| Literature DB >> 27371556 |
Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel1, María Del Carmen Terrones-Saldívar2, Jesús Hernández-Tinoco3, María Daniela Enriqueta Muñoz-Terrones2, Roberto Oswaldo Gallegos-González2, Luis Francisco Sánchez-Anguiano3, Martha Elena Reyes-Robles2, Fernando Jaramillo-Juárez2, Oliver Liesenfeld4, Sergio Estrada-Martínez3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We determined the seroprevalence and correlates of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women in Aguascalientes City, Mexico.Entities:
Keywords: Toxoplasma; behavioral characteristics; pregnant women; risk factors; seroprevalence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27371556 PMCID: PMC4947781 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Geographical location of Aguascalientes State, Mexico. It is located in central Mexico, and the geographical coordinates of its capital (Aguascalientes City) are 21°53′N, 102°18′W. This city has a temperate semiarid climate, a mean annual rainfall of 500 mm, an altitude of 1700 m above sea level and a mean annual temperature of 18.5°C.
Sociodemographic characteristics of pregnant women and prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection
| Prevalence of | p Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | N | N | Per cent | |
| Age groups (years) | ||||
| 20 or less | 141 | 10 | 7.1 | 0.54 |
| 21–30 | 151 | 10 | 6.6 | |
| 31 or more | 41 | 1 | 2.4 | |
| Ethnic group | ||||
| Mestizo | 312 | 17 | 5.4 | 0.001 |
| White | 4 | 3 | 75.0 | |
| Birth place | ||||
| Aguascalientes State | 284 | 18 | 6.3 | 0.96 |
| Other Mexican State | 51 | 3 | 5.9 | |
| Abroad | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Residence place | ||||
| Aguascalientes State | 332 | 20 | 6.0 | 1.00 |
| Other Mexican State | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Residence area | ||||
| Urban | 237 | 16 | 6.8 | 0.88 |
| Suburban | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Rural | 91 | 5 | 5.5 | |
| Educational level (years) | ||||
| 0–6 | 42 | 6 | 14.3 | 0.03 |
| 7–12 | 263 | 15 | 5.7 | |
| >12 | 33 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Occupation | ||||
| Agriculture | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.89 |
| Housewife | 273 | 19 | 7.0 | |
| Business | 11 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Employee | 11 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Student | 26 | 2 | 7.7 | |
| Professional | 9 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| None | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Other | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Socioeconomic level | ||||
| Low | 76 | 7 | 9.2 | 0.28 |
| Medium | 258 | 14 | 5.4 | |
Bivariate analysis of clinical data and infection with Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women
| Characteristic | Women tested | Prevalence of | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | N | Per cent | ||
| Clinical status | ||||
| Healthy | 315 | 21 | 6.7 | 1.00 |
| Ill | 13 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Lymphadenopathy ever | ||||
| Yes | 34 | 2 | 5.9 | 1.00 |
| No | 291 | 19 | 6.5 | |
| Abdominal pain | ||||
| Yes | 61 | 8 | 13.1 | 0.03 |
| No | 271 | 13 | 4.8 | |
| Headache frequently | ||||
| Yes | 97 | 8 | 8.2 | 0.34 |
| No | 237 | 13 | 5.5 | |
| Memory impairment | ||||
| Yes | 19 | 4 | 21.1 | 0.02 |
| No | 315 | 17 | 5.4 | |
| Reflexes impairment | ||||
| Yes | 9 | 1 | 11.1 | 0.45 |
| No | 319 | 20 | 6.3 | |
| Hearing impairment | ||||
| Yes | 27 | 1 | 3.7 | 1.00 |
| No | 307 | 20 | 6.5 | |
| Visual impairment | ||||
| Yes | 50 | 1 | 2.0 | 0.33 |
| No | 283 | 20 | 7.1 | |
| Surgery ever | ||||
| Yes | 92 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.01 |
| No | 240 | 20 | 8.3 | |
| Blood transfusion | ||||
| Yes | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| No | 322 | 21 | 6.5 | |
| Hepatitis | ||||
| Yes | 14 | 3 | 21.4 | 0.04 |
| No | 315 | 17 | 5.4 | |
| Number of pregnancies | ||||
| One | 159 | 12 | 75 | 0.35 |
| Two to nine | 176 | 9 | 5.1 | |
| Deliveries | ||||
| Yes | 119 | 5 | 4.2 | 0.30 |
| No | 215 | 15 | 7.0 | |
| Caesarean sections | ||||
| Yes | 70 | 2 | 2.9 | 0.26 |
| No | 265 | 19 | 7.2 | |
| Abortions | ||||
| Yes | 44 | 4 | 9.1 | 0.49 |
| No | 291 | 17 | 5.8 | |
| Stillbirths | ||||
| Yes | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 1.00 |
| No | 329 | 21 | 6.4 | |
Bivariate analysis of a selection of putative risk factors for infection with Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women
| Women tested | Prevalence of | p Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | N | N | Per cent | |
| Cats in the neighbourhood | ||||
| Yes | 185 | 14 | 7.6 | 0.28 |
| No | 149 | 7 | 4.7 | |
| Beef consumption | ||||
| Yes | 314 | 18 | 5.7 | 0.13 |
| No | 21 | 3 | 14.3 | |
| Sheep meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 167 | 7 | 4.2 | 0.35 |
| No | 137 | 9 | 6.6 | |
| Chicken meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 323 | 20 | 6.2 | 0.41 |
| No | 8 | 1 | 12.5 | |
| Turkey meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 59 | 2 | 3.4 | 0.54 |
| No | 270 | 18 | 6.7 | |
| Rabbit meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 34 | 3 | 8.8 | 0.46 |
| No | 297 | 18 | 6.1 | |
| Horse meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 17 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.61 |
| No | 313 | 21 | 6.7 | |
| Sausages or ham consumption | ||||
| Yes | 318 | 20 | 6.3 | 0.48 |
| No | 10 | 1 | 10.0 | |
| Chorizo consumption | ||||
| Yes | 298 | 16 | 5.4 | 0.23 |
| No | 29 | 3 | 10.3 | |
| Unwashed raw fruits | ||||
| Yes | 49 | 5 | 10.2 | 0.20 |
| No | 287 | 16 | 5.6 | |
| Untreated water | ||||
| Yes | 69 | 5 | 7.2 | 0.58 |
| No | 262 | 15 | 5.7 | |
| Frequency of eating out of home | ||||
| Never | 38 | 5 | 13.2 | 0.10 |
| 1–10 times a year | 177 | 9 | 5.1 | |
| >10 times a year | 116 | 5 | 4.3 | |
| Alcohol consumption | ||||
| Yes | 23 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.38 |
| No | 311 | 21 | 6.8 | |
| Washing hands before eating | ||||
| Yes | 309 | 17 | 5.5 | 0.05 |
| No | 24 | 4 | 16.7 | |
| Toilet facilities | ||||
| Sewage pipes | 313 | 18 | 5.8 | 0.01 |
| Latrine or another | 8 | 3 | 37.5 | |
Multivariate analysis of selected characteristics of pregnant women and their association with Toxoplasma gondii infection
| Characteristic | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| White ethnicity | 149.4 | 10.8 to 2054.1 | 0.00 |
| Poor education (0–6 years) | 2.91 | 0.73 to 11.55 | 0.12 |
| Never eating out of home | 0.54 | 0.07 to 3.73 | 0.53 |
| No washing hands before eating | 6.41 | 1.73 to 23.6 | 0.005 |
| Use of latrine | 37.6 | 4.63 to 306.31 | 0.001 |