Literature DB >> 2737794

Bioequivalence studies: single vs multiple dose.

V W Steinijans1, R Sauter, J H Jonkman, H U Schulz, H Stricker, H Blume.   

Abstract

Bioequivalence of different preparations of the same drug substance has gained considerable importance over the last few years due to increasing generic substitution. The procedure that the manufacturer of the generic test preparation has to show bioequivalence with an appropriate reference preparation is scientifically accepted and laid down in international regulations. However, the necessity of single- vs multiple-dose bioequivalence studies has not been discussed in detail with the exception of the Dutch and US guidelines on sustained-release theophylline formulations, where multiple-dose studies are specifically required. This paper compares the conclusions drawn from single- and multiple-dose studies in the same subjects and recommends appropriate pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2737794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol        ISSN: 0174-4879


  4 in total

Review 1.  Controversies in bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  V W Steinijans; D Hauschke; J H Jonkman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Statistical Considerations in the Design of Biosimilar Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Chul Ahn; Seung-Chun Lee
Journal:  Ungyong Tonggye Yongu       Date:  2011-06-01

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in the context of in vitro/in vivo correlations.

Authors:  B Oosterhuis; J H Jonkman
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Bioinequivalence and drug toxicity. How great is the problem and what can be done?

Authors:  C H Gleiter; U Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.606

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.