Literature DB >> 27370211

Faecal haemoglobin concentration is related to detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the next screening round.

Jayne Digby1,2, Callum G Fraser1,2, Francis A Carey3, Robert H Diament4, Margaret Balsitis5, Robert Jc Steele1,2,6.   

Abstract

Objective To examine associations between faecal haemoglobin concentrations below the cut-off used in colorectal cancer screening and outcomes in the next screening round. Methods In the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme, faecal haemoglobin concentrations and diagnostic outcomes were investigated for participants with a negative result (faecal haemoglobin concentrations < 80.0 µg Hb/g faeces), followed by a positive result within two years. Results Of 37,780 participants with negative results, at the next screening round, 556 (1.5%) screened positive and 30,293 (80.2%) negative. Initial median faecal haemoglobin concentrations (2.1 µg Hb/g faeces, IQR: 0.0-13.2) were higher in those with subsequent positive results than those with subsequent negative results (0.0 µg Hb/g faeces, IQR: 0.0-1.4; p < 0.0001). Using faecal haemoglobin concentrations 0.0-19.9 µg Hb/g faeces as reference, logistic regression analysis showed high adjusted odds ratios for advanced neoplasia (advanced neoplasia: colorectal cancer or higher risk adenoma) detection at the next round of 14.3 (95% CI: 8.9-23.1) in those with initial faecal haemoglobin concentrations 20.0-39.9 µg Hb/g faeces, and 38.0 (95% CI: 20.2-71.2) with 60.0-79.9 µg Hb/g faeces. Conclusions A higher proportion of participants with faecal haemoglobin concentrations of ≥ 20 µg Hb/g faeces had advanced neoplasia detected at the next round than participants with lower faecal haemoglobin concentrations. Although most relevant when using high faecal haemoglobin concentrations cut-offs, studies of faecal haemoglobin concentrations and outcomes over screening rounds may provide strategies to direct available colonoscopy towards those at highest risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced neoplasia; colorectal cancer; faecal haemoglobin; faecal immunochemical test; faecal occult blood test; risk; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27370211     DOI: 10.1177/0969141316653983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  7 in total

1.  The First Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer in the North of Iran.

Authors:  Hossein-Ali Nikbakht; Javad Shokri-Shirvani; Hassan Ashrafian-Amiri; Haleh Ghaem; Ali Jafarnia; Sedigheh Alijanpour; Seyed-Mostaffa Mirzad; Soheil Hassanipour
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

Review 2.  Risk-stratified strategies in population screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Reinier Meester; Lucie de Jonge; Andrea Buron; Ulrike Haug; Carlo Senore
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 7.316

3.  Evaluation of a fecal immunochemistry test prior to colonoscopy for outpatients with various indications.

Authors:  Andrew Szilagyi; Xiaoqing Xue
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-10

4.  Risk-adjusted colorectal cancer screening using the FIT and routine screening data: development of a risk prediction model.

Authors:  Jennifer Anne Cooper; Nick Parsons; Chris Stinton; Christopher Mathews; Steve Smith; Stephen P Halloran; Sue Moss; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Using fecal immunochemical test values below conventional cut-off to individualize colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Eva Plantener; Ulrik Deding; Jeppe Buur Madsen; Rasmus Kroijer; Jonna Skov Madsen; Gunnar Baatrup
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-04-14

6.  Comparison with first round findings of faecal haemoglobin concentrations and clinical outcomes in the second round of a biennial faecal immunochemical test based colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Gavin Rc Clark; Callum G Fraser; Judith A Strachan; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 1.687

7.  The use of electronic healthcare records for colorectal cancer screening referral decisions and risk prediction model development.

Authors:  Jennifer Anne Cooper; Ronan Ryan; Nick Parsons; Chris Stinton; Tom Marshall; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.067

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.