang3, Lianhai Wu5, Shuijin Hu2, Weijian Zhang1,3.
Abstract
Rice paddies are a major source of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, especially under alternate wetting-drying irrigation and high N input. Increasing photosynthate allocation to the grain in rice (Oryza sativa L.) has been identified as an effective strategy of genetic and agronomic innovation for yield enhancement; however, its impacts on N2O emissions are still unknown. We conducted three independent but complementary experiments (variety, mutant study, and spikelet clipping) to examine the impacts of rice plant photosynthate allocation on paddy N2O emissions. The three experiments showed that N2O fluxes were significantly and negatively correlated with the ratio of grain yield to total aboveground biomass, known as the harvest index (HI) in agronomy (P < 0.01). Biomass accumulation and N uptake after anthesis were significantly and positively correlated with HI (P < 0.05). Reducing photosynthate allocation to the grain by spikelet clipping significantly increased white root biomass and soil dissolved organic C and reduced plant N uptake, resulting in high soil denitrification potential (P < 0.05). Our findings demonstrate that optimizing photosynthate allocation to the grain can reduce paddy N2O emissions through decreasing belowground C input and increasing plant N uptake, suggesting the potential for genetic and agronomic efforts to produce more rice with less N2O emissions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27378420 PMCID: PMC4932627 DOI: 10.1038/srep29333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Correlations between mean N2O fluxes during the grain filling stage and rice harvest index at Danyang (a) and Jinxian (b) under the field conditions.
Figure 2Difference in N2O fluxes between the rice variety (WT, Yangdao 6) and its mutant (Mutant) under the field (a) and the pot conditions (b). Error bars represent 1 standard error.
Figure 3Differences in N2O fluxes between the spikelet-clipped and -unclipped treatments under the field (a,b) and the pot (c,d) conditions. (a,c) rice variety Yangdao 6; (b,d) rice variety Ningjing 1. Error bars represent 1 standard error.
Figure 4Correlations between biomass accumulation after anthesis and harvest index at Danyang (a) and Jinxian (b) in the rice variety experiment; differences in biomass between WT and Mutant in the mutant experiment (c) and between spikelet-clipped and -unclipped treatments in the spikelet clipping experiment (d) under the pot conditions. Error bars represent 1 standard error. *and **indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Figure 5Correlations between plant N uptake after anthesis and harvest index at Danyang (a) and Jinxian (b) in the rice variety experiment; differences in plant N uptake between WT and Mutant in the mutant experiment (c) and between spikelet-clipped and -unclipped treatments in the spikelet clipping experiment (d). Error bars represent 1 standard error. *and **indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Figure 6Differences in soil DOC concentration (a) and denitrification potential (b) between the spikelet-clipped and -unclipped treatments under the pot conditions. Error bars represent 1 standard error. *and **indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Figure 7A conceptual framework of the effects of increased photosynthate allocation to grain on N2O emissions.