E Ben-Ami1, C M Barysauskas2, M von Mehren3, M C Heinrich4, C L Corless5, J E Butrynski1, J A Morgan1, A J Wagner1, E Choy6, J T Yap7, A D Van den Abbeele8, S M Solomon1, J A Fletcher9, G D Demetri10, S George11. 1. Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia. 4. VA Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health and Science University, Portland. 5. Oregon Health and Science University, Portland. 6. Division of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 7. Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. 8. Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Department of Radiology. 9. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston. 10. Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Department of Ludwig Center at Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. 11. Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston suzanne_george@dfci.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This investigator-initiated trial provided the justification for the phase III GRID study resulting in worldwide regulatory approval of regorafenib as a third-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We report the genotype analyses, long-term safety, and activity results from this initial trial of regorafenib in GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial was conducted between February 2010 and January 2014, among adult patients with metastatic GIST, after failure of at least imatinib and sunitinib. Patients received regorafenib orally, 160 mg once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as complete or partial response (PR), or stable disease lasting ≥16 weeks per RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), long-term safety data, and metabolic response by functional imaging were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received at least one dose of regorafenib. The median follow-up was 41 months. CBR was documented in 25 of 33 patients [76%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 58% to 89%], including six PRs. The median PFS was 13.2 months (95% CI 9.2-18.3 months) including four patients who remained progression-free at study closure, each achieving clinical benefit for more than 3 years (range 36.8-43.5 months). The median OS was 25 months (95% CI 13.2-39.1 months). Patients whose tumors harbored a KIT exon 11 mutation demonstrated the longest median PFS (13.4 months), whereas patients with KIT/PDGFRA wild-type, non-SDH-deficient tumors experienced a median 1.6 months PFS (P < 0.0001). Long-term safety profile is consistent with previous reports; hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension were the most common reasons for dose reduction. Notably, regorafenib induced objective responses and durable benefit in SDH-deficient GIST. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of patients with metastatic GIST treated with regorafenib suggests particular benefit among patients with primary KIT exon 11 mutations and those with SDH-deficient GIST. Dose modifications are frequently required to manage treatment-related toxicities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01068769.
BACKGROUND: This investigator-initiated trial provided the justification for the phase III GRID study resulting in worldwide regulatory approval of regorafenib as a third-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We report the genotype analyses, long-term safety, and activity results from this initial trial of regorafenib in GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial was conducted between February 2010 and January 2014, among adult patients with metastatic GIST, after failure of at least imatinib and sunitinib. Patients received regorafenib orally, 160 mg once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as complete or partial response (PR), or stable disease lasting ≥16 weeks per RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), long-term safety data, and metabolic response by functional imaging were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received at least one dose of regorafenib. The median follow-up was 41 months. CBR was documented in 25 of 33 patients [76%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 58% to 89%], including six PRs. The median PFS was 13.2 months (95% CI 9.2-18.3 months) including four patients who remained progression-free at study closure, each achieving clinical benefit for more than 3 years (range 36.8-43.5 months). The median OS was 25 months (95% CI 13.2-39.1 months). Patients whose tumors harbored a KIT exon 11 mutation demonstrated the longest median PFS (13.4 months), whereas patients with KIT/PDGFRA wild-type, non-SDH-deficient tumors experienced a median 1.6 months PFS (P < 0.0001). Long-term safety profile is consistent with previous reports; hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension were the most common reasons for dose reduction. Notably, regorafenib induced objective responses and durable benefit in SDH-deficient GIST. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of patients with metastatic GIST treated with regorafenib suggests particular benefit among patients with primary KIT exon 11 mutations and those with SDH-deficient GIST. Dose modifications are frequently required to manage treatment-related toxicities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01068769.
Authors: K N Ganjoo; V M Villalobos; A Kamaya; G A Fisher; J E Butrynski; J A Morgan; A J Wagner; D D'Adamo; A McMillan; G D Demetri; S George Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Suzanne George; Qian Wang; Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Meijun Zhu; James E Butrynski; Jeffrey A Morgan; Andrew J Wagner; Edwin Choy; William D Tap; Jeffrey T Yap; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Judith B Manola; Sarah M Solomon; Jonathan A Fletcher; Margaret von Mehren; George D Demetri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S Hirota; K Isozaki; Y Moriyama; K Hashimoto; T Nishida; S Ishiguro; K Kawano; M Hanada; A Kurata; M Takeda; G Muhammad Tunio; Y Matsuzawa; Y Kanakura; Y Shinomura; Y Kitamura Journal: Science Date: 1998-01-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eva Wardelmann; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Katharina Pauls; Nadja Thomas; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Thomas Heinicke; Nicola Speidel; Torsten Pietsch; Reinhard Buettner; Daniel Pink; Peter Reichardt; Peter Hohenberger Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Charles D Blanke; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Michael C Heinrich; David A Tuveson; Samuel Singer; Milos Janicek; Jonathan A Fletcher; Stuart G Silverman; Sandra L Silberman; Renaud Capdeville; Beate Kiese; Bin Peng; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Brian J Druker; Christopher Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Heikki Joensuu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: George D Demetri; Peter Reichardt; Yoon-Koo Kang; Jean-Yves Blay; Piotr Rutkowski; Hans Gelderblom; Peter Hohenberger; Michael Leahy; Margaret von Mehren; Heikki Joensuu; Giuseppe Badalamenti; Martin Blackstein; Axel Le Cesne; Patrick Schöffski; Robert G Maki; Sebastian Bauer; Binh Bui Nguyen; Jianming Xu; Toshirou Nishida; John Chung; Christian Kappeler; Iris Kuss; Dirk Laurent; Paolo G Casali Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Anette Duensing; Laura McGreevey; Chang-Jie Chen; Nora Joseph; Samuel Singer; Diana J Griffith; Andrea Haley; Ajia Town; George D Demetri; Christopher D M Fletcher; Jonathan A Fletcher Journal: Science Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: M Montemurro; H Gelderblom; U Bitz; J Schütte; J Y Blay; H Joensuu; J Trent; S Bauer; P Rutkowski; F Duffaud; D Pink Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Pushpa Neppala; Sudeep Banerjee; Paul T Fanta; Mayra Yerba; Kevin A Porras; Adam M Burgoyne; Jason K Sicklick Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Christopher B Weldon; Arin L Madenci; Sosipatros A Boikos; Katherine A Janeway; Suzanne George; Margaret von Mehren; Alberto S Pappo; Joshua D Schiffman; Jennifer Wright; Jonathan C Trent; Karel Pacak; Constantine A Stratakis; Lee J Helman; Michael P La Quaglia Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John Glod; Fernanda I Arnaldez; Lori Wiener; Melissa Spencer; J Keith Killian; Paul Meltzer; Eva Dombi; Claudia Derse-Anthony; Joanne Derdak; Ramaprasad Srinivasan; W Marston Linehan; Markku Miettinen; Seth M Steinberg; Lee Helman; Brigitte C Widemann Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 12.531