Literature DB >> 27375888

Crystal structure of 1,2-bis-[(1H-imidazol-2-yl)methylidene]hydrazine and its one-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network.

Chia-Hwa Lee1, Gene-Hsiang Lee2.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C8H8N6, two imidazolyl groups are separated by a zigzag -CH=N-N=CH- linkage. An inversion center is located at the mid-point of the N-N single bond and the complete molecule is generated by symmetry. In the crystal, each mol-ecule forms four N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds with two neighbouring mol-ecules to constitute a one-dimensional ladder-like structure propagating along the a-axis direction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; imidazole derivative; supra­molecular architecture

Year:  2016        PMID: 27375888      PMCID: PMC4910350          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Supra­molecular chemistry is a fascinating topic, and mol­ecular assemblies via inter­molecular non-covalent binding inter­actions (i.e. hydrogen bonding, ionic and π–π stacking inter­actions) have attracted much attentions in the field of crystal engineering over the last decade. In particular, hydrogen bonding, which is a powerful organizing force in designing a variety of supra­molecular and solid-state architectures (Subramanian & Zaworotko, 1994 ▸), is not only used extensively to generate numerous network structures consisting of discrete organic and organometallic compounds (Desiraju, 2000 ▸), but is also responsible for inter­esting physical properties of these supra­molecular arrangements, such as electrical, optical, magnetic, etc. (Bacchi & Pelagatti, 2016 ▸; Lindoy & Atkinson, 2000 ▸; Létard et al., 1998 ▸). Imidazoles, containing two nitro­gen atoms, possess both hydrogen-bond donating and accepting sites and are superior building blocks for supra­molecular architectures. Many imidazole-containing polydentate ligands derived from hydrazine find a wide range of applications in coordination chemistry owing to their chelating ability (Zhou et al., 2012 ▸). In this paper we report the synthesis of 1,2-bis­[(1H-imidazol-2-yl)methyl­ene]hydrazine (I), designed to consist of nitro­gen donors and acceptors, and the supra­molecular architecture it gives rise to via hydrogen bonds. The functionality of mol­ecule (I) as a bridge between metal centers for the formation of multi-dimensional structures will be discussed in subsequent publications.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound consists of two imidazolyl groups linked by a zigzag –CH=N—N=CH– linkage (Fig. 1 ▸) and with C5⋯C5i = 5.937 (3) Å [the distance between the centroids of the imidazolyl groups is 8.103 (3) Å]. The mol­ecule possesses an inversion center located in the mid-point of the N—N single bond and the complete molecule is generated by symmetry. The mol­ecule appears in a Z(EE)Z configuration and its geometry is similar to that of 1,2-bis­[(1H-imidazol-5-yl)methyl­ene]hydrazine (Pinto et al., 2013 ▸) and 1,2-bis­[(thio­phene-3-yl)methyl­ene]hydrazine (Kim & Lee, 2008 ▸).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of (I), showing the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y + 1, −z + 2.]

The mol­ecule (I) has a planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.012 Å) structure which, in addition to the observed bond distances, suggests partial delocalization of the π electrons over the whole mol­ecule. The geometric parameters, viz., the N—N single bond [N7—N7i = 1.409 (2) Å; symmetry code: (i) –x, −y + 1, −z + 2] , C=N double bond [C6—N7 = 1.2795 (19) Å] and C=N—N bond angle [C6=N7—N7i = 111.41 (15)°], are comparable to the corresponding parameters found in 1,4-bis­(3-pyrid­yl)-2,3-di­aza-1,3-butadiene [Dong et al., 2000 ▸] and 1,4-bis­(4-pyrid­yl)-2,3-di­aza-1,3-butadiene [Ciurtin et al., 2001 ▸].

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal structure of (I), each mol­ecule is involved in four N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (i.e.: two donor and two acceptor interactions) and inter­acts with two neighboring mol­ecules, resulting in a one-dimensional ladder-like structure along the a axis (Fig. 2 ▸). Numerical details of the hydrogen-bonding geometry are tabulated in Table 1 ▸.
Figure 2

A packing diagram for (I), viewed along the c axis. Dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds. [Symmetry code: (i) x + 1, y, z.]

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯N4i 0.95 (2)1.95 (2)2.8493 (17)157.9 (19)

Symmetry code: (i) .

As a comparison, the related compound 1,2-bis­[(1H-imidazol-5-yl)methyl­ene]hydrazine (Pinto et al., 2013 ▸) is a planar mol­ecule which constitutes corrugated layers parallel to the (101) plane, as a result of both hydrogen bonding and π–π stacking inter­actions with adjacent mol­ecules. In the present case of (I), instead, there are no significant π–π stacking inter­actions.

Synthesis and crystallization

A methanol solution (10 mL) of imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde (2.48 g, 25.8 mmol) was added to a methanol solution (10 mL) of hydrazine monohydrate (0.64 ml, 12.9 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 3 h and the precipitate was collected by filtration. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction studies were obtained by diffusion of diethyl ether into a DMSO solution of the title compound (I). Yield: 2.21 g (91%).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All the H atoms were located in difference-Fourier maps. For the H atom bounded to atom N1, the atomic coordinates and U iso were refined, giving an N—H distance of 0.95 (2) Å. The C-bound H atoms were subsequently treated as riding atoms in geometrically idealized positions: C—H distances of 0.95 Å with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H8N6
M r 188.20
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)5.0618 (3), 14.6282 (8), 6.1294 (4)
β (°)106.321 (2)
V3)435.56 (5)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.35 × 0.10 × 0.03
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D8 VENTURE
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015)
T min, T max 0.702, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections2614, 999, 903
R int 0.014
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.650
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.042, 0.117, 1.12
No. of reflections999
No. of parameters68
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.31, −0.26

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2015 ▸), SHELXS97 and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸) and SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016004497/bg2582Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1468833 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H8N6F(000) = 196
Mr = 188.20Dx = 1.435 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.0618 (3) ÅCell parameters from 2074 reflections
b = 14.6282 (8) Åθ = 2.8–27.5°
c = 6.1294 (4) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 106.321 (2)°T = 150 K
V = 435.56 (5) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 20.35 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm
Bruker D8 VENTURE diffractometer903 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.014
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015)θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.8°
Tmin = 0.702, Tmax = 0.746h = −6→6
2614 measured reflectionsk = −18→19
999 independent reflectionsl = −7→6
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.117w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0528P)2 + 0.2863P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.12(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
999 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
68 parametersΔρmin = −0.26 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N1−0.1374 (2)0.62851 (8)0.4802 (2)0.0175 (3)
H10.055 (5)0.6193 (14)0.515 (4)0.037 (6)*
C2−0.2801 (3)0.67725 (10)0.2944 (2)0.0204 (4)
H2−0.20820.70440.18230.025*
C3−0.5481 (3)0.67920 (10)0.3022 (2)0.0197 (3)
H3−0.69560.70840.19370.024*
N4−0.5714 (2)0.63279 (8)0.4899 (2)0.0187 (3)
C5−0.3193 (3)0.60313 (10)0.5944 (2)0.0162 (3)
C6−0.2539 (3)0.55035 (10)0.8020 (2)0.0180 (3)
H6−0.39750.53360.86590.022*
N7−0.0068 (3)0.52574 (8)0.9014 (2)0.0195 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0139 (6)0.0223 (6)0.0170 (6)0.0001 (5)0.0052 (5)0.0008 (5)
C20.0187 (7)0.0264 (8)0.0165 (7)0.0001 (6)0.0055 (5)0.0039 (5)
C30.0168 (7)0.0227 (7)0.0187 (7)0.0013 (5)0.0037 (5)0.0040 (5)
N40.0152 (6)0.0220 (6)0.0188 (6)0.0006 (5)0.0046 (5)0.0027 (5)
C50.0141 (7)0.0180 (7)0.0167 (7)−0.0007 (5)0.0049 (5)−0.0013 (5)
C60.0166 (7)0.0205 (7)0.0173 (7)−0.0005 (5)0.0054 (5)0.0004 (5)
N70.0198 (6)0.0224 (6)0.0159 (6)0.0003 (5)0.0043 (5)0.0030 (5)
N1—C51.3557 (18)C3—H30.9500
N1—C21.3656 (18)N4—C51.3295 (18)
N1—H10.95 (2)C5—C61.445 (2)
C2—C31.371 (2)C6—N71.2795 (19)
C2—H20.9500C6—H60.9500
C3—N41.3689 (19)N7—N7i1.409 (2)
C5—N1—C2107.26 (12)C5—N4—C3105.60 (12)
C5—N1—H1130.4 (13)N4—C5—N1111.18 (13)
C2—N1—H1122.3 (13)N4—C5—C6123.37 (13)
N1—C2—C3106.15 (12)N1—C5—C6125.46 (13)
N1—C2—H2126.9N7—C6—C5121.43 (13)
C3—C2—H2126.9N7—C6—H6119.3
N4—C3—C2109.81 (13)C5—C6—H6119.3
N4—C3—H3125.1C6—N7—N7i111.41 (15)
C2—C3—H3125.1
C5—N1—C2—C3−0.35 (16)C2—N1—C5—N40.38 (17)
N1—C2—C3—N40.21 (17)C2—N1—C5—C6−179.95 (14)
C2—C3—N4—C50.02 (17)N4—C5—C6—N7−177.58 (13)
C3—N4—C5—N1−0.25 (16)N1—C5—C6—N72.8 (2)
C3—N4—C5—C6−179.93 (13)C5—C6—N7—N7i−179.35 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···N4ii0.95 (2)1.95 (2)2.8493 (17)157.9 (19)
  7 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Gyroidal metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Xiao-Ping Zhou; Mian Li; Jie Liu; Dan Li
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Two versatile N,N'-bipyridine-type ligands for preparing organic-inorganic coordination polymers: new cobalt- and nickel-containing framework materials.

Authors:  D M Ciurtin; Y B Dong; M D Smith; T Barclay; H C zur Loye
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2001-06-04       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Structural, Magnetic, and Photomagnetic Studies of a Mononuclear Iron(II) Derivative Exhibiting an Exceptionally Abrupt Spin Transition. Light-Induced Thermal Hysteresis Phenomenon.

Authors:  Jean-François Létard; Philippe Guionneau; Louis Rabardel; Judith A. K. Howard; Andres E. Goeta; Daniel Chasseau; Olivier Kahn
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  1998-08-24       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  The structure of azines derived from C-formyl-1H-imidazoles in solution and in the solid state: tautomerism, configurational and conformational studies.

Authors:  Joana Pinto; Vera L M Silva; Artur M S Silva; Rosa M Claramunt; Dionisia Sanz; M Carmen Torralba; M Rosario Torres; Felipe Reviriego; Ibon Alkorta; José Elguero
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Organometallic chemistry meets crystal engineering to give responsive crystalline materials.

Authors:  A Bacchi; P Pelagatti
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.