Literature DB >> 27373975

A negative stimulus movement effect in pigeons.

Thomas A Daniel1, Jeffrey S Katz2.   

Abstract

Rhesus monkeys and humans perform more accurately in matching-to-sample tasks when the sample stimulus moves through space (Washburn et al., 1989; Washburn, 1993). This Stimulus Movement Effect (SME) is believed to be due to movement increasing attention toward the sample stimulus, creating an easier discrimination between the sample and choice stimuli. To date, there is no evidence for this phenomenon in a non-mammalian species. In the current study, we investigate the possibility of an SME in an avian species. Across three experiments, pigeons were tested with moving and stationary sample stimuli in a non-matching- to-sample task. The area and velocity by which the sample stimulus traveled was manipulated but no advantage for moving over stationary sample trials was found within or across sessions. Even when a delay condition was implemented, there was no advantage for moving sample trials. Contrary to the results found in humans and monkeys, pigeons performed better when the sample was stationary, a negative SME, and no evidence was found that stimulus movement increases discrimination performance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrimination learning; Nonmatching-to-sample; Oddity-from-sample; Selective attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27373975     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  2 in total

Review 1.  Touchscreen technology in the study of cognition-related behavior.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; Jack Bergman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Tracking of unpredictable moving stimuli by pigeons.

Authors:  Anna Wilkinson; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.