| Literature DB >> 27371789 |
Marina Trivisano1, Nicola Pietrafusa2, Vincenzo di Ciommo3, Simona Cappelletti4, Luca de Palma5, Alessandra Terracciano6, Enrico Bertini7, Federico Vigevano5, Nicola Specchio8.
Abstract
Aim of this study is to compare PCDH19-related epilepsy and Dravet Syndrome (DS) in order to find out differences between these two infantile epilepsies with fever sensitivity. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 patients with PCDH19-related epilepsy and 19 with DS. Comparisons were performed with Fisher's exact test or Student's t-test. Females prevailed in PCDH19-related epilepsy. Epilepsy onset was earlier in DS (5.0+2.1 vs 11.2+7.0months; p<0.05). The second seizure/cluster occurred after a longer latency in PCDH19-related epilepsy rather than in DS (10.1±13.6 vs 2.2±2.1months; p<0.05). Seizures were mainly single and prolonged seizures in DS, and brief and clustered in PCDH19-related epilepsy. Myoclonic and clonic seizures have been found only in DS. Other types of seizures were found in both epilepsies with a prevalence of GTCS and atypical absences in DS, and focal motor and hypomotor seizures in PCDH19-related epilepsy. Seizures with affective symptoms have been confirmed to be typical of PCDH19-related epilepsy. Status Epilepticus equally occurred in both groups. Photosensitivity was detected only in DS. No differences were found about the presence of intellectual disabilities and behavioral disturbances. We were able to find out some distinctive features, which could address the diagnosis towards DS or PCDH19-related epilepsy, since first manifestation. These considerations suggest to definitively considering PCDH19 gene as cause of a proper epileptic phenotype.Entities:
Keywords: Dravet Syndrome; Epilepsy classification; Genetic epilepsy; PCDH19-related epilepsy; SCN1A
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27371789 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.05.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsy Res ISSN: 0920-1211 Impact factor: 3.045