Literature DB >> 27370895

Microsatellite instability is associated with reduced disease specific survival in stage III colon cancer.

H M Mohan1, E Ryan1, I Balasubramanian2, R Kennelly2, R Geraghty2, F Sclafani2, D Fennelly2, R McDermott2, E J Ryan1, D O'Donoghue2, J M P Hyland2, S T Martin2, P R O'Connell1, D Gibbons2, Des Winter1, K Sheahan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to 15% of colorectal cancers exhibit microsatellite instability (MSI), where errors in replication go unchecked due to defects in the mismatch repair system. This study aimed to determine survival in a large single-centre series of 1250 consecutive colorectal cancers subjected to universal MSI testing.
METHODS: Clinical and pathological features of patients with colorectal cancer identified on prospectively maintained colorectal and pathology databases at St. Vincent's University Hospital from 2004 to May 2012 were examined. Mismatch repair (MMR) status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier curves, the log-rank test and Cox regression were used to associate survival with clinical and pathological characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the 1250 colorectal cancers in the study period, 11% exhibited MSI (n = 138). Patients with MSI tumours had significantly lower rates of lymph node and distant metastases (MSI N+ rate: 24.8% compared with MSS N+ rate: 46.2%, p < 0.001). For Stage I and II disease MSI was associated with improved disease free survival (DSS) compared with MSS colon cancer. However, patients with Stage III MSI colon cancers had a worse DSS than those with MSS tumours. Stage III MSI tumours exhibited higher rates of lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion than Stage I/II MSI tumours.
CONCLUSION: MSI is associated with a reduced risk of nodal and distant metastases, with an improved DSS in Stage I/II colon cancer. However, when MSI tumours progress to Stage III these patients had worse outcomes and pathological features. New strategies for this cohort of patients may be required to improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Colorectal cancer; Microsatellite instability; Mismatch repair proteins

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27370895     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Evolving Role of Consensus Molecular Subtypes: a Step Beyond Inpatient Selection for Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Javier Ros; Iosune Baraibar; Giulia Martini; Francesc Salvà; Nadia Saoudi; José Luis Cuadra-Urteaga; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Josep Tabernero; Elena Élez
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-11-06

Review 2.  Clinical Significance and Prognostic Relevance of Microsatellite Instability in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Angelika Copija; Dariusz Waniczek; Andrzej Witkoś; Katarzyna Walkiewicz; Ewa Nowakowska-Zajdel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Screening for mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer: data from three academic medical centers.

Authors:  Grainne M O'Kane; Éanna Ryan; Terri P McVeigh; Ben Creavin; John Mp Hyland; Diarmuid P O'Donoghue; Denise Keegan; Robert Geraghty; Delia Flannery; Carmel Nolan; Emily Donovan; Brian J Mehigan; Paul McCormick; Cian Muldoon; Michael Farrell; Conor Shields; Niall Mulligan; Michael John Kennedy; Andrew J Green; Desmond C Winter; Padraic MacMathuna; Kieran Sheahan; David J Gallagher
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Expending Role of Microsatellite Instability in Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Liisa Chang; Minna Chang; Hanna M Chang; Fuju Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-12

5.  Effects of CDX2 on prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

Authors:  É J Ryan; B Creavin; Y L Khaw; M E Kelly; H M Mohan; R Geraghty; E J Ryan; R Kennelly; A Hanly; S T Martin; D Fennelly; R McDermott; D Gibbons; P R O'Connell; K Sheahan; D C Winter
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-07-24

6.  E3 ubiquitin ligase Smurf2: a prognostic factor in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fee Klupp; Christina Giese; Niels Halama; Clemens Franz; Felix Lasitschka; Arne Warth; Thomas Schmidt; Matthias Kloor; Alexis Ulrich; Martin Schneider
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 7.  Correlations between microsatellite instability and the biological behaviour of tumours.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Ru-Yi Zheng; Zai-Shun Jin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Is microsatellite instability-high really a favorable prognostic factor for advanced colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bingyan Wang; Fei Li; Xin Zhou; Yanpeng Ma; Wei Fu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Assessment of the Circulating Tumor Cells and Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Prognostic and Diagnostic Value.

Authors:  Aya Alsayed; Salem E Salem; Mostafa M El Serafi; Mona S Abdellateif; Abdel-Rahman N Zekri; Marwa Mohanad; Abeer A Bahnassy
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Automated Quantitation of CD8-positive T Cells Predicts Prognosis in Colonic Adenocarcinoma With Mucinous, Signet Ring Cell, or Medullary Differentiation Independent of Mismatch Repair Protein Status.

Authors:  Douglas J Hartman; Madison Frank; Lindsey Seigh; Haroon Choudry; James Pingpank; Matthew Holtzman; David Bartlett; Nathan Bahary; Liron Pantanowitz; Reetesh K Pai
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.