| Literature DB >> 27374115 |
Alec Morton1, Amanda I Adler2, David Bell3, Andrew Briggs4, Werner Brouwer5, Karl Claxton6, Neil Craig7, Alastair Fischer8, Peter McGregor1, Pieter van Baal5.
Abstract
In this editorial, we consider the vexing issue of 'unrelated future costs' (for example, the costs of caring for people with dementia or kidney failure after preventing their deaths from a heart attack). The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance is not to take such costs into account in technology appraisals. However, standard appraisal practice involves modelling the benefits of those unrelated technologies. We argue that there is a sound principled reason for including both the costs and benefits of unrelated care. Changing this practice would have material consequences for decisions about reimbursing particular technologies, and we urge future research to understand this better.Entities:
Keywords: cost effectiveness analysis; costing; economic analysis; health technology assessment; unrelated future costs
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27374115 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Econ ISSN: 1057-9230 Impact factor: 3.046