Literature DB >> 27376359

[Focal dose escalation in the treatment of prostate cancer : Long-term results of HDR brachytherapy].

J Cordes1, J Broschk2, M Sommerauer3, D Jocham2, A S Merseburger2, C Melchert4, G Kovács4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We prospectively examined the effect and the safety of intensity-modulated HDR brachytherapy (IMBT) with focal dose escalation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 139 patients undergoing primary therapy for prostate cancer and 11 patients with recurrence were included. Data analysis focused on the following factors: date of primary diagnosis, Gleason score, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, PSA nadir, volume of the prostate in the transrectal ultrasound, biopsy of the prostate gland, androgen deprivation, chemotherapy, uroflowmetry, pre- and postoperative post-void residual urine (PVR), number of the needles in the prostate lobes and analysis of follow-up data.
RESULTS: In the primary therapy group, 87.6 % of the patients had a PSA of 0-4 ng/ml at the time of follow-up, while in the recurrence group 81.8 % of patients were within this range. Overall, 55.8 % of patients in the primary group had a PSA nadir under 0.1 ng/ml, 37.2 % under 1 ng/ml, 5.8 % under 5 ng/ml and 1.2 % (1 patient) over 5 ng/ml. In the recurrence group, 100 % had a PSA nadir under 0.1 ng/dl. Fifty patients of the primary group reported grade 1 toxicity (Common Toxicity Criteria): 29 localized to the bladder and 21 to the rectum. Seventeen patients had grade 2 toxicity of the bladder and 1 patient had grade 3 toxicity of the bladder. Finally there was one grade 4 toxicity due to perforation of the sigmoid colon. In the recurrence group, 3 patients with grade 1 toxicity were observed (2 bladder and 1 bowl). Also 3 patients had grade 2 toxicity of the bladder, 1 patient had a grade 3 bladder toxicity and 1 patient had grade 4 toxicity due to bowl fistula. There were no grade 5 toxicities.
CONCLUSION: The modifications of the "Kiel method" with focal dose escalation was proven as effective in locally advanced prostate carcinoma and in local recurrences of the disease with low level toxicity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HDR-brachytherapy; Prostate cancer; Recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27376359     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0164-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  16 in total

1.  High dose rate brachytherapy boost treatment in radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  P J Hoskin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Factors affecting recurrence rates after prostatectomy or radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma patients with biopsy Gleason score 8 or above.

Authors:  Patrick A Kupelian; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Mohamed Elshaikh; Chandana A Reddy; Craig Zippe; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; James A Eastham; Angel M Cronin; Zvi Fuks; Zhigang Zhang; Yoshiya Yamada; Andrew Vickers; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Long-term outcome after elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics and local dose escalation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Razvan M Galalae; Gyoergy Kovács; Juergen Schultze; Tillmann Loch; Peter Rzehak; Roland Wilhelm; Hagen Bertermann; Britta Buschbeck; Peter Kohr; Bernhard Kimmig
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Comparative risk-adjusted mortality outcomes after primary surgery, radiotherapy, or androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Andrew J Vickers; Jeanette M Broering; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Is the α/β ratio for prostate tumours really low and does it vary with the level of risk at diagnosis?

Authors:  Jack F Fowler; Iuliana Toma-Dasu; Alexandru Dasu
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Salvage HDR brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after previous definitive radiation therapy: 5-year outcomes.

Authors:  Chien Peter Chen; Vivian Weinberg; Katsuto Shinohara; Mack Roach; Marc Nash; Alexander Gottschalk; Albert J Chang; I-Chow Hsu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  GEC/ESTRO recommendations on high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Peter J Hoskin; Alessandro Colombo; Ann Henry; Peter Niehoff; Taran Paulsen Hellebust; Frank-Andre Siebert; Gyorgy Kovacs
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  High-risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990-2007.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Janet Cowan; Jeannette M Broering; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Clinical outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and high dose-rate iridium 192 brachytherapy boost: a 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  Karl Mikael Kälkner; Thomas Wahlgren; Marianne Ryberg; Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark; Enrique Castellanos; Rolf Zimmerman; Josef Nilsson; Marie Lundell; Jack Fowler; Seymour Levitt; Magnus Hellström; Sten Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.