Literature DB >> 27370697

Comparison of plasma and tissue samples in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation by ARMS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

MeiLi Ma1, ChunLei Shi1, JiaLin Qian1, JiaJun Teng1, Hua Zhong1, BaoHui Han2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and accuracy of blood-based circulating-free tumor DNA on testing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations.
METHODS: In total, 219 non-small cell lung cancer patients in stages III-IV were enrolled into this study. All patients had tissue samples and matched plasma DNA samples. EGFR gene mutations were detected by the Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS). We compared the mutations in tumor tissue samples with matched plasma samples and determined the correlation between EGFR mutation status and clinical pathologic characteristics. RESULT: The overall concordance rate of EGFR mutation status between the 219 matched plasma and tissue samples was 82% (179/219). The sensitivity and specificity for the ARMS EGFR mutation test in the plasma compared with tumor tissue were 60% (54/90) and 97% (125/129), respectively. The positive predictive value was 93% (54/58) and the negative predictive value was 78% (125/161). The median overall survival was longer for those with EGFR mutations than for those without EGFR mutations both in tissue samples (23.98 vs. 12.16months; P<0.001) and in plasma (19.96 vs. 13.63months; P=0.009). For the 68 patients treated with EGFR- tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in the EGFR mutant group compared to the non-mutation group in tumor tissue samples (12.26months vs. 2.40months, P<0.001). In plasma samples, the PFS of the mutant group was longer than that of the non-mutant group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (10.88months vs. 9.89months, P=0.411).
CONCLUSIONS: The detection of EGFR mutations in plasma using ARMS is relatively sensitive and highly specific. However, EGFR mutation status tested by ARMS in plasma cannot replace a tumor tissue biopsy. Positive EGFR mutation results detected in plasma are fairly reliable, but negative results are hampered by a high rate of false negatives.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARMs; EGFR mutation; Non-small cell lung cancer; Plasma DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27370697     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.06.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of EGFR mutations detected by LNA-ARMS PCR in plasma ctDNA samples and matched tissue sample in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Jiahui Jin; Jingjing He; Xinyu Yan; Yaru Zhao; Haojie Zhang; Kai Zhuang; Yating Wen; Junzhen Gao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Comparison of the Amplification Refractory Mutation System, Super Amplification Refractory Mutation System, and Droplet Digital PCR for T790 M Mutation Detection in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Failure of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment.

Authors:  Lucheng Zhu; Shirong Zhang; Yanping Xun; Yanping Jiang; Bing Xia; Xueqin Chen; Limin Wang; Hong Jiang; Shenglin Ma
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  A comparison of EGFR mutation status in tissue and plasma cell-free DNA detected by ADx-ARMS in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Hanyan Xu; Adam Abdul Hakeem Baidoo; Shanshan Su; Junru Ye; Chengshui Chen; Yupeng Xie; Luca Bertolaccini; Mahmoud Ismail; Biagio Ricciuti; Calvin Sze Hang Ng; Raja M Flores; Yuping Li
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04

Review 4.  Mechanisms of resistance to third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Shuhang Wang; Yongping Song; Feifei Yan; Delong Liu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  A Comparison of ddPCR and ARMS for detecting EGFR T790M status in ctDNA from advanced NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance.

Authors:  Wenxian Wang; Zhengbo Song; Yiping Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Clinical validation of a highly sensitive assay to detect EGFR mutations in plasma cell-free DNA from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yuping Li; Hanyan Xu; Shanshan Su; Junru Ye; Junjie Chen; Xuru Jin; Quan Lin; Dongqing Zhang; Caier Ye; Chengshui Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  EGFR C797S mutation mediates resistance to third-generation inhibitors in T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shuhang Wang; Stella T Tsui; Christina Liu; Yongping Song; Delong Liu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 8.  Clinical efficacy and safety of afatinib in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Lei-Yun Wang; Jia-Jia Cui; Ao-Xiang Guo; Ji-Ye Yin
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Smoking habit and chemo-radiotherapy and/or surgery affect the sensitivity of EGFR plasma test in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Vinh Thanh Tran; Thang Thanh Phan; Son Truong Nguyen; Bich-Thu Tran; Toan Trong Ho; Suong Phuoc Pho; Tran Bao Nguyen; Tuyen Thi Bich Pham; Anh Tuan Le; Vu Thuong Le; Hang Thuy Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-08-03

10.  Can peripheral blood be used as surrogate in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaowei Mao; Yujun Zhang; Fangfang Xie; Xiaoxuan Zheng; Jiayuan Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.