Literature DB >> 27375813

Refinement of current monitoring methodology for electroosmotic flow assessment under low ionic strength conditions.

Mario A Saucedo-Espinosa1, Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas1.   

Abstract

Current monitoring is a well-established technique for the characterization of electroosmotic (EO) flow in microfluidic devices. This method relies on monitoring the time response of the electric current when a test buffer solution is displaced by an auxiliary solution using EO flow. In this scheme, each solution has a different ionic concentration (and electric conductivity). The difference in the ionic concentration of the two solutions defines the dynamic time response of the electric current and, hence, the current signal to be measured: larger concentration differences result in larger measurable signals. A small concentration difference is needed, however, to avoid dispersion at the interface between the two solutions, which can result in undesired pressure-driven flow that conflicts with the EO flow. Additional challenges arise as the conductivity of the test solution decreases, leading to a reduced electric current signal that may be masked by noise during the measuring process, making for a difficult estimation of an accurate EO mobility. This contribution presents a new scheme for current monitoring that employs multiple channels arranged in parallel, producing an increase in the signal-to-noise ratio of the electric current to be measured and increasing the estimation accuracy. The use of this parallel approach is particularly useful in the estimation of the EO mobility in systems where low conductivity mediums are required, such as insulator based dielectrophoresis devices.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27375813      PMCID: PMC4902815          DOI: 10.1063/1.4953183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  25 in total

1.  Dielectrophoretic manipulation of particle mixtures employing asymmetric insulating posts.

Authors:  Mario A Saucedo-Espinosa; Alexandra LaLonde; Aytug Gencoglu; Maria F Romero-Creel; Jay R Dolas; Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Isolation and enrichment of low abundant particles with insulator-based dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  Alexandra LaLonde; Maria F Romero-Creel; Mario A Saucedo-Espinosa; Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Superpositioned dielectrophoresis for enhanced trapping efficiency.

Authors:  Fredrik Aldaeus; Yuan Lin; Johan Roeraade; Gustav Amberg
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Zeta-potential measurement using the Smoluchowski equation and the slope of the current-time relationship in electroosmotic flow.

Authors:  Alice Sze; David Erickson; Liqing Ren; Dongqing Li
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 8.128

5.  Quantitative analysis by microchip capillary electrophoresis: current limitations and problem-solving strategies.

Authors:  Tobias Revermann; Sebastian Götz; Jens Künnemeyer; Uwe Karst
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  Characterization of electrokinetic mobility of microparticles in order to improve dielectrophoretic concentration.

Authors:  José I Martínez-López; Héctor Moncada-Hernández; Javier L Baylon-Cardiel; Sergio O Martínez-Chapa; Marco Rito-Palomares; Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Effect of insulating posts geometry on particle manipulation in insulator based dielectrophoretic devices.

Authors:  Alexandra Lalonde; Aytug Gencoglu; Maria F Romero-Creel; Karuna S Koppula; Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.759

8.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  D C Duffy; J C McDonald; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Quantification of pH gradients and implications in insulator-based dielectrophoresis of biomolecules.

Authors:  Aytug Gencoglu; Fernanda Camacho-Alanis; Vi Thanh Nguyen; Asuka Nakano; Alexandra Ros; Adrienne R Minerick
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 10.  Zeta potential and electroosmotic mobility in microfluidic devices fabricated from hydrophobic polymers: 2. Slip and interfacial water structure.

Authors:  Vishal Tandon; Brian J Kirby
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.535

View more
  6 in total

1.  Preface to Special Topic: Selected Papers from the 2015 Annual Meeting of the AES Electrophoresis Society in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Authors:  Nathan S Swami; Michael Hughes
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Low frequency cyclical potentials for fine tuning insulator-based dielectrophoretic separations.

Authors:  Cody J Lentz; Samuel Hidalgo-Caballero; Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Particle trapping in electrically driven insulator-based microfluidics: Dielectrophoresis and induced-charge electrokinetics.

Authors:  Victor H Perez-Gonzalez
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.595

4.  Electrokinetic instability in microchannel ferrofluid/water co-flows.

Authors:  Le Song; Liandong Yu; Yilong Zhou; Asher Reginald Antao; Rama Aravind Prabhakaran; Xiangchun Xuan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Enhanced Throughput for Electrokinetic Manipulation of Particles and Cells in a Stacked Microfluidic Device.

Authors:  Lin Zhu; Saurin H Patel; Mark Johnson; Akshay Kale; Yash Raval; Tzuen-Rong Tzeng; Xiangchun Xuan
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Fine-Tuning Electrokinetic Injections Considering Nonlinear Electrokinetic Effects in Insulator-Based Devices.

Authors:  Abbi Miller; Nicole Hill; Kel Hakim; Blanca H Lapizco-Encinas
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.891

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.