Literature DB >> 27367786

Semiquantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for accurate classification of complex adnexal masses.

Anahita Fathi Kazerooni1,2, Mahrooz Malek3,4, Hamidreza Haghighatkhah5, Sara Parviz3, Mahnaz Nabil6, Leila Torbati3, Sanam Assili1, Hamidreza Saligheh Rad1,2, Masoumeh Gity3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the best dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) descriptive parameters in predicting malignancy of complex ovarian masses, and develop an optimal decision tree for accurate classification of benign and malignant complex ovarian masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative DCE-MR images of 55 sonographically indeterminate ovarian masses (27 benign and 28 malignant) were analyzed prospectively. Four descriptive parameters of the dynamic curve, namely, time-to-peak (TTP), wash-in-rate (WIR), relative signal intensity (SIrel ), and the initial area under the curve (IAUC60 ) were calculated on the normalized curves of specified regions-of-interest (ROIs). A two-tailed Student's t-test and two automated classifiers, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machines (SVMs), were used to compare the performance of the mentioned parameters individually and in combination with each other.
RESULTS: TTP (P = 6.15E-8) and WIR (P = 5.65E-5) parameters induced the highest sensitivity (89% for LDA, and 97% for SVM) and specificity (93% for LDA, and 100% for SVM), respectively. Regarding the high sensitivity of TTP and high specificity of WIR and through their combination, an accurate and simple decision-tree classifier was designed using the line equation obtained by LDA classification model. The proposed classifier achieved an accuracy of 89% and area under the ROC curve of 93%.
CONCLUSION: In this study an accurate decision-tree classifier based on a combination of TTP and WIR parameters was proposed, which provides a clinically flexible framework to aid radiologists/clinicians to reach a conclusive preoperative diagnosis and patient-specific therapy plan for distinguishing malignant from benign complex ovarian masses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:418-427.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; complex ovarian masses; decision tree; dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27367786     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in categorizing ovarian masses and predicting clinical outcome: a preliminary study.

Authors:  He Zhang; Yunfei Mao; Xiaojun Chen; Guoqing Wu; Xuefen Liu; Peng Zhang; Yu Bai; Pengcong Lu; Weigen Yao; Yuanyuan Wang; Jinhua Yu; Guofu Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the characterisation of small, non-palpable solid testicular tumours.

Authors:  Lucia Manganaro; Matteo Saldari; Carlotta Pozza; Valeria Vinci; Daniele Gianfrilli; Ermanno Greco; Giorgio Franco; Maria Eleonora Sergi; Michele Scialpi; Carlo Catalano; Andrea M Isidori
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Characterization of active and infiltrative tumorous subregions from normal tissue in brain gliomas using multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Mahnaz Nabil; Mehdi Zeinali Zadeh; Kavous Firouznia; Farid Azmoudeh-Ardalan; Alejandro F Frangi; Christos Davatzikos; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  He-Li Xu; Ting-Ting Gong; Fang-Hua Liu; Hong-Yu Chen; Qian Xiao; Yang Hou; Ying Huang; Hong-Zan Sun; Yu Shi; Song Gao; Yan Lou; Qing Chang; Yu-Hong Zhao; Qing-Lei Gao; Qi-Jun Wu
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-09-17

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence in tumor subregion analysis based on medical imaging: A review.

Authors:  Mingquan Lin; Jacob F Wynne; Boran Zhou; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Prediction of low-risk breast cancer using quantitative DCE-MRI and its pathological basis.

Authors:  Tingting Xu; Lin Zhang; Hong Xu; Sifeng Kang; Yali Xu; Xiaoyu Luo; Ting Hua; Guangyu Tang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-01

7.  Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer using DCE-MRI habitat descriptors.

Authors:  N Andres Parra; Hong Lu; Qian Li; Radka Stoyanova; Alan Pollack; Sanoj Punnen; Jung Choi; Mahmoud Abdalah; Christopher Lopez; Kenneth Gage; Jong Y Park; Yamoah Kosj; Julio M Pow-Sang; Robert J Gillies; Yoganand Balagurunathan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-12-14

8.  MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lotte W E van Nimwegen; Annelies M C Mavinkurve-Groothuis; Ronald R de Krijger; Caroline C C Hulsker; Angelique J Goverde; József Zsiros; Annemieke S Littooij
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Quantitative analysis of the MRI features in the differentiation of benign, borderline, and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Fuxia Xiao; Lin Zhang; Sihua Yang; Kun Peng; Ting Hua; Guangyu Tang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  Two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2 weighted imaging-based radiomic signatures for the preoperative discrimination of ovarian borderline tumors and malignant tumors.

Authors:  Xuefen Liu; Tianping Wang; Guofu Zhang; Keqin Hua; Hua Jiang; Shaofeng Duan; Jun Jin; He Zhang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.234

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.