Literature DB >> 27372515

Factors influencing the response to high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with subacute stroke.

Won Hyuk Chang1, Kyeong Eun Uhm1, Yong-Il Shin2, Alvaro Pascual-Leone3, Yun-Hee Kim1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) aids motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. However, the response to high-frequency rTMS is highly variable between patients. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with improved motor function in response to high-frequency rTMS in subacute stroke patients with moderate to severe upper extremity motor involvement.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients with subacute stroke were enrolled. rTMS was applied over the primary motor cortex of the affected hemisphere at 10 Hz with 1,000 pulses/day for 10 days. Upper limb motor function was scored with the upper limb of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UL) score before intervention and immediately after intervention. All FMA-UL changes greater than or equal to 5 points were considered clinically significant. Potential influencing factors considered included patient characteristics, motor function, corticospinal tract (CST) integrity assessments, and genetics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the significance of each of these factors.
RESULTS: We found that the two factors with the greatest impact on the improvement in FMA-UL score were: 1) the functional integrity of the CST, and 2) the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genotype (p < 0.05). Age tended to influence clinically significant changes in the FMA-UL score, although this effect was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that high-frequency rTMS interventions aimed at improving upper extremity motor function in patients with subacute stroke with moderate to severe motor involvement should be individually tailored according to functional CST status and BDNF genotype.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BDNF; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; cortical excitability; motor recovery; rTMS; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27372515     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-150634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  9 in total

1.  Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Polymorphism Predicts Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Shreya Parchure; Denise Y Harvey; Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Laura DeLoretta; Rachel Wurzman; Daniela Sacchetti; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Falk W Lohoff; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-12

2.  Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training on the Finger Extensor Muscles for the Contralateral Corticospinal Tract in Normal Subjects: A Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang; You Sung Seo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke.

Authors:  Martina Coscia; Maximilian J Wessel; Ujwal Chaudary; José Del R Millán; Silvestro Micera; Adrian Guggisberg; Philippe Vuadens; John Donoghue; Niels Birbaumer; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Alleviates Cognitive Impairment and Modulates Hippocampal Synaptic Structural Plasticity in Aged Mice.

Authors:  Qinying Ma; Yuan Geng; Hua-Long Wang; Bing Han; Yan-Yong Wang; Xiao-Li Li; Lin Wang; Ming-Wei Wang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the ascending reticular activating system in a patient with disorder of consciousness: a case report.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang; Young Hyeon Kwon
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 6.  Microstructure and Genetic Polymorphisms: Role in Motor Rehabilitation After Subcortical Stroke.

Authors:  Jingchun Liu; Caihong Wang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 7.  Predicting Individual Treatment Response to rTMS for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Review and the CanStim Perspective.

Authors:  Franziska E Hildesheim; Alexander N Silver; Adan-Ulises Dominguez-Vargas; Justin W Andrushko; Jodi D Edwards; Numa Dancause; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-02-10

8.  Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Polymorphism Predicts Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Shreya Parchure; Denise Y Harvey; Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Laura DeLoretta; Rachel Wurzman; Daniela Sacchetti; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Falk W Lohoff; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-12

9.  Effects of 8-week sensory electrical stimulation combined with motor training on EEG-EMG coherence and motor function in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Li-Ling Hope Pan; Wen-Wen Yang; Chung-Lan Kao; Mei-Wun Tsai; Shun-Hwa Wei; Felipe Fregni; Vincent Chiun-Fan Chen; Li-Wei Chou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.