| Literature DB >> 27375072 |
J R Scalea1, R R Redfield1, E Arpali1, G E Leverson1, R J Bennett2, M E Anderson2, D B Kaufman1, L A Fernandez1, A M D'Alessandro1, D P Foley1, J D Mezrich1.
Abstract
For donation after circulatory death (DCD), many centers allow 1 h after treatment withdrawal to donor death for kidneys. Our center has consistently allowed 2 h. We hypothesized that waiting longer would be associated with worse outcome. A single-center, retrospective analysis of DCD kidneys transplanted between 2008 and 2013 as well as a nationwide survey of organ procurement organization DCD practices were conducted. We identified 296 DCD kidneys, of which 247 (83.4%) were transplanted and 49 (16.6%) were discarded. Of the 247 recipients, 225 (group 1; 91.1%) received kidneys with a time to death (TTD) of 0-1 h; 22 (group 2; 8.9%) received grafts with a TTD of 1-2 h. Five-year patient survival was 88.8% for group 1, and 83.9% for group 2 (p = 0.667); Graft survival was also similar, with 5-year survival of 74.1% for group 1, and 83.9% for group 2 (p = 0.507). The delayed graft function rate was the same in both groups (50.2% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.984). TTD was not predictive of graft failure. Nationally, the average maximum wait-time for DCD kidneys was 77.2 min. By waiting 2 h for DCD kidneys, we performed 9.8% more transplants without worse outcomes. Nationally, this practice would allow for hundreds of additional kidney transplants, annually. © Copyright 2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.Entities:
Keywords: clinical research/practice; donors and donation: deceased; donors and donation: donation after circulatory death (DCD); health services and outcomes research; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ allocation; organ procurement; organ procurement and allocation; organ procurement organization
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27375072 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086