Literature DB >> 27369576

Explaining variability in first grazing season heifer growth combining individually measured parasitological and clinical indicators with exposure to gastrointestinal nematode infection based on grazing management practice.

Aurélie Merlin1, Alain Chauvin2, Aurélien Madouasse2, Sébastien Froger2, Nathalie Bareille2, Christophe Chartier2.   

Abstract

The objective of our study was to explain the variability of average daily weight gain (ADWG) due to gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infection for 291 non treated first grazing season (FGS) heifers, from 12 independent groups in the western part of France, by combining parasitological and clinical indicators at individual level and grazing management indicators at group level. Parasitological indicators were faecal egg count (FEC), anti Ostertagia ostertagi antibody level (Ostertagia ODR), and pepsinogen level. Clinical indicators were diarrhea score (DISCO) and breech soiling score (BSS). At group level, grazing management practice (GMP), based on three variables (supplementation, month of turnout, grazing season duration), was clustered into three categories reflecting low, medium or high exposure (EXP) to GIN. Depending on the groups, turnout was from mid-March to early July and housing was from mid-October to late November, with a FGS duration ranging from 4 to 8.4 months. At turnout, the mean age of heifers was 8 months (range: 6-16 months) and they weighed between 175 and 268kg. In each GMP category, FEC significantly decreased between the mid-season and the housing, while Ostertagia ODR and pepsinogen level increased gradually throughout the grazing season. In contrast, clinical indicators did not show any seasonal variation. In a multivariate linear model, 22% of the ADWG variability was significantly explained by two individual indicators (Ostertagia ODR: 12.6%, DISCO: 4.8%) and by the group indicator (GMP category: 4.8%). ADWG losses due to GIN exposure (Ostertagia ODR) were estimated up to 39kg per heifer for the overall grazing season. For groups within the low EXP category the difference between animals with low (<697g/day) or high (>697g/day) ADWG was explained by the clinical indicator DISCO. In contrast, for groups within the medium and high EXP categories this difference was explained by a parasitological indicator (Ostertagia ODR). This study highlighted the value of combining both grazing management (group level) and parasitological (individual level) indicators to assess the impact of GIN on ADWG of FGS heifers. As a result, this combination might allow a better discrimination of animals or groups that may be in need of treatment in a targeting selective treatment approach.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Average daily weight gain; Breech soiling score; Diarrhea score; ELISA Ostertagia ODR; Faecal egg count; Heifer-nematoda; Pepsinogen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27369576     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  3 in total

Review 1.  Decision making on helminths in cattle: diagnostics, economics and human behaviour.

Authors:  Johannes Charlier; Valérie De Waele; Els Ducheyne; Mariska van der Voort; Fiona Vande Velde; Edwin Claerebout
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.146

2.  Gastrointestinal nematodes and Fasciola hepatica in Norwegian cattle herds: a questionnaire to investigate farmers' perceptions and control strategies.

Authors:  Tonje Opsal; Ingrid Toftaker; Ane Nødtvedt; Lucy Jane Robertson; Kristoffer Relling Tysnes; Ian Woolsey; Lisbeth Hektoen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  A comparison of two different anthelmintic treatment regimens against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections on two Lithuanian sheep farms.

Authors:  Tomas Kupcinskas; Inga Stadaliene; Algimantas Paulauskas; Pavelas Trusevicius; Saulius Petkevicius; Johan Höglund; Mindaugas Sarkunas
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 1.695

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.