| Literature DB >> 27370685 |
Giada Amodio1, Valentina Canti2, Luana Maggio3, Susanna Rosa3, Maria Teresa Castiglioni3, Patrizia Rovere-Querini4, Silvia Gregori5.
Abstract
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-G is involved in reprogramming immune responses at fetal-maternal interface during pregnancy. We evaluated the genetic diversity of the 3' Un-Translated Region (UTR) of HLA-G, previously associated with HLA-G mRNA post-transcriptional regulation, in women with unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL), with 2 pregnancy losses (RPL-2, n=28), or 3 or more pregnancy losses (RPL-3, n=24), and in 30 women with a history of successful pregnancy. Results showed in RPL-2, but not in RPL-3, women compared to controls: i) higher frequency of the 14bp Ins allele, in single and in double copy; ii) significantly lower frequency of DelG/X genotype, iii) reduced frequency of the UTR-2, and UTR-3 haplotypes; iv) higher frequencies of the UTR-5, UTR-7, and UTR-8 haplotypes. This pilot study supports the relevance of performing 3'UTR HLA-G genetic screening, not limited to a specific polymorphism, but considering the extended haplotypes, as a possible predictor of pregnancy outcome.Entities:
Keywords: 3′UTR polymorphisms of HLA-G; HLA-G; Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27370685 PMCID: PMC5021086 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.06.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Immunol ISSN: 0198-8859 Impact factor: 2.850
Patients characteristics and pregnancy history.
| RPL-2 women | RPL-3 women | HP women | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (N) | 28/52 | 24/52 | 30 |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 36.3 ± 4.3 | 36.5 ± 4.3 | 36.1 ± 4.0 |
| Caucasian (N, %) | 26/28 (92.8) | 22/24 (91.7) | 27 (90) |
| Miscarriages (N, %) | 57/69 (82.6) | 92/112 (82.1) | 0 |
| Intrauterine fetal death (N, %) | 1/69 (1.4) | 1/112 (0.9) | 0 |
| Live birth (N, %) | 11/69 (16) | 19/112 (17) | 38 (100) |
Estimated allele and genotype frequencies observed at HLA-G 3′UTR polymorphic sites in RPL and HP women.
| Polymorphisms | RPL-2 (N = 28) | Freq (%) | RPL-3 (N = 24) | Freq (%) | HP (N = 30) | Freq (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ins | 28 | 50 | 20 | 44 | 21 | 35 | 0.1327 | 0.5511 |
| Del | 28 | 50 | 28 | 56 | 39 | 65 | ||
| Ins/Ins | 7 | 25 | 4 | 17 | 3 | 10 | 0.1729 | 0.6868 |
| Del/Del | 7 | 25 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 37 | 0.4022 | 0.7720 |
| Ins/Del | 14 | 50 | 13 | 54 | 16 | 53 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| C | 10 | 18 | 6 | 12.5 | 6 | 10 | 0.2843 | 0.7629 |
| T | 46 | 82 | 42 | 87.5 | 54 | 90 | ||
| C/C | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| T/T | 18 | 64 | 19 | 79 | 25 | 84 | 0.1362 | 0.7363 |
| C/T | 10 | 36 | 4 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 0.0667 | 1.0000 |
| C | 26 | 46.5 | 22 | 46 | 32 | 53 | 0.5774 | 0.5615 |
| G | 30 | 53.5 | 26 | 54 | 28 | 47 | ||
| C/C | 8 | 28 | 7 | 29 | 8 | 27 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| G/G | 10 | 36 | 9 | 37.5 | 7 | 23 | 0.3902 | 0.3695 |
| C/G | 10 | 36 | 8 | 33.5 | 15 | 50 | 0.3012 | 0.2738 |
| A | 4 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0.1953 | 0.5838 |
| C | 52 | 93 | 46 | 96 | 59 | 98 | ||
| A/A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – |
| C/C | 24 | 86 | 22 | 92 | 29 | 97 | 0.1866 | 0.5791 |
| A/C | 4 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0.1866 | 0.5791 |
| C | 47 | 84 | 44 | 92 | 58 | 97 | 0.4032 | |
| T | 9 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 3 | ||
| C/C | 19 | 68 | 20 | 83 | 28 | 93 | 0.3890 | |
| T/T | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | ||
| C/T | 9 | 32 | 4 | 17 | 2 | 7 | 0.3890 | |
| C | 25 | 45 | 20 | 42 | 25 | 42 | 0.8515 | 1.0000 |
| G | 31 | 55 | 28 | 58 | 35 | 58 | ||
| C/C | 5 | 19 | 4 | 17 | 3 | 10 | 0.4637 | 0.6868 |
| G/G | 8 | 28 | 8 | 33 | 8 | 27 | 1.0000 | 0.7653 |
| C/G | 15 | 53 | 12 | 50 | 19 | 63 | 0.5945 | 0.4098 |
| A | 42 | 75 | 35 | 73 | 42 | 70 | 0.6781 | 0.8317 |
| G | 14 | 25 | 13 | 27 | 18 | 30 | ||
| A/A | 14 | 50 | 11 | 46 | 14 | 46.5 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| G/G | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0.4918 | 0.4969 |
| A/G | 14 | 50 | 13 | 54 | 14 | 46.5 | 1.0000 | 0.7846 |
| C | 38 | 68 | 34 | 71 | 43 | 72 | 0.6896 | 1.0000 |
| G | 18 | 32 | 14 | 29 | 17 | 28 | ||
| C/C | 12 | 43 | 11 | 46 | 14 | 46.5 | 0.7976 | 1.0000 |
| G/G | 2 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| C/G | 14 | 50 | 12 | 50 | 14 | 46.5 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
P = Comparison between RPL with 2 pregnancy losses (RPL-2) and HP using Fisher’s test.
P = Comparison between RPL with 3 or more pregnancy losses (RPL-3) and HP using Fisher’s test.
∗ = Statistical significance was lost after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Bold values are significant values obtained comparing RPL-2 versus HP women.
Estimated genotype frequencies observed at HLA-G 3′UTR polymorphic sites in RPL and HP women.
| Polymorphisms | RPL-2 (N = 28) | Freq (%) | RPL-3 (N = 24) | Freq (%) | HP (N = 30) | Freq (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InsG/InsG | 7 | 25 | 4 | 17 | 3 | 10 | 0.1729 | 0.6868 |
| DelC/DelC | 5 | 18 | 5 | 21 | 4 | 13 | 0.7260 | 0.4542 |
| InsG/DelC | 13 | 46 | 8 | 33 | 10 | 33.5 | 0.4214 | 0.7654 |
| DelG/X | 3 | 11 | 7 | 29 | 13 | 43.5 | 0.7688 | |
P = Comparison between RPL with 2 pregnancy losses (RPL-2) and HP using Fisher’s test.
P = Comparison between RPL with 3 or more pregnancy losses (RPL-2) and HP using Fisher’s test.
∗ = Statistical significance calculated with/without Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Bold values are significant values obtained comparing RPL-2 versus HP women.
Estimated haplotype frequencies observed at HLA-G 3′UTR polymorphic sites in RPL and HP women.
| Haplotypes | RPL-2 (N = 28) | Freq (%) | RPL-3 (N = 24) | Freq (%) | HP (N = 30) | Freq (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTR-1 | 14 | 25 | 13 | 27 | 18 | 30 | 0.6781 | 0.8317 |
| UTR-2 | 13 | 23 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 27.5 | 0.8304 | 0.3671 |
| UTR-3 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 | 14 | 23 | 0.3300 | |
| UTR-4 | 9 | 16 | 5 | 10.5 | 6 | 10 | 0.4108 | 1.0000 |
| UTR-5 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.1051 | 0.3209 |
| UTR-6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.6089 | 0.3209 |
| UTR-7 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.1953 | 0.3209 |
| UTR-8 | 6 | 11 | 5 | 10.5 | 3 | 5 | 0.3105 | 0.4621 |
P = Comparison between RPL with 2 pregnancy losses (RPL-2) and HP using Fisher’s test.
P = Comparison between RPL with 3 or more pregnancy losses (RPL-3) and HP using Fisher’s test.
∗ = Statistical significance was lost after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Bold values are significant values obtained comparing RPL-2 versus HP women.
Estimated allelic frequencies of 3′UTR haplotypes of HLA-G in RPL and HP women.
| Haplotypes | RPL-2 (N = 28) | Freq (%) | RPL-3 (N = 24) | Freq (%) | HP (N = 30) | Freq (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 bp Del | UTR-1 | 14 | 50 | 13 | 46 | 18 | 46 | 0.8076 | 1.0000 |
| UTR-4-6 | 11 | 39 | 8 | 29 | 7 | 18 | 0.0920 | 0.3777 | |
| UTR-3 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 25 | 14 | 36 | 0.4276 | ||
| 14 bp Ins | UTR-2 | 13 | 46 | 9 | 45 | 16 | 76 | 0.0578 | |
| UTR-5-7-8 | 15 | 54 | 11 | 55 | 5 | 24 | 0.0578 | ||
P = Comparison between RPL with 2 pregnancy losses (RPL-2) and HP using Fisher’s test.
P = Comparison between RPL with 3 or more pregnancy losses (RPL-3) and HP using Fisher’s test.
∗ = Statistical significance was lost after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
Bold values are significant values obtained comparing RPL-2 versus HP women.