Literature DB >> 27372269

Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies.

Hector Mendez-Figueroa1, Van Thi Thanh Truong2, Claudia Pedroza2, Amir M Khan3, Suneet P Chauhan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most small (birthweight <10%) for-gestational-age cases occur at term, in uncomplicated pregnancies, and are not identified during prenatal visits as having fetal growth restriction. Hence, they do not benefit from antepartum surveillance and timed delivery. There is dismissive and disquieting opinion that small for gestational age among uncomplicated pregnancies is not associated with increased morbidities and, therefore, does not warrant improved detection. Our hypothesis was that among uncomplicated pregnancies at term, small for gestational age have significantly higher morbidity and mortality than appropriate (birthweight 10-89%) for gestational age.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare composite neonatal morbidity among uncomplicated term singleton pregnancies with small vs appropriate for gestational age. STUDY
DESIGN: We culled collected data from 9 completed Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units studies conducted from 1989 through 2004. All data were collected prospectively by trained staff. We excluded women who delivered <37 weeks and those with hypertension or diabetes, multiple gestation, known anomalies, and birthweight of ≥90% for gestational age. Using multivariable analysis, we compared composite neonatal morbidity, which included stillbirth and neonatal mortality between small and appropriate for gestational age. Random effect logistic regressions were used to account for study heterogeneity, with adjustment for potential confounders. We calculated adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Of the >91,000 women enrolled in the studies, 60% (n = 50,011) met the inclusion criteria. Among the uncomplicated pregnancies, 10.8% (n = 5416) were small for gestational age. The rate of composite neonatal morbidity of 16% in small for gestational age and 10% in appropriate for gestational age persisted (adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.71-1.78). After adjustment for confounders, the following neonatal morbidities were significantly more common among term small than appropriate for gestational age: Apgar <4 at 5 minutes, respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, necrotizing enterocolitis grade 2 or 3, and neonatal sepsis. Lastly, rate of stillbirths (3.5 vs 0.9/1000 births; adjusted odds ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.83-6.67) and neonatal mortality (1.1 vs 0.4/1000 births; adjusted odds ratio, 2.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.83-3.57) were significantly more common with small than appropriate for gestational age. In secondary analyses the composite neonatal morbidity among newborns at <5% and at 5-9% was significantly higher than appropriate for gestational age. Lastly, in subgroup analyses of women who delivered at 37.0-38.6 weeks or at ≥39.0 weeks, the increased rate of composite neonatal morbidity, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality among small for gestational age persisted.
CONCLUSION: Among uncomplicated pregnancies at term, small- compared to appropriate-for-gestational-age newborns have a significantly higher likelihood of composite neonatal morbidity, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality. A large multicenter trial is warranted to determine if improved detection of small for gestational age among uncomplicated pregnancies can mitigate morbidities and mortality, without disproportionate interventions and iatrogenic complications.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SGA; growth restriction; morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27372269     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  18 in total

Review 1.  Individualized growth assessment: conceptual framework and practical implementation for the evaluation of fetal growth and neonatal growth outcome.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Lami Yeo; Offer Erez; Uma Ramamurthy; Medha Naik; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Roberto Romero; Dereje W Gudicha; Offer Erez; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo; Gaurav Bhatti; Percy Pacora; Eli Maymon; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Neonatal Morbidity of Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates Born at Term in Uncomplicated Pregnancies.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Madeline Murguia Rice; William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.

Authors:  D Kabiri; R Romero; D W Gudicha; E Hernandez-Andrade; P Pacora; N Benshalom-Tirosh; D Tirosh; L Yeo; O Erez; S S Hassan; A L Tarca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Tracing Among Small-for-Gestational Age Compared With Appropriate-for-Gestational-Age Neonates.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Steven J Weiner; George R Saade; Michael A Belfort; Uma M Reddy; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Russell S Miller; Mara J Dinsmoor; David S McKenna; Bradley Stetzer; Dwight J Rouse; Ronald S Gibbs; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Yoram Sorokin; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Maternal and perinatal characteristics of small-for-gestational-age newborns: Ten-year experience of a single center.

Authors:  Nihal Şahin Uysal; Çağrı Gülümser; Filiz Bilgin Yanık
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2017-03-11

7.  Maternal dietary consumption of legumes, vegetables and fruit during pregnancy, does it protect against small for gestational age?

Authors:  Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano; Carmen Amezcua-Prieto; Inmaculada Salcedo-Bellido; Guadalupe González-Mata; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas; Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Metabolomics for predicting fetal growth restriction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Debora Farias Batista Leite; Aude-Claire Morillon; Elias F Melo Júnior; Renato T Souza; Ali S Khashan; Philip N Baker; Louise C Kenny; José Guilherme Cecatti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Screening for small for gestational age using third-trimester ultrasound markers: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening test accuracy.

Authors:  Cédric Gasse; Kim Paquette; Suzanne Demers; Stéphanie Roberge; Emmanuel Bujold; Amélie Boutin
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-03

10.  Reduced growth velocity across the third trimester is associated with placental insufficiency in fetuses born at a normal birthweight: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Teresa M MacDonald; Lisa Hui; Stephen Tong; Alice J Robinson; Kirsten M Dane; Anna L Middleton; Susan P Walker
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.