Literature DB >> 27373990

Parenchymal Airspace Profiling: Sensitive Quantification and Characterization of Lung Structure Evaluating Parenchymal Destruction.

Rui Xiao1, Monica P Goldklang1, Jeanine M D'Armiento1.   

Abstract

Lung morphometry was introduced over 50 years ago to provide quantitative evaluation of the lung structure. The existing parameters, such as mean linear intercept and destructive index, suffer from simplistic data interpretation and a subjective data acquisition process. To overcome these existing shortcomings, parenchymal airspace profiling (PAP) was developed to provide a more detailed and unbiased quantitative method. Following the standard protocols of fixation, embedding, and sectioning, lung micrographs were: (1) marked with nonparenchymal area, preprocessed, and binarized under the researcher's supervision; (2) analyzed with a statistical learning method, Gaussian mixture model, to provide an unbiased categorization of parenchymal airspace compartments, corresponding to a single alveolus, alveolar sac, and ductal/destructive airspace; and (3) further quantified into morphometric parameters, including reference volume, alveolar count, and ductal/destructive fraction (DF) based on stereological principles. PAP was performed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained lung sections from mice and rabbits. Unbiased categorization revealed differences in alveolar size among several mouse strains (NZW/LacJ<AKR/J<A/J<C57BL/6J) and across species (mouse<rabbit). Further quantification indicates that parenchymal destruction, modeled in mouse lungs with 1-month smoke exposure, resulted in decreased alveolar count, increased DF, but no significant differences in mean linear intercept. DF also provides a robust measurement that is not biased by processing artifacts, magnification, or reference volume, which are common limitations in human lung biopsies or data obtained from different laboratories. PAP is a novel approach to lung morphometry that offers more detailed characterization of the lung structure, sensitivity, and robustness than presently used methods for evaluating parenchymal destruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer vision; lung morphometry; parenchymal airspace profiling; statistical learning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27373990      PMCID: PMC5105186          DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0143OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol        ISSN: 1044-1549            Impact factor:   6.914


  15 in total

1.  The destructive index and early lung destruction in smokers.

Authors:  D H Eidelman; H Ghezzo; W D Kim; M G Cosio
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-07

2.  Calculation of the internal surface of a lung.

Authors:  H CAMPBELL; S I TOMKEIEFF
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1952-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An official research policy statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: standards for quantitative assessment of lung structure.

Authors:  Connie C W Hsia; Dallas M Hyde; Matthias Ochs; Ewald R Weibel
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Automated High-Performance Analysis of Lung Morphometry.

Authors:  Céline Sallon; Denis Soulet; Pierre R Provost; Yves Tremblay
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.914

5.  Activation of the TLR4 signaling pathway and abnormal cholesterol efflux lead to emphysema in ApoE-deficient mice.

Authors:  Monica Goldklang; Polina Golovatch; Tina Zelonina; Jordis Trischler; Daniel Rabinowitz; Vincent Lemaître; Jeanine D'Armiento
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 5.464

6.  Quantitative methods in the study of pulmonary pathology.

Authors:  M S Dunnill
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Structural emphysema does not correlate with lung compliance: lessons from the mouse smoking model.

Authors:  Robert F Foronjy; Becky A Mercer; Mark W Maxfield; Charles A Powell; Jeanine D'Armiento; Yasunori Okada
Journal:  Exp Lung Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  The "destructive index" in nonemphysematous and emphysematous lungs. Morphologic observations and correlation with function.

Authors:  K Saito; P Cagle; N Berend; W M Thurlbeck
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1989-02

9.  Destructive index: a measurement of lung parenchymal destruction in smokers.

Authors:  M Saetta; R J Shiner; G E Angus; W D Kim; N S Wang; M King; H Ghezzo; M G Cosio
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1985-05

10.  Morphological quantification of emphysema in small human lung specimens: comparison of methods and relation with clinical data.

Authors:  Antoine A Robbesom; Elly M M Versteeg; Jacques H Veerkamp; J Han J M van Krieken; Hans J Bulten; Hans T J Smits; Luuk N A Willems; Cees L A van Herwaarden; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Toin H van Kuppevelt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.842

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reply: Parenchymal Airspace Profiling Has Its Merits and Is a Valuable Addition to Existing Methods for Lung Morphometry.

Authors:  Rui Xiao; Monica P Goldklang; Jeanine M D'Armiento
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.914

2.  Does Biliodigestive Anastomosis Have Any Effect on the Reversal of Hepatopulmonary Syndrome in a Biliary Cirrhosis Experimental Model?

Authors:  Leonardo Ervolino Corbi; Ana Cristina Aoun Tannuri; Maria Julia de Aro Braz; Vitor Ribeiro Paes; Lourenço Sbragia; Rebeca Lopes Figueira; Karina Miura da Costa; Maria Cecilia Mendonça Coelho; Josiane Oliveira Gonçalves; Suellen Serafini; Uenis Tannuri
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Airway Resistance Caused by Sphingomyelin Synthase 2 Insufficiency in Response to Cigarette Smoke.

Authors:  Gayatri Gupta; Nathalie Baumlin; Justin Poon; Begum Ahmed; Yeun-Po Chiang; Christopher Railwah; Michael D Kim; Melissa Rivas; Hannah Goldenberg; Ziyad Elgamal; Matthias Salathe; Apurav A Panwala; Abdoulaye Dabo; Chongmin Huan; Robert Foronjy; Xian-Cheng Jiang; Raj Wadgaonkar; Patrick Geraghty
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.914

4.  Cigarette smoke induction of S100A9 contributes to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Christopher Railwah; Alnardo Lora; Kanza Zahid; Hannah Goldenberg; Michael Campos; Anne Wyman; Bakr Jundi; Magdalena Ploszaj; Melissa Rivas; Abdoulaye Dabo; Susan M Majka; Robert Foronjy; Mohamed El Gazzar; Patrick Geraghty
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 5.464

5.  Knockdown of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin with antisense oligonucleotide does not exacerbate smoke induced lung injury.

Authors:  Kyle Stearns; Monica Goldklang; Rui Xiao; Tina Zelonina; Keith Blomenkamp; Jeffery Teckman; Jeanine M D'Armiento
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mmp12 Is Upregulated by in utero Second-Hand Smoke Exposures and Is a Key Factor Contributing to Aggravated Lung Responses in Adult Emphysema, Asthma, and Lung Cancer Mouse Models.

Authors:  Alexandra Noël; Zakia Perveen; Rui Xiao; Harriet Hammond; Viviana Le Donne; Kelsey Legendre; Manas Ranjan Gartia; Sushant Sahu; Daniel B Paulsen; Arthur L Penn
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Protein Phosphatase 2A Reduces Cigarette Smoke-induced Cathepsin S and Loss of Lung Function.

Authors:  Declan F Doherty; Sridesh Nath; Justin Poon; Robert F Foronjy; Michael Ohlmeyer; Abdoulaye J Dabo; Matthias Salathe; Mark Birrell; Maria Belvisi; Nathalie Baumlin; Michael D Kim; Sinéad Weldon; Clifford Taggart; Patrick Geraghty
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.