Literature DB >> 27372537

Interobserver variance in diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee : "Wie objektiv sind arthroskopische Befunde wirklich?".

J Jerosch1,2, W H Castro1, M C Waal Malefijt3, M Busch4, A van Kampen3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We assessed the interindividual diagnostic variance of 39 experienced arthroscopists by the Kappa Cohen interobserver variation analysis using videotapes of eight different patients with different diagnoses. Arthroscopically normal findings showed a relatively acceptable interobserver correlation. Pathological changes, in contrast, often showed very little correlation, especially in the synovial membrane of the suprapatellar recess, in the cartilage of the femoropatellar groove and the posterior cruciate ligament. In patellar alignment there was also great interobserver variation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When comparing arthroscopic findings with other imaging techniques the above results should be taken into account. Furthermore, these results will affect the significance of medical expertise based only on pictures. In addition, medical cost billing, which is based on arthroscopic findings, has to take into account that a wrong diagnosis is possible and therefore charges will be wrong.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Key words Arthroscopy • Knee joint • Interobserver variance

Year:  1997        PMID: 27372537     DOI: 10.1007/s001130050193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  1 in total

1.  [Value of three-dimensional ultrasound and MRI in meniscal lesions].

Authors:  P Helwig; C Bahrs; K Weise; B Schewe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.