Literature DB >> 27368150

Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in local anesthesia of the nasopharynx: A meta-analysis.

Xiaoyun Yu1, Jiyun Wang, Lizhen Huang, Xiao Yu, Zheyun He.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of bupivacaine compared with lidocaine in local anesthesia of nasopharynx through meta-analysis.
METHODS: A number of medical literature data bases were searched electronically. Relevant journals and references of included studies were manually searched. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment.
RESULTS: Four studies were included. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, acceptable discomfort, and bleeding scores were analyzed for bupivacaine versus lidocaine. When considering the VAS scores, bupivacaine as a local anesthetic agent was better than lidocaine in controlling the pain of postoperative patients (p < 0.00001). From VAS scores of patients for transnasal fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopic examination that was performed to evaluate upper airway structures, lidocaine was found to be better at pain management in patients who underwent transnasal endoscopic examination (p < 0.00001). However, when analyzing the acceptable discomfort of patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, which serves as a valuable tool to evaluate upper gastrointestinal structures, the patients in the bupivacaine group demonstrated a higher acceptable discomfort than the patients in the lidocaine group (p = 0.008). With regard to the bleeding scores of the patients with nasal surgery, lidocaine was better at bleeding in postoperative patients compared with bupivacaine (p = 0.0007). These results indicated that bupivacaine showed better pain control of postoperative patients and acceptable discomfort in patients with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Lidocaine had a significantly increased ability the pain of patients with transnasal fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopic examination and bleeding in postoperative patients. No systemic adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION: Bupivacaine was found to have better promotion to pain control than did lidocaine for the patients after nasal surgery. Lidocaine had a significantly increased inhibition of bleeding in these postoperative patients; however, the efficacy between bupivacaine and lidocaine was unclear for the patients who had transnasal endoscopic examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27368150     DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  4 in total

1.  Reality bites: The establishment of accountable care organizations in otolaryngology.

Authors:  Troy D Woodard
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.467

2.  Local Hematoma Block as Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Eric Astacio; Gabriel Echegaray; Lenny Rivera; Jorge M Otero-Delgado; Gerardo Olivella; Norman Ramírez; Nestor Ramos-Alconini; Christian Foy
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2020-03-21

3.  Graphene Oxide-Reinforced Alginate Hydrogel for Controlled Release of Local Anesthetics: Synthesis, Characterization, and Release Studies.

Authors:  Cuong Hung Luu; Giang Nguyen; Thanh-Tuyen Le; Thanh-Mai Ngoc Nguyen; V H Giang Phan; Mohanapriya Murugesan; Ramya Mathiyalagan; Lu Jing; Gopinathan Janarthanan; Deok Chun Yang; Yi Li; Thavasyappan Thambi
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-04-16

4.  Effect of bupivacaine versus lidocaine local anesthesia on postoperative pain reduction in single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Sang Hyun Cho; Kyung Jin Eoh; Jung-Yun Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-03-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.