Literature DB >> 27377301

Five-year follow-up of polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients presenting with st-elevation myocardial infarction.

Roisin Colleran1, Sebastian Kufner1, Yukinori Harada1, Daniele Giacoppo1, Salvatore Cassese1, Janika Repp1, Jens Wiebe1, Raphaela Lohaus1, Annalena Lahmann1, Simon Schneider2, Tareq Ibrahim2, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz2,3, Adnan Kastrati1,3, Robert A Byrne1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation are at increased risk of late adverse events, partly explained by an exaggerated inflammatory reaction to durable-polymer stent coatings.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether implantation of polymer-free DES would reduce this risk.
METHODS: In the ISAR-TEST 5 (the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic
Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents) trial, patients were randomly allocated to receive a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a new generation durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. We analyzed late clinical outcomes in the subgroup of patients presenting with STEMI. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization at 5 years.
RESULTS: 311 patients with STEMI were randomized to receive sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents (n = 215) or zotarolimus-eluting stents (n = 96). At 5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint in patients treated with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (18.3% versus 20.1% respectively, hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.51; P = 0.62). Rates of the individual components of the primary endpoint were also comparable in both groups. The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 1.4% versus 1.0% respectively (hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% CI, 0.14-12.94, P = 0.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes of patients with STEMI treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents were similar. Stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable in both treatment groups, with no events beyond 12 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT 00598533)
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STEMI; drug-eluting stent; long-term follow-up; probucol; randomized controlled trial; sirolimus; zotarolimus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27377301     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  1 in total

1.  Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents in a large-scale all-comers population.

Authors:  Florian Krackhardt; Viktor Kočka; Matthias W Waliszewski; Andreas Utech; Meik Lustermann; Martin Hudec; Martin Studenčan; Markus Schwefer; Jiangtao Yu; Myung Ho Jeong; Taehoon Ahn; Wan Azman Wan Ahmad; Michael Boxberger; André Schneider; Matthias Leschke
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-06-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.