Literature DB >> 27373751

Influence of enrichment and isolation media on the detection of Campylobacter spp. in naturally contaminated chicken samples.

E Repérant1, M J Laisney2, B Nagard2, S Quesne2, S Rouxel2, F Le Gall2, M Chemaly2, M Denis2.   

Abstract

Investigating Campylobacter epidemiology requires adequate technique and media to ensure optimal culturing and accurate detection and isolation of Campylobacter strains. In the present study, we investigated the performances of three enrichment durations in Bolton broth (0, 24 and 48h) and compared four isolation media (mCCDA, Karmali, Butzler no. 2 and CampyFood agar (CFA)) for the detection of Campylobacter positive samples and the identification of Campylobacter species, from naturally contaminated broiler chicken samples (caeca, neck skin from carcasses, and skin from thighs). We compared our local results to those we obtained with samples from a European survey (caeca and neck skin) and a national survey (neck skin, thigh skin, and breast). Direct plating favored the detection of positive samples highly contaminated by Campylobacter (caeca and neck skin from carcasses) whatever the media. A longer enrichment reduced the rates of Campylobacter recovery except when using Butzler no. 2, more particularly for neck skin which background microflora was less important than in caeca. As a matter of fact, enrichment allowed a higher detection rate of positive samples with low Campylobacter contamination levels (breast, thigh skin), this detection being enhanced when using Butzler no. 2. When comparing the 3 other selective media, CFA was the 2nd most efficient media prior to mCCDA and Karmali. Interestingly, enrichment promoted the growth of Campylobacter coli but this promotion was least with Butzler no. 2 agar. Our study has confirmed the need to adapt the method to the types of samples for improving the detection of Campylobacter and that the method may affect the prevalence of the species.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter; Detection method; Enrichment; Selective media

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27373751     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  3 in total

1.  Campylobacteriosis, Shigellosis and Salmonellosis in Hospitalized Children with Acute Inflammatory Diarrhea in Georgia.

Authors:  Maia Metreveli; Salome Bulia; Iamze Shalamberidze; Liana Tevzadze; Shota Tsanava; Juan Cruz Goenaga; Kerstin Stingl; Paata Imnadze
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  Virulence Profiling, Multidrug Resistance and Molecular Mechanisms of Campylobacter Strains from Chicken Carcasses in Tunisia.

Authors:  Awatef Béjaoui; Manel Gharbi; Sarra Bitri; Dorsaf Nasraoui; Wassim Ben Aziza; Kais Ghedira; Maryem Rfaik; Linda Marzougui; Abdeljelil Ghram; Abderrazek Maaroufi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  Evaluation of potassium clavulanate supplementation of Bolton broth for enrichment and detection of Campylobacter from chicken.

Authors:  Bai Wei; Min Kang; Hyung-Kwan Jang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.