Literature DB >> 27373398

Comparability of an image-guided system with other instruments in measuring corneal keratometry and astigmatism.

Michael Schultz1, Uwe Oberheide1, Omid Kermani2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test whether keratometry (K) and astigmatism measurements provided by the Verion Reference Unit (an image-guided system) compared well with the Tonoref II automated tonometer-refractometer, IOLMaster partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer, AL-Scan optical biometer, Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera, and OPD Scan III wavefront aberrometer.
SETTING: Augenklinik am Neumarkt, Cologne, Germany.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Patients having routine cataract surgery had standard preoperative assessment including biometry measurement with all study devices. The K values, power of astigmatism, axis, and the lens power of an imaginary intraocular lens (IOL) were analyzed for each device.
RESULTS: One hundred five eyes of 62 patients with a mean age of 68.5 years ± 11.9 (SD) (range 27.2 to 89.7 years) were included in the study. The mean differences in flat K readings between the image-guided system and the tonometer-refractometer, PCI biometer, optical biometer (2.4 and 3.2 mm), rotating Scheimpflug camera, and wavefront aberrometer were -0.03 mm, 0.00 mm, 0.01 mm (both 2.4 and 3.2 mm), -0.03 mm, and -0.01 mm, respectively (P < .001). Differences were slightly greater for steep K readings as follows: -0.04 mm, -0.01 mm, -0.02 (optical biometer 2.4 mm), -0.03 mm (optical biometer 3.2 mm), -0.04 mm, and -0.06 mm, respectively (P < .001). The calculated power of an imaginary IOL from the study devices fell within 0.28 diopter of one another (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The image-guided system compared well with and provided astigmatism measurements similar to those of currently available diagnostic measurement devices. This system can aid appropriate preoperative IOL power calculations. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Drs. Schultz, Oberheide, and Kermani have received honoraria from Alcon Pharma GmbH for corporate presentations.
Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27373398     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  3 in total

1.  Toric intraocular lens versus limbal relaxing incisions for corneal astigmatism after phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Jonathan C Lake; Gustavo Victor; Gerry Clare; Gustavo Jm Porfírio; Ashleigh Kernohan; Jennifer R Evans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-17

2.  Comparison of corneal power obtained from VERION image-guided surgery system and four other devices.

Authors:  Hung-Yuan Lin; Hsin-Yang Chen; Han Bor Fam; Ya-Jung Chuang; Ronald Yeoh; Pi-Jung Lin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-12

Review 3.  A Review of Smartphone Apps Used for Toric Intraocular Lens Calculation and Alignment.

Authors:  Yarrow Scantling-Birch; Hasan Naveed; Ritika Mukhija; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.