Literature DB >> 27371581

Effects of Specimen Collection Methodologies and Storage Conditions on the Short-Term Stability of Oral Microbiome Taxonomy.

Ting Luo1, Usha Srinivasan1, Kirtana Ramadugu1, Kerby A Shedden1, Katherine Neiswanger2, Erika Trumble1, Jiean J Li1, Daniel W McNeil3, Richard J Crout3, Robert J Weyant2, Mary L Marazita2, Betsy Foxman4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Community profiling of the oral microbiome requires the recovery of quality sequences in order to accurately describe microbial community structure and composition. Our objective was to assess the effects of specimen collection method, storage medium, and storage conditions on the relative abundance of taxa in saliva and plaque identified using 16S rRNA genes. We also assessed short-term changes in taxon composition and relative abundance and compared the salivary and dental plaque communities in children and adults. Over a 2-week period, four successive saliva and dental plaque specimens were collected from four adults with no dental decay (108 samples), and two successive specimens were collected from six children with four or more erupted teeth (48 samples). There were minimal differences in community composition at the phylum and operational taxonomic unit levels between dental plaque collection using a scaler and collection using a CytoSoft brush. Plaque samples stored in OMNIgene medium showed higher within-sample Shannon diversity, were compositionally different, and were more similar to each other than plaque stored in liquid dental transport medium. Saliva samples stored in OMNIgene recovered similar communities for at least a week following storage at room temperature. However, the microbial communities recovered from plaque and saliva stored in OMNIgene were significantly different in composition from their counterparts stored in liquid dental transport medium. Dental plaque communities collected from the same tooth type over four successive visits from the same adult did not significantly differ in structure or composition. IMPORTANCE: Large-scale epidemiologic studies require collection over time and space, often with multiple teams collecting, storing, and processing data. Therefore, it is essential to understand how sensitive study results are to modest changes in collection and storage protocols that may occur with variation in personnel, resources available at a study site, and shipping requirements. The research presented in this paper measures the effects of multiple storage parameters and collection methodologies on the measured ecology of the oral microbiome from healthy adults and children. These results will potentially enable investigators to conduct oral microbiome studies at maximal efficiency by guiding informed administrative decisions pertaining to the necessary field or clinical work.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27371581      PMCID: PMC5007772          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01132-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  Pyrosequencing analysis of the oral microflora of healthy adults.

Authors:  B J F Keijser; E Zaura; S M Huse; J M B M van der Vossen; F H J Schuren; R C Montijn; J M ten Cate; W Crielaard
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Predictive modeling of gingivitis severity and susceptibility via oral microbiota.

Authors:  Shi Huang; Rui Li; Xiaowei Zeng; Tao He; Helen Zhao; Alice Chang; Cunpei Bo; Jie Chen; Fang Yang; Rob Knight; Jiquan Liu; Catherine Davis; Jian Xu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Variations in 16S rRNA-based microbiome profiling between pyrosequencing runs and between pyrosequencing facilities.

Authors:  Minseok Kim; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.422

4.  The human oral microbiome.

Authors:  Floyd E Dewhirst; Tuste Chen; Jacques Izard; Bruce J Paster; Anne C R Tanner; Wen-Han Yu; Abirami Lakshmanan; William G Wade
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The human salivary microbiome exhibits temporal stability in bacterial diversity.

Authors:  Simon J S Cameron; Sharon A Huws; Matthew J Hegarty; Daniel P M Smith; Luis A J Mur
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.194

6.  Oral cavity contains distinct niches with dynamic microbial communities.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Jinzhi He; Jing Xue; Yan Wang; Kun Li; Keke Zhang; Qiang Guo; Xianghong Liu; Yuan Zhou; Lei Cheng; Mingyun Li; Yuqing Li; Yan Li; Wenyuan Shi; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Comparison of storage conditions for human vaginal microbiome studies.

Authors:  Guoyun Bai; Pawel Gajer; Melissa Nandy; Bing Ma; Hongqiu Yang; Joyce Sakamoto; May H Blanchard; Jacques Ravel; Rebecca M Brotman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Preliminary characterization of the oral microbiota of Chinese adults with and without gingivitis.

Authors:  Shi Huang; Fang Yang; Xiaowei Zeng; Jie Chen; Rui Li; Ting Wen; Chun Li; Wei Wei; Jiquan Liu; Lan Chen; Catherine Davis; Jian Xu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Advancing our understanding of the human microbiome using QIIME.

Authors:  José A Navas-Molina; Juan M Peralta-Sánchez; Antonio González; Paul J McMurdie; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Zhenjiang Xu; Luke K Ursell; Christian Lauber; Hongwei Zhou; Se Jin Song; James Huntley; Gail L Ackermann; Donna Berg-Lyons; Susan Holmes; J Gregory Caporaso; Rob Knight
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

10.  Storage conditions of intestinal microbiota matter in metagenomic analysis.

Authors:  Silvia Cardona; Anat Eck; Montserrat Cassellas; Milagros Gallart; Carmen Alastrue; Joel Dore; Fernando Azpiroz; Joaquim Roca; Francisco Guarner; Chaysavanh Manichanh
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Enterosalivary nitrate metabolism and the microbiome: Intersection of microbial metabolism, nitric oxide and diet in cardiac and pulmonary vascular health.

Authors:  Carl D Koch; Mark T Gladwin; Bruce A Freeman; Jon O Lundberg; Eddie Weitzberg; Alison Morris
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Increasing Reproducibility in Oral Microbiome Research.

Authors:  Divya Gopinath; Rohit Kunnath Menon
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Temporal Variability of Oral Microbiota over 10 Months and the Implications for Future Epidemiologic Studies.

Authors:  Emily Vogtmann; Xing Hua; Liang Zhou; Yunhu Wan; Shalabh Suman; Bin Zhu; Casey L Dagnall; Amy Hutchinson; Kristine Jones; Belynda D Hicks; Rashmi Sinha; Jianxin Shi; Christian C Abnet
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Long-Term Use of Oral Hygiene Products Containing Stannous and Fluoride Ions: Effect on Viable Salivary Bacteria.

Authors:  Anne Brigitte Kruse; Nadine Schlueter; Viktoria Konstanze Kortmann; Cornelia Frese; Annette Anderson; Annette Wittmer; Elmar Hellwig; Kirstin Vach; Ali Al-Ahmad
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 5.  Overview of the Microbiome Among Nurses study (Micro-N) as an example of prospective characterization of the microbiome within cohort studies.

Authors:  Christine Everett; Chengchen Li; Jeremy E Wilkinson; Andrew T Chan; Wendy S Garrett; Curtis Huttenhower; Eric B Rimm; Mingyang Song; Long H Nguyen; Lauren J McIver; Kerry Ivey; Jacques Izard; Natalia Palacios; A Heather Eliassen; Walter C Willett; Alberto Ascherio; Qi Sun; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 17.021

6.  Comparison of Oral Collection Methods for Studies of Microbiota.

Authors:  Emily Vogtmann; Jun Chen; Muhammad G Kibriya; Amnon Amir; Jianxin Shi; Yu Chen; Tariqul Islam; Mahbubul Eunes; Alauddin Ahmed; Jabun Naher; Anisur Rahman; Bhaswati Barmon; Rob Knight; Nicholas Chia; Habibul Ahsan; Christian C Abnet; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.090

Review 7.  Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research.

Authors:  Dorothy Kim; Casey E Hofstaedter; Chunyu Zhao; Lisa Mattei; Ceylan Tanes; Erik Clarke; Abigail Lauder; Scott Sherrill-Mix; Christel Chehoud; Judith Kelsen; Máire Conrad; Ronald G Collman; Robert Baldassano; Frederic D Bushman; Kyle Bittinger
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 14.650

8.  The Impact of DNA Polymerase and Number of Rounds of Amplification in PCR on 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Data.

Authors:  Marc A Sze; Patrick D Schloss
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.389

9.  The salivary microbiome is consistent between subjects and resistant to impacts of short-term hospitalization.

Authors:  Damien J Cabral; Jenna I Wurster; Myrto E Flokas; Michail Alevizakos; Michelle Zabat; Benjamin J Korry; Aislinn D Rowan; William H Sano; Nikolaos Andreatos; R Bobby Ducharme; Philip A Chan; Eleftherios Mylonakis; Beth Burgwyn Fuchs; Peter Belenky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Storage media and not extraction method has the biggest impact on recovery of bacteria from the oral microbiome.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhou; Shanika Nanayakkara; Jin-Long Gao; Ky-Anh Nguyen; Christina J Adler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.