Li-Hong Wan1, Xiao-Pei Zhang2, Miao-Miao Mo2, Xiao-Ni Xiong3, Cui-Ling Ou3, Li-Ming You1, Shao-Xian Chen4, Min Zhang5. 1. School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Neurology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. 3. Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 4. School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: chenshaoxian5@163.com. 5. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adopting healthy behaviors is critical for secondary stroke prevention, but many patients fail to follow national guidelines regarding diet, exercise, and abstinence from risk factors. Compliance often decreases with time after hospital discharge, yet few studies have examined programs promoting long-term adherence to health behaviors. Goal setting and telephone follow-up have been proven to be effective in other areas of medicine, so this study evaluated the effectiveness of a guideline-based, goal-setting telephone follow-up program for patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: This was a multicenter, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Ninety-one stroke patients were randomized to either a control group or an intervention group. Intervention consisted of predischarge education and 3 goal-setting follow-up sessions conducted by phone. Data were collected at baseline and during the third and sixth months after hospital discharge. RESULTS: Six months after discharge, patients in the intervention group exhibited significantly higher medication adherence than patients in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in physical activity, nutrition, low-salt diet adherence, blood pressure monitoring, smoking abstinence, unhealthy use of alcohol, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS:Goal-setting telephone follow-up intervention for ischemic stroke patients is feasible and leads to improved medication adherence. However, the lack of group differences in other health behavior subcategories and in themRS score indicates a need for more effective intervention strategies to help patients reach guideline-recommended targets.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Adopting healthy behaviors is critical for secondary stroke prevention, but many patients fail to follow national guidelines regarding diet, exercise, and abstinence from risk factors. Compliance often decreases with time after hospital discharge, yet few studies have examined programs promoting long-term adherence to health behaviors. Goal setting and telephone follow-up have been proven to be effective in other areas of medicine, so this study evaluated the effectiveness of a guideline-based, goal-setting telephone follow-up program for patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS: This was a multicenter, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Ninety-one strokepatients were randomized to either a control group or an intervention group. Intervention consisted of predischarge education and 3 goal-setting follow-up sessions conducted by phone. Data were collected at baseline and during the third and sixth months after hospital discharge. RESULTS: Six months after discharge, patients in the intervention group exhibited significantly higher medication adherence than patients in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in physical activity, nutrition, low-salt diet adherence, blood pressure monitoring, smoking abstinence, unhealthy use of alcohol, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Goal-setting telephone follow-up intervention for ischemic strokepatients is feasible and leads to improved medication adherence. However, the lack of group differences in other health behavior subcategories and in themRS score indicates a need for more effective intervention strategies to help patients reach guideline-recommended targets.
Authors: Aoife Stephenson; Sarah Howes; Paul J Murphy; Judith E Deutsch; Maria Stokes; Katy Pedlow; Suzanne M McDonough Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Bernadeta Bridgwood; Kate E Lager; Amit K Mistri; Kamlesh Khunti; Andrew D Wilson; Priya Modi Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-05-07
Authors: Adewale Samuel Akinosun; Rob Polson; Yohanca Diaz-Skeete; Johannes Hendrikus De Kock; Lucia Carragher; Stephen Leslie; Mark Grindle; Trish Gorely Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Nadia Minian; Tricia Corrin; Mathangee Lingam; Wayne K deRuiter; Terri Rodak; Valerie H Taylor; Heather Manson; Rosa Dragonetti; Laurie Zawertailo; Osnat C Melamed; Margaret Hahn; Peter Selby Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.295