Literature DB >> 27372966

BIRC5 Genomic Copy Number Variation in Early-Onset Breast Cancer.

Kimia Ghaffari1, Mehrdad Hashemi1, Elmira Ebrahimi2, Reza Shirkoohi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5 (BIRC5) gene is an inhibitor of apoptosis that expresses in human embryonic tissues but it is absent in most healthy adult tissues. The copy number of BIRC5 has been indicated to be highly increased in tumor tissues; however, its association with the age of onset in breast cancer is not well understood.
METHODS: Forty tumor tissues of breast cancer were obtained from Tumor Bank of Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran. BIRC5 gene copy number variation (CNV) was evaluated using Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and then compared with the age of onset for each patient.
RESULTS: BIRC5 amplification was seen in 17.5% of cases. Also, a significant association was observed between BIRC5 gene amplification and individuals under 40 years of age (P=0.04).
CONCLUSION: BIRC5 gene has the potential to be a marker for the detection and prognosis of cancer at an early age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplification; BIRC5; Breast cancer; MLPA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27372966      PMCID: PMC4983680          DOI: 10.7508/ibj.2016.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran Biomed J        ISSN: 1028-852X


INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is an important health problem worldwide, and it is the second most common cancer among populations in both developed and developing countries. In Iran, breast cancer comprises 21.4% of female cancers[1]. There are several factors that can affect breast cancer prognosis. One of these factors is gene copy number variation (CNV)[2,3]. CNV changes have been introduced as an influential feature in human phenotypes and clinical diseases[4,5]. Genome copy number alterations are important factors in tumor development[6]. Since the result of cancer treatment depends on the early diagnosis of the disease, CNV determination in genes involved in cancer may be an effective step in the early detection of breast cancer[7]. Accumulating evidence suggests that breast cancer in patients under 40 is more aggressive and associated with poor outcome than in their older counterparts[8]. As there is an increasing outbreak of the disease in Iran, which is usually detected at advanced stages, the early detection of breast cancer would be helpful in reducing the mortality rate and improving patients’ prognosis[9,10]. Genomic changes, including increase in the expression levels or copy number of those genes which are involved in mitosis, cell cycle progression, embryogenesis, DNA reproduction, cell division, and proliferation, have been shown that are effective in development and progression of breast cancer[11-13]. Baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5 (BIRC5) gene, also known as survivin, is a family member of the inhibitors of apoptosis. There are two copies of the aforementioned gene in the entire normal diploid cells that are located on 17q25 chromosome. The BIRC5 gene product is supposed to play a role in the prevention of apoptosis. It is also known that this gene participates in cell cycle progression and assists the cells to go through the cell cycle checkpoints. This gene has an important function both in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. In a study on pancreatic cancer, BIRC5 gene amplification has been reported[14]. BIRC5 gene amplification was also observed in lung cancer using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique[15]. In this regard, BIRC5 may have the potential to be considered as a therapeutic target in cancer. With regard to the fact that BIRC5 is expressed at the embryonic stage but its expression is absent in normal adult tissues, changes in the copy number of this gene can possibly be effective in development and progression of cancer by preventing apoptosis in cells. Hence, this study was conducted to determine the association between BIRC5 genomic copy number variation and the age of onset in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 40 tumor tissues of breast cancer and 6 normal breast tissues, as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification references, were randomly selected and obtained from National Tumor Bank of Iran, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran. Clinicopathological information such as stage, grade, and tumor size of each patient was also obtained from Tumor Bank for further analysis.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from breast tissue samples using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The quality and integrity of DNAs were evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The concentration of high-quality extracted DNA was standardized by using a NanoDrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)

The SALSA MLPA P078-C1 Breast Tumor probe kit (MRC, Holland) was used to determine BIRC5 gene amplification status. In each PCR reaction, three normal DNA samples and one no-template control (NTC) containing TE solution (0.1 mM EDTA+10 mM Tris-Hcl, pH 8.2) were included. All denaturation, hybridization, ligation, and PCR reactions were performed by Peqlab thermocycler (Germany). PCR products were then separated on an ABI3130 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis

Analysis of BIRC5 gene copy number was carried out using GeneMarker ver 1.6 (softgenetics, USA). As BIRC5 has more than one probe in the provided kit, the mean of all the probe peaks of this gene was calculated. If the mean value was below 0.7, the respective gene was defined as lost, while values between 0.7–1.3 and >1.3 were assigned as normal and amplified, respectively[16,17].

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were carried out by SPSS software package (PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago, USA). Significant index was checked by a factor of 95%, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

In this study, DNA copy number changes in 40 tumor tissues and 6 normal breast tissues were evaluated by using MLPA. Of the total 40 tumor samples, 17.5% (7 cases) showed BIRC5 amplification. Examples of a breast cancer patient with no genomic copy number changes and a patient with BIRC5 gene amplification are depicted in Figure 1A and 1B, respectively.
Fig. 1

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis of two samples using genemarker software. (A) A breast cancer patient with no genomic copy number changes showing a tumor sample with no changes in BIRC5 genomic copy number. As it is evident, the height of the peaks of the sample (blue) is equal to that of the standard size (orange). (B) A breast cancer patient with BIRC5 gene amplification showing a tumor sample of a breast cancer patient with BIRC5 gene amplification. BIRC5 gene probes are marked with a circle.

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis of two samples using genemarker software. (A) A breast cancer patient with no genomic copy number changes showing a tumor sample with no changes in BIRC5 genomic copy number. As it is evident, the height of the peaks of the sample (blue) is equal to that of the standard size (orange). (B) A breast cancer patient with BIRC5 gene amplification showing a tumor sample of a breast cancer patient with BIRC5 gene amplification. BIRC5 gene probes are marked with a circle. The age range of 40 samples included in this study was between 29 to 77 years, and the average was 50.27 years. Among these patients who showed the BIRC5 gene amplification, 71% (5 cases) were under 40 years. Analysis of the BIRC5 gene amplification and the comparison of changes with the age of onset of the disease showed a significant association between the breast cancer incidence in women under 40 years and an increase in BIRC5 copy number variation (P=0.04). Also, no correlation was found between the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients and BIRC5 gene amplification status (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of BIRC5 CNVs in association with clinicopathological characteristics

Clinicopathological characteristicsBIRC5 amplification (Number=7) (%)P valueNo BIRC5 amplification (Number=33) (%)P value
Stage
 I0 (0)0.62 (5)0.6
 II5 (12.5)18 (45)
 III2 (5)13 (32.5)
 IV0 (0)0 (0)
Grade
 I2 (5)0.212 (30)0.5
 II4 (10)13(32.5)
 III1 (2.5)8 (20)
Age
 ≤405 (12.5)0.046 (15)0.3
 >402 (5)27 (67)
Tumor size (cm)
 ≤20 (0)0.46 (15)0.6
 2<T≤55 (12.5)23 (57)
 >52 (5)4 (10)
Distribution of BIRC5 CNVs in association with clinicopathological characteristics

DISCUSSION

Although cancer is not prevalent in individuals under the age of 40, the incidence of the disease at a younger age may increase the risk of recurrence[18]. Breast cancer in young women is more acute with a poorer prognosis and overall survival in comparison with elder women diagnosed with the disease[11]. Hence, finding those factors that may be related to early onset of breast cancer can lead to faster diagnosis and longer period of disease free survival. BIRC5 is expressed in human embryonic tissues, while it is not detected in normal adult tissues[19]. The overexpression of this gene in tumor tissues has been already reported [20]. In the present study, the genomic copy number variation of BIRC5, which is supposed to be involved in breast cancer progression, was examined, and its association with the early-onset breast cancer was also evaluated. Also,. 17.5% of the patients showed an increase in BIRC5 gene copy number, and half of the patients under 40 years had amplified BIRC5 gene. Increase in the BIRC5 gene copy number in patients who were younger than 40 years showed a significant relationship between the two indices (P=0.04). Using MLPA technique, Kornegoor et al.[21] have studied the genomic copy number alterations for several oncogenes including BIRC5 in males with breast cancer. They found that among 110 studied samples, 40% of the patients showed an increase in the number of genomic copies of BIRC5 gene. The differences between our findings and Kornegoor et al.[21] results may be due to alterations in patients’ sex, race, and the size of sample population. Moelans et al.[22] also used MLPA technique to compare genomic BIRC5 gene copy number changes in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma, in which 20% of the patients with ductal carcinoma in situ type breast cancer and 12% of the patients with invasive ductal carcinoma type showed amplified BIRC5 gene copy number. Using reverse transcription-PCR technique, Span et al.[23] measured mRNA level of this gene in 275 breast cancer patients. They observed a significant relationship between younger patients and BIRC5 mRNA level in tumor samples. Colak et al.[11] also detected genomic changes in BIRC5 gene among patients under 45 years by studying the whole genome mRNA expression in cancer, from non-invasive breast cancer to invasive breast cancer. Sought to examine the relationship between the early onset of cancer and increase in the number of BIRC5 gene copies in tumors, Alaggio et al.[24] examined genomic copy number of the gene BIRC5 using FISH technique in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. They concluded that the number of BIRC5 gene copies in 35% of the patients in the first two decades of their life was increased. Baykara et al.[15] analyzed the copy number of 22 genes, including BIRC5, in 82 tumor tissues of lung cancer. Similar to our results they did not find any possible association with clinical parameters. By examining the number of gene copies involved in cancer development and treatment, it is possible to determine the cancer progression and the onset age with stronger prognostic. With prospective studies, larger sample sizes, and confirmation of the predictive role between BIRC5 gene amplification and the early onset of breast cancer, it is possible to use BIRC5 gene as a marker for cancer detection and the onset age prediction, as well as the likelihood of recurrence of the disease. Moreover, the results of this study indicate that increase in the expression of BIRC5 gene may not only be due to variation in transcription factors but also may occur along with the increase in the gene copy number. It is also worth mentioning that analyzing gene expression at the mRNA level by real-time PCR or at the protein level by Western blot could help to confirm these results.
  24 in total

1.  Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Ma; Ranelle Salunga; J Todd Tuggle; Justin Gaudet; Edward Enright; Philip McQuary; Terry Payette; Maria Pistone; Kimberly Stecker; Brian M Zhang; Yi-Xiong Zhou; Heike Varnholt; Barbara Smith; Michelle Gadd; Erica Chatfield; Jessica Kessler; Thomas M Baer; Mark G Erlander; Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  New applications and developments in the use of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Piotr Kozlowski; Anna J Jasinska; David J Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Molecular profiling of invasive breast cancer by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification-based copy number analysis of tumor suppressor and oncogenes.

Authors:  Cathy B Moelans; Roel A de Weger; Hanneke N Monsuur; Raymon Vijzelaar; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Do the survivin (BIRC5) splice variants modulate or add to the prognostic value of total survivin in breast cancer?

Authors:  Paul N Span; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Joop J T M Heuvel; Jacques B de Kok; John A Foekens; Fred C G J Sweep
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Breast cancer screening among females in Iran and recommendations for improved practice: a review.

Authors:  Giridhara R Babu; Goleen Samari; Sharon Phoebe Cohen; Tanmay Mahapatra; Randa May Wahbe; Sherin Mermash; Osman M Galal
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011

Review 6.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression.

Authors:  Carey K Anders; David S Hsu; Gloria Broadwater; Chaitanya R Acharya; John A Foekens; Yi Zhang; Yixin Wang; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; Phillip G Febbo; Joseph R Nevins; Anil Potti; Kimberly L Blackwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study.

Authors:  Cathy B Moelans; Roel A de Wegers; Hanneke N Monsuurs; Anoek H J Maess; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 6.730

9.  Higher incidence of premenopausal breast cancer in less developed countries; myth or truth?

Authors:  Reza Ghiasvand; Hans-Olov Adami; Iraj Harirchi; Rahim Akrami; Kazem Zendehdel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Dosage analysis of cancer predisposition genes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  D J Bunyan; D M Eccles; J Sillibourne; E Wilkins; N Simon Thomas; J Shea-Simonds; P J Duncan; C E Curtis; D O Robinson; J F Harvey; N C P Cross
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  17 in total

1.  Network analysis revealed aurora kinase dysregulation in five gynecological types of cancer.

Authors:  Shikha Suman; Ashutosh Mishra
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Integrated Genomic Characterization of the Human Immunome in Cancer.

Authors:  Yongsheng Li; Brandon Burgman; Daniel J McGrail; Ming Sun; Dan Qi; Sachet A Shukla; Erxi Wu; Anna Capasso; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Catherine J Wu; S Gail Eckhardt; Gordon B Mills; Bo Li; Nidhi Sahni; S Stephen Yi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Isolation and characterization of a new naturally immortalized human breast carcinoma cell line, KAIMRC1.

Authors:  Rizwan Ali; Nosaibah Samman; Hajar Al Zahrani; Atef Nehdi; Sabhi Rahman; Abdul Latif Khan; Mohamed Al Balwi; Lolwah Abdullah Alriyees; Manal Alzaid; Ahmed Al Askar; Mohamed Boudjelal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Hybrid Stem Cell States: Insights Into the Relationship Between Mammary Development and Breast Cancer Using Single-Cell Transcriptomics.

Authors:  Tasha Thong; Yutong Wang; Michael D Brooks; Christopher T Lee; Clayton Scott; Laura Balzano; Max S Wicha; Justin A Colacino
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-05-08

5.  Effects of gossypol on apoptosis‑related gene expression in racially distinct triple‑negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Samia S Messeha; Najla O Zarmouh; Patricia Mendonca; Hayfaa Alwagdani; Carolyn Cotton; Karam F A Soliman
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Integrated bioinformatics analysis to identify 15 hub genes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Haoxuan Jin; Xiaoyan Huang; Kang Shao; Guibo Li; Jian Wang; Huanming Yang; Yong Hou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Genetic and molecular biology of breast cancer among Iranian patients.

Authors:  Meysam Moghbeli
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Identification of novel prognosis-related genes associated with cancer using integrative network analysis.

Authors:  YongKiat Wee; Yining Liu; Jiachun Lu; Xiaoyan Li; Min Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Mitochondrial DNA copy number instability in ERBB2-amplified breast cancer tumors.

Authors:  Elmira Ebrahimi; Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Kimia Ghaffari; Reza Shirkoohi
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Integrated bioinformatics analysis reveals key candidate genes and pathways in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuzhi Wang; Yi Zhang; Qian Huang; Chengwen Li
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.