Literature DB >> 27373823

Influence of graft ischemic time and geographic distance between donor and recipient on survival in children after lung transplantation.

Don Hayes1, Brian F Joy2, Susan D Reynolds3, Joseph D Tobias4, Dmitry Tumin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal ischemic time in pediatric lung transplantation (LTx) is unclear, as recent studies have challenged the relevance of 6 hours as an upper limit to acceptable ischemic time.
METHODS: Pediatric LTx recipients transplanted between 1987 and 2013 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry to compare survival according to ischemic time, which was categorized as <4 hours, 4 to 6 hours and >6 hours.
RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty patients, all <18 years of age and receiving a first-time LTx from a cadaveric donor, were included in our investigation. Compared with <4 hours of ischemic time, univariate analysis showed a significant reduction in mortality hazard with 4 to 6 hours (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.640; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.502 to 0.816; p < 0.001) but not >6 hours (HR = 0.985; 95% CI 0.755 to 1.284; p = 0.909). A multivariate Cox model confirmed the lowest mortality hazard to be 4 to 6 hours, as compared with <4 hours (HR = 0.533; 95% CI 0.376 to 0.755; p < 0.001). A prolonged ischemic time of >6 hours was associated with increased mortality hazard relative to the 4 to 6 hours (HR = 1.613; 95% CI 1.193 to 2.181; p = 0.002). Supplementary analyses examining geographic distance between donor and recipient identified no association between geographic distance and recipient mortality hazard.
CONCLUSIONS: An ischemic time of 4 to 6 hours was associated with optimal long-term survival in first-time pediatric LTx recipients, whereas a very short ischemic time of <4 hours and a prolonged ischemic time >6 hours were both associated with higher mortality hazard in this population.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  donor; geographic distance; ischemic time; lung transplantation; recipient; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27373823     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  3 in total

Review 1.  Immunosuppression Drug Therapy in Lung Transplantation for Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Pamela Burcham; Lisa Sarzynski; Sabrina Khalfoun; Kimberly J Novak; Julie C Miller; Dmitry Tumin; Don Hayes
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-third pediatric lung transplantation report - 2020; focus on deceased donor characteristics.

Authors:  Don Hayes; Michael O Harhay; Wida S Cherikh; Daniel C Chambers; Kiran K Khush; Eileen Hsich; Luciano Potena; Aparna Sadavarte; Tajinder P Singh; Andreas Zuckermann; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Differences in Travel Time to Cancer Surgery for Colon versus Rectal Cancer in a Rural State: A New Method for Analyzing Time-to-Place Data Using Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin A Matthews; Amanda R Kahl; Anne H Gaglioti; Mary E Charlton
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.667

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.