| Literature DB >> 27378271 |
S C Shen1, B B Chen2, H X Xue1, G Cao2, C J Li1, X X Wang1, Y P Hong1, G P Guo2, R F Dou1, C M Xiong1, L He1, J C Nie1.
Abstract
The fundamental parameters of the superconducting state such as coherence length and pairing strength are essential for understanding the nature of superconductivity. These parameters can be estimated by measuring critical parameters such as upper critical field, Hc2. In this work, Hc2 of a superconducting (110) LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface is determined through magnetoresistive measurements as a function of the gate voltage, VG. When VG increases, the critical temperature has a dome-like shape, while Hc2 monotonically decreases. This relationship of independence between the variation of Tc and of Hc2 suggests that the Cooper pairing potential is stronger in the underdoped region and the coherence length increases with the increase of VG. The result is as for high temperature superconducting cuprates and it is different than for conventional low temperature superconductors.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27378271 PMCID: PMC4932507 DOI: 10.1038/srep28379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The resistance Rs of the (110) LAO/STO interface as a function of temperature at three representative gate voltages and for B = 0 T.
The inset shows the gate voltage VG dependence of the critical temperature and of the normal state resistance Rn. The maximum of the (VG) curve is at 138 mK and at 25 V. Lines are guide to the eyes.
Figure 2(a) Curves of Rs(B) for −5 ≤ VG ≤ 200 V at 50 mK. The inset in the right corner shows determination of Rn, and . The inset in the left corner shows (VG) and (VG) curves at 50 mK; (b) Curves of dR/dB vs. B at 50 mK. Arrows indicate points of maximum of these curves and dashed line is guide for eyes. Magnetic field of a maximum point is defined as . The inset shows variation of as a function of VG.
Figure 3Temperature dependence of for different VG.
Lines are guide for the eyes.
Figure 4(a) SIM pattern: curves of Rs(B) at different temperatures for V= −5 V. Note the crossing point at 810 mT that defines the quantum critical point (QCP) with (Bc = 810 mT, Rc = 1297.54 Ω). The inset shows the bi-value curve obtained by collapse of the date by finite-size scaling analysis. (b) Curves of Rs(T) at different magnetic fields B and for VG = −5 V. Dashed line shows a plateau corresponding to QCP. Continuous lines are guide for the eyes.
Figure 5The V dependence of , (T = 0 K) (green diamonds) and .
(violet stars). The inset shows the V dependence of the coherence length where is the quantum flux. Continuous lines are guide for the eyes.