Literature DB >> 27376784

Radiographer reporting in the UK: is the current scope of practice limiting plain-film reporting capacity?

Robert C Milner1, Gary Culpan2, Beverly Snaith1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To update knowledge on individual radiographer contribution to plain-film reporting workloads; to assess whether there is scope to further increase radiographer reporting capacity within this area.
METHODS: Reporting radiographers were invited to complete an online survey. Invitations were posted to every acute National Health Service trust in the UK whilst snowball sampling was employed via a network of colleagues, ex-colleagues and acquaintances. Information was sought regarding the demographics, geographical location and anatomical and referral scope of practice.
RESULTS: A total of 259 responses were received. 15.1% and 7.7% of respondents are qualified to report chest and abdomen radiographs, respectively. The mean time spent reporting per week is 14.5 h (range 1-37.5). 23.6% of radiographers report only referrals from emergency departments whilst 50.6% of radiographers have limitations on their practice.
CONCLUSION: The scope of practice of reporting radiographers has increased since previous studies; however, radiographer reporting of chest and abdomen radiographs has failed to progress in line with demand. There remain opportunities to increase radiographer capacity to assist the management of reporting backlogs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study is the first to examine demographic factors of reporting radiographers across the UK and is one of the largest in-depth studies of UK reporting radiographers, at individual level, to date.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27376784      PMCID: PMC5124925          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interpreting trauma radiographs.

Authors:  Maryann Hardy; Christine Barrett
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Brealey; A Scally; S Hahn; N Thomas; C Godfrey; A Coomarasamy
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Radiographers and trainee radiologists reporting accident radiographs: a comparative plain film-reading performance study.

Authors:  L Buskov; A Abild; A Christensen; O Holm; C Hansen; H Christensen
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Emergency nurse practitioners' perceptions of their role and scope of practice: is it advanced practice?

Authors:  Donna McConnell; Oliver D Slevin; Sonja J McIlfatrick
Journal:  Int Emerg Nurs       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 5.  Does radiography advanced practice improve patient outcomes and health service quality? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maryann Hardy; Louise Johnson; Rachael Sharples; Stephen Boynes; Donna Irving
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.039

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Increasing radiology capacity within the lung cancer pathway: centralised work-based support for trainee chest X-ray reporting radiographers.

Authors:  Nick Woznitza; Rebecca Steele; Keith Piper; Stephen Burke; Susan Rowe; Angshu Bhowmik; Sue Maughn; Kate Springett
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-05-27

2.  Diagnostic radiographer advanced clinical practice in the United Kingdom - A national cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Nick Woznitza; Lisa Pittock; James Elliott; Bev Snaith
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2021-06-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.