Literature DB >> 27376871

Patient-reported outcome after radical cystectomy: translation and psychometric validation of the Swedish version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index.

Karin Stenzelius1,2, Anna-Karin Lind2, Jenny Wanegård2, Fredrik Liedberg2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Swedish version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index (FACT-VCI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For adaptation into Swedish, a multiprofessional team was used for translation including cultural adjustment, followed by back-translation. Test and retest in 10 individuals was followed by assessing metric properties in 75 consecutive patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. Reliability and internal consistency were measured by Cronbach's alpha. Face validity was tested with two laypersons and construct validity was tested by correlation to the dimensions in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - General (FACT-G).
RESULTS: The translated Swedish instrument showed validity and reliability similar to the original, and the results were comparable to published studies using FACT-VCI. The correlation between the VCI sum score and FACT-G dimensions was significant in all dimensions and the item-total correlation was over 0.3; therefore, the construct validity was acceptable. In addition, it was possible to detect differences in separate items in the translated version of FACT-VCI between age groups, type of diversion and those treated with chemotherapy, even though the samples were small.
CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish version of FACT-VCI is a valid and reliable instrument for use in the follow-up of patients with bladder cancer treated with urinary diversion. To measure changes after surgery, preoperative assessment with the related FACT-G instrument is advisable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; cystectomy; health-related quality of life; questionnaire; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27376871     DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1201857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  2 in total

Review 1.  Health Related Quality of life in bladder cancer. Current approach and future perspectives.

Authors:  Anamaria Truta; Tudor Adrian Hodor Popon; George Saraci; Liviu Ghervan; Ioan Victor Pop
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2017-07-15

2.  Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

Authors:  Samantha J Mason; James W F Catto; Amy Downing; Sarah E Bottomley; Adam W Glaser; Penny Wright
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.588

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.