Literature DB >> 27371686

Functional assessment of the stenotic carotid artery by CFD-based pressure gradient evaluation.

Xin Liu1, Heye Zhang2, Lijie Ren3, Huahua Xiong4, Zhifan Gao2, Pengcheng Xu1, Wenhua Huang5, Wanqing Wu2.   

Abstract

The functional assessment of a hemodynamic significant stenosis base on blood pressure variation has been applied for evaluation of the myocardial ischemic event. This functional assessment shows great potential for improving the accuracy of the classification of the severity of carotid stenosis. To explore the value of grading the stenosis using a pressure gradient (PG)-we had reconstructed patient-specific carotid geometries based on MRI images-computational fluid dynamics were performed to analyze the PG in their stenotic arteries. Doppler ultrasound image data and the corresponding MRI image data of 19 patients with carotid stenosis were collected. Based on these, 31 stenotic carotid arterial geometries were reconstructed. A combinatorial boundary condition method was implemented for steady-state computer fluid dynamics simulations. Anatomic parameters, including tortuosity (T), the angle of bifurcation, and the cross-sectional area of the remaining lumen, were collected to investigate the effect on the pressure distribution. The PG is highly correlated with the severe stenosis (r = 0.902), whereas generally, the T and the angle of the bifurcation negatively correlate to the pressure drop of the internal carotid artery stenosis. The calculation required <10 min/case, which made it prepared for the fast diagnosis of the severe stenosis. According to the results, we had proposed a potential threshold value for distinguishing severe stenosis from mild-moderate stenosis (PG = 0.88). In conclusion, the PG could serve as the additional factor for improving the accuracy of grading the severity of the stenosis.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carotid artery bifurcation; computational simulation; patient-specific geometry; pressure gradient; stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27371686     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00888.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  9 in total

1.  The effect of inlet and outlet boundary conditions in image-based CFD modeling of aortic flow.

Authors:  Sudharsan Madhavan; Erica M Cherry Kemmerling
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 2.  Management of Blood Pressure After Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Zachary Bulwa; Camilo R Gomez; Sarkis Morales-Vidal; José Biller
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Correlation between Carotid Stenosis Degree and Blood Pressure Variability in Patients with Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Junli Nie; Liang Hou; Baozhen Tan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Geometric determinants of local hemodynamics in severe carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Dara Azar; William M Torres; Lindsey A Davis; Taylor Shaw; John F Eberth; Vijaya B Kolachalama; Susan M Lessner; Tarek Shazly
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Carotid DSA based CFD simulation in assessing the patient with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Dong Zhang; Pengcheng Xu; Hongyu Qiao; Xin Liu; Liangping Luo; Wenhua Huang; Heye Zhang; Changzheng Shi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Validation and Diagnostic Performance of a CFD-Based Non-invasive Method for the Diagnosis of Aortic Coarctation.

Authors:  Qiyang Lu; Weiyuan Lin; Ruichen Zhang; Rui Chen; Xiaoyu Wei; Tingyu Li; Zhicheng Du; Zhaofeng Xie; Zhuliang Yu; Xinzhou Xie; Hui Liu
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.081

7.  Optimal Design and Biomechanical Analysis of a Biomimetic Lightweight Design Plate for Distal Tibial Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Mian Wang; Yuping Deng; Pusheng Xie; Jinchuan Tan; Yang Yang; Hanbin Ouyang; Dongliang Zhao; Gang Huang; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-21

8.  A patient-specific lumped-parameter model of coronary circulation.

Authors:  Zheng Duanmu; Min Yin; Xueling Fan; Xilan Yang; Xiaoyu Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Clinical validation and assessment of aortic hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics simulations from computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Yulei Zhu; Rui Chen; Yu-Hsiang Juan; He Li; Jingjing Wang; Zhuliang Yu; Hui Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.