Literature DB >> 27372948

Commentary.

William P Fisher1.   

Abstract

Year:  2005        PMID： 27372948     DOI： 10.1007/s11136-005-4715-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN： 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals.

Authors:  Everett V Smith
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Objectivity in psychosocial measurement: what, why, how.

Authors:  W P Fisher
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms?

Authors:  David Andrich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: the whole may not equal the sum of the parts.

Authors:  G Stucki; L Daltroy; J N Katz; M Johannesson; M H Liang
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Comparing factor analysis and the Rasch model for ordered response categories: an investigation of the scale of gambling choices.

Authors:  Andrew Kyngdon
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2004

Review 6.  Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Herman J Adèr; Caroline B Terwee; François Pouwer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others.

Authors:  J R Platt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Should total scores from a rating scale be used directly?

Authors:  W Zhu
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  An item analysis which takes individual differences into account.

Authors:  G Rasch
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.380
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Response.

Authors:  Henrica de Vet; Herman J Adér; Caroline B Terwee; François Pouwer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.