Literature DB >> 27373829

EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis in a large series of Italian non-small cell lung cancer patients: 2,387 cases from a single center.

Riccardo Giannini1, Cristiana Lupi2, Elisa Sensi2, Greta Alì2, Agnese Proietti2, Laura Boldrini1, Adele Servadio1, Mirella Giordano1, Elisabetta Macerola1, Rossella Bruno1, Nicla Borrelli1, Antonio Chella3, Franca Melfi4, Marco Lucchi1, Alessandro Ribechini5, Enrico Vasile6, Federico Cappuzzo7, Alfredo Mussi1, Gabriella Fontanini1.   

Abstract

Activating EGFR mutations are important genetic alterations that have strong therapeutic implications for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the role of KRAS mutations in this process is still under evaluation. Here, we report on the feasibility of a large‑scale EGFR and KRAS mutation analysis in the daily routine of a single center. NSCLCs from 2,387 patients were screened for EGFR and KRAS mutations from January 2010 to September 2015. Mutational analyses were performed in a single laboratory using single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP)-Sanger sequencing and matrix‑assisted laser desorption ionization‑time of flight (MALDI‑TOF) on Sequenom platform for EGFR and pyrosequencing for KRAS. Activating EGFR mutations were found in 14.1% of all tumors, whereas KRAS mutations were found in 30.5% of all tumors. Direct sequencing showed analyzable cytological, small biopsy and surgical specimen percentages of 90.3, 90.9 and 98.1%, respectively, whereas the MALDI‑TOF platform showed analyzable cytological samples, small biopsies and surgical specimens percentages of 94.6, 95.7 and 96.9%, respectively. The mean analytical turnaround times (TAT) were 4 and 3 days for direct sequencing and the MALDI‑TOF platform, respectively. Our results confirm that small biopsy or cytological samples can be used for reliable EGFR and KRAS mutation testing and indicate that adopting the MALDI‑TOF platform reduces the rate of missed samples among the samples. Moreover, the 3-day analytical TAT of the MALDI-TOF multi-target technique is appropriate for clinical management and reduces the overall treatment decision time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27373829     DOI: 10.3892/or.2016.4874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1021-335X            Impact factor:   3.906


  3 in total

Review 1.  Liquid biopsy in early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Pérez-Ramírez; Marisa Cañadas-Garre; Ana I Robles; Miguel Ángel Molina; María José Faus-Dáder; Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10

2.  Anchored Multiplex PCR Custom Melanoma Next Generation Sequencing Panel for Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA.

Authors:  Russell J Diefenbach; Jenny H Lee; Ashleigh Stewart; Alexander M Menzies; Matteo S Carlino; Robyn P M Saw; Jonathan R Stretch; Georgina V Long; Richard A Scolyer; Helen Rizos
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Non-small cell lung cancer in China.

Authors:  Peixin Chen; Yunhuan Liu; Yaokai Wen; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.